> > If I were Jim Waters over at CHUM Ltd., I'd be looking
> into
> > hiring Andy and as many of the others as I could get
> (along
> > with some new and intelligent voices), saying farewell to
> > the oldies, and making 1050/CHUM a "smart talk" station
> > pitched directly at the upscale and younger talk audience
> > CBC has been getting.
> >
> > This is something they should be considering for any
> > underperforming AM they have in any of their big markets.
> >
>
> Andy Barrie was already employed in the 90's with CFRB 1010.
>
> With highest respect to your opinion, Wouldn't Standard
> radio already have thought of this idea when Wally Crouter
> was retiring?...instead of hiring Ted Woolshin?
If they'd done so, they would have retained more of their audience if the BBMs are any guide. CFRB made a lot of mistakes in the 1990s and that was just one of them. There's no reason why they should have lost the morning talk lead to CBC Radio One if they'd programmed it right, but they did.
>
> OR in the case of 640 Toronto (which hapens to be in worse
> shape by the way)
> Why not have 640 Toronto snatch Andy Barrie up if the idea
> is great?
Again---has 640 made ANY really good decisions on programming lately? The 1.5 shares speak for themselves.
> The other problem is that CHUM tried talk, and it
> failed..both in their sports format(Team 1050) and in their
> short lived Dr.Laura/oldies days.
Not a valid comparison since you're alluding to specialty talk in one instance and an aborted fraction of a talk format in the other. The sports format was an attempt to crowd into a narrow niche that already ws filled by an existing station.
And the Dr.Laura experiment a decade ago was an aborted segment of what was originally SUPPOSED to be a full service talk format, which was never even close to fully implemented. (The rest of the plan, for local morning, afternoon drive and early evening talk shows at all the CHUM Ltd. AM stations including CHUM-AM in Toronto and a midday nationally-syndicated but Toronto-produced block, never came to fruition.)
> Besides, oldies is alot cheaper to run.
> One live morning show, and that's it.
> The vt's in the pc look after the rest of the program...even
> the afternoon drive is vt'd...been that way since mid 1996.
> (minus the team days...and for the technical folk, minus the
> Pelmorex/Media net days...but the studio was still empty!)
Cheaply run programming isn't always the bargain it seems, especially if you can't get out of the 1s in BBM share with it (and therefore can't generate the revenue a more successful station would attract).