Re: And this related to Radio HOW??
This is relative to the radio business, because it shows the growing leniency for the FCC to continue to loosen it's grip on media conglomerates and thus retrict freedom of speech. It is important for the radio business to stay up to date on any recent decisions the FCC is making that affect media conglomerates. This is because the FCC has Not "ruined the Radio Business," in fact it would be more effective to think that the FCC has "crippled" the radio business. Hear me when I say, the FCC could very much potentially loosen the reins even more so on media conglomerates and do far more than cripple radio. The FCC may just kill local radio altogether. In short, It is naive to think in terms of "ruined" and "not ruined," when refering to the FCC's impact on radio.
In addition, this decision will also have a direct impact on radio, because a major source for content for many talk radio personalities, and even some music jocks is none other than the local newspaper. Talk persoanlities are responsible for addressing the current "buzz" of society. The buzz is often largely discerned by newspapers, as a result, it gives personalties less "local buzz" to work with.
I appreciate the post. Any FCC decisions regarding media conglomerates is very relative to the radio business.
> Just gotta wonder - what does this have to do with RAY DEE
> O?
>
> We all know how the media conglomerates have ruined the
> Radio Bidness.
> Just gotta wonder - what does this have to do with RAY DEE
> O?
>
> We all know how the media conglomerates have ruined the
> Radio Bidness.
>
