• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

More bandwidth from WCS Wireless

This is from Reuters:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1040_22-5788221.html
XM Satellite Radio has agreed to buy privately held WCS Wireless in a stock deal worth $198 million, giving it additional frequency to broaden its offerings into such areas as video.

Under the terms of the deal announced Wednesday, the nation's No. 1 satellite radio provider offered 5.5 million XM shares for the assets of WCS Wireless.

WCS Wireless's primary assets are its wireless spectrum licenses that on average include 10 megahertz in the frequency bands adjacent to XM's satellite radio service and are in areas covering 163 million people throughout the United States.

XM, which has 4.4 million subscribers, said the deal will enable it to expand into multimedia subscription services, like video and data offerings, through new frequencies and products, as well as integrating them with XM's current satellite radio offerings.

"They now have a bigger pipe to play with," said Roger Entner, analyst with Ovum technology research firm.

In an interview, XM Chairman Gary Parsons said the acquisition should help his company more readily find a compelling business model to deliver video to its customers.

"This essentially doubles the amount of capacity we've had available and while we've demonstrated video, we had not seen a compelling business model for this going forward. This could mean we have a compelling business case," Parsons said.

He said that in order to launch an attractive video model previously, XM would have had to hurt its existing audio service because video required so much frequency.

"Right now, as far as a product building strategy goes, there clearly could be a standalone video product over either frequency," he said.

XM said it plans to announce more details on the use of the additional spectrum in the future. XM has 12.5 megahertz of frequency under its satellite radio license. The deal should close before year's end, subject to regulatory approval.

"I've always said satellite radio will be more than just radio. This deal allows XM a tremendous amount of freedom without jeopardizing the core music offering," said April Horace, analyst with Hoefer and Arnett.

The WCS frequencies are wireless communications frequencies that are currently not being utilized for any consumer service and were acquired by WCS on a market-by-market basis, XM said.

XM competes with Sirius Satellite Radio in the emerging pay-radio market. Sirius also recently announced an expansion into video.
 
> additional frequency to broaden its offerings into such
> areas as video.

What _THE HELL_ is wrong with XM?

Here's a freaking novel idea....let's make the CURRENT stations sound quality not suck. Then worry about other crap. XM, didn't you learn the first time? You added a billion channels and ran out of bandwidth so you made the current ones sound like crap. Why do I see this happening AGAIN when you add video?

You're a RADIO COMPANY. Use this extra bandwidth to fix what you have.

[/rant]<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
 
> > additional frequency to broaden its offerings into such
> > areas as video.
>
> What _THE HELL_ is wrong with XM?
>
> Here's a freaking novel idea....let's make the CURRENT
> stations sound quality not suck. Then worry about other
> crap. XM, didn't you learn the first time? You added a
> billion channels and ran out of bandwidth so you made the
> current ones sound like crap. Why do I see this happening
> AGAIN when you add video?
>
> You're a RADIO COMPANY. Use this extra bandwidth to fix
> what you have.
>
> [/rant]
>


Hey, you gotta keep up with the Joneses. Sirius is doing this, so XM has too as well. No different than anything else in business. I love XM, but buiness wise they are probably going down. Sirius is no different. This industry is in trouble financially.
 
> > additional frequency to broaden its offerings into such
> > areas as video.
>
> What _THE HELL_ is wrong with XM?
>
> Here's a freaking novel idea....let's make the CURRENT
> stations sound quality not suck. Then worry about other
> crap. XM, didn't you learn the first time? You added a
> billion channels and ran out of bandwidth so you made the
> current ones sound like crap. Why do I see this happening
> AGAIN when you add video?
>
> You're a RADIO COMPANY. Use this extra bandwidth to fix
> what you have.
>
> [/rant]
>
I agree! XM programming is awsome, but the quality just ruins it.
 
> > > additional frequency to broaden its offerings into such
> > > areas as video.
> >
> > What _THE HELL_ is wrong with XM?
> >
> > Here's a freaking novel idea....let's make the CURRENT
> > stations sound quality not suck. Then worry about other
> > crap. XM, didn't you learn the first time? You added a
> > billion channels and ran out of bandwidth so you made the
> > current ones sound like crap. Why do I see this happening
>
> > AGAIN when you add video?
> >
> > You're a RADIO COMPANY. Use this extra bandwidth to fix
> > what you have.
> >
> > [/rant]
> >
>
>
> Hey, you gotta keep up with the Joneses. Sirius is doing
> this, so XM has too as well. No different than anything else
> in business. I love XM, but buiness wise they are probably
> going down. Sirius is no different. This industry is in
> trouble financially.

This seems like a great idea, actually. Both sat providers really want to get into video into moving vehicles, their automobile partners really want it. XM's audio quality can only improve if these extra services are moved off satellite. I hope Sirius is equally as clever.
 
> Hey, you gotta keep up with the Joneses. Sirius is doing
> this, so XM has too as well. No different than anything else
> in business. I love XM, but buiness wise they are probably
> going down. Sirius is no different. This industry is in
> trouble financially.
>

Just because the other company is doing it doesn't mean it'll attract more subs though. Same with the women's channel. How many women have sat radio?
 
> > Hey, you gotta keep up with the Joneses. Sirius is doing
> > this, so XM has too as well. No different than anything
> else
> > in business. I love XM, but buiness wise they are probably
>
> > going down. Sirius is no different. This industry is in
> > trouble financially.
> >
>
> Just because the other company is doing it doesn't mean
> it'll attract more subs though. Same with the women's
> channel. How many women have sat radio?
>

They're trying to reach a marketshare that isn't being served by satellite radio -- women.
 
> They're trying to reach a marketshare that isn't being
> served by satellite radio -- women.
>

If only they put as much effort into keeping their existing customer base from not switching services. Do as many women really listen to radio as men?
 
> This seems like a great idea, actually. Both sat providers
> really want to get into video into moving vehicles, their
> automobile partners really want it. XM's audio quality can
> only improve if these extra services are moved off
> satellite. I hope Sirius is equally as clever.

Another thing to ponder:

These frequencies are intended for local broadcast of satradio style services.

So, there's nothing stopping them for moving a traffic service off the bird to the local transmitter... and there's nothing stopping them from adding a Korean channel for LA only or other localized feeds.

They can do a lot of things with these licences, and as usual, they're not going to say jack publicly.

Meanwhile, you have to laugh at the NAB's latest rantings about this. How exactly is it wrong for Metro to FTP a traffic report to Sirius or XM to read a Traffic Pulse report in DC about a different city but it's perfectly ok for Clear Channel to FTP the traffic for Birmingham, AL from studios in Atlanta or to FTP Las Vegas/Tucson/Yuma traffic reports from Phoenix?
<P ID="signature">______________
...co-moderator of the Satellite Radio, Phoenix, and San Diego boards...</P>
 
> > additional frequency to broaden its offerings into such
> > areas as video.
>
> What _THE HELL_ is wrong with XM?

Applause... thank you. I thought I would be the only one -crazy- enough to think XM getting into video was incredibly stupid. If they want to run DirecTV (or worse, cruddy music videos), let them invest in those entities. It's called XM RADIO for a reason.

XM thinks the audio quality is more than fine on their music channels since most people listen in their cars, which is hardly a hi-fi environment. But when you listen to some of their compressed audio channels, especially those under-water sounding traffic channels, you have to wonder what they are smoking. Can anyone actually understand those things?

The added bandwidth should be used to add radio channels, not video. Low bandwidth data such as traffic and weather would not be a problem to me. Sirius is definitely getting more innovative than XM (although they still lack the diversity in the music channels that XM has ((no new age or easy listening channel just to think of two))). Why can't XM offer things like the BBC or other international radio services? Why is it compelling to give us an audio feed of E!?

I actually suspect XM will use part of this bandwidth to develop more regional/localized channels, which will provoke the NAB just as much as if they start piping video, but I can't imaging what they think they can do with what little extra bandwidth they are getting.
 
The NAB got both SDARs to agree to "no local content over terrestrial repeaters" when the got their licenses.
BTW...<a target="_blank" href=http://www.mobaho.com/english/support/mobaho.html>MobaHO!</a> has streamed video from the getgo, but the Japanese government gave them as much bandwidth as Sirius and XM combined.<P ID="signature">______________
_____________________________________________
Proud 2 B a pioneering satellite radio subs¢riber
Ai4i is always on the trailing edge of technology</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom