• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

More TV newscasts for Houston - 39 and 26

I guess 39 will keep the news going......a morning show in 2009? Good for channel 39.


Fox doing a 5:00 hour long newscast is a idea that I thought would happen sooner or later. My problem with that is that I can't get my Simpsons fix, I bet The Simpsons does better there than the news.....
 
It's funny, besides a quick meeting with afternoon staffers. No mention of this has been made inside the building at KRIV. According to sources, there are no press releases, not even any copy of this article or anything in the I-News computers there. It's nice of them to let their staff know that they are expanding. I find this increasingly interesting with the recent layoffs of four full-time staffers. Not to mention, countless other positions that have been eliminated due to budget cuts.

At first, KRIV will struggle with the afternoon news against the other three, but their ratings against the other three in the morning, are just as good or better in some time periods. I don't get the appeal, but it does well. So yes, at first the ratings will be better with Simpsons/Malcolm. However, in the long run, the news will be more competitive and it will make a lot more money. Local news is an easier sale (and a bigger profit margin) than syndicated sitcoms. However, it is a costly operation, too.

As for KHCW, I always have said they will not be able to compete with KRIV, unless they expand the 9pm to an hour. Now, I think they will do a lot better. To me, Sherry Williams and Alan Hemberger are better anchors than Mike Barajas & Melissa Wilson. And, while I like Dr. Jim & Mark Berman better for weather and sports, I think Keith Monahan and Jorge Vargas have cemented themselves as credible sources. So, I think there could be a legitimate battle there. The only advantage for KRIV, is their lead-ins tend to be better. The CW programming is mostly geared at teens and young adults. Not necessarily the demo that stays tuned for the news. I am not sure about expanding to do a morning newscast. I would spend extra time developing your hour long show and see how that goes first. Adding that would be very costly. However, I guess Tribune's new owners mean business and aren't necessarily as cheap as the last bunch.
 
snoman said:
It's funny, besides a quick meeting with afternoon staffers. No mention of this has been made inside the building at KRIV. According to sources, there are no press releases, not even any copy of this article or anything in the I-News computers there. It's nice of them to let their staff know that they are expanding. I find this increasingly interesting with the recent layoffs of four full-time staffers. Not to mention, countless other positions that have been eliminated due to budget cuts.

At first, KRIV will struggle with the afternoon news against the other three, but their ratings against the other three in the morning, are just as good or better in some time periods. I don't get the appeal, but it does well. So yes, at first the ratings will be better with Simpsons/Malcolm. However, in the long run, the news will be more competitive and it will make a lot more money. Local news is an easier sale (and a bigger profit margin) than syndicated sitcoms. However, it is a costly operation, too.

As for KHCW, I always have said they will not be able to compete with KRIV, unless they expand the 9pm to an hour. Now, I think they will do a lot better. To me, Sherry Williams and Alan Hemberger are better anchors than Mike Barajas & Melissa Wilson. And, while I like Dr. Jim & Mark Berman better for weather and sports, I think Keith Monahan and Jorge Vargas have cemented themselves as credible sources. So, I think there could be a legitimate battle there. The only advantage for KRIV, is their lead-ins tend to be better. The CW programming is mostly geared at teens and young adults. Not necessarily the demo that stays tuned for the news. I am not sure about expanding to do a morning newscast. I would spend extra time developing your hour long show and see how that goes first. Adding that would be very costly. However, I guess Tribune's new owners mean business and aren't necessarily as cheap as the last bunch.
The Channel 39 move is very welcome and, as you say, very necessary for them to be taken seriously as a news source. The moves at 26 are a surprise; interesting what you say about the internal workings - reminds me of a certain radio station I worked for where the first place you found out about station promotions, including remotes you were assigned to, was when the promo came up on your shift.
 
Expect Fox 26 to add a 10pm newscast in the next year or so as well. Most of the Fox owned stations that didn't have a 10pm (or 11 on the east coast) newscast are starting to add them. The addition of a 5 or 6pm newscast has also been a priority for the Fox station group.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom