It just dawned on me that Mike Stern got fired from the PD chair of their (long defunct) sister station in Denver sometime around 2000 or 2001.
If he couldn't handle a much smaller market such as Denver, why on earth did they ever hire him for Q101?!!! :
They keep making one bad programming move right after another. Tisa LaSorte? WHAT A JOKE! Nothing like hiring the ex-PD of two stations embraced by geriatrics (Chicago's WGN and Phoenix's KTAR) to guide a station that (now) targets Men 18 - 34 (previously Persons 18 -34).
I'm suuuuuure she's in touch with what Q101's demo wants to hear on the air and see online.
I do like the fact that Q101 has tightened up and toughened up its playlist; taking on an Active Rock-friendly approach makes the most sense. With that said, the station has done so much collateral damage to itself over the past several years that it's anyone's guess as to whether or not the male audience they've alienated will come back in the numbers the station enjoyed 5, 6, or 7 years ago.
Let's look at what surrounds the station's music right now:
--A couple leftovers from their previous failed morning show. I have a feeling Q101 isn't even going to "try" in mornings for a while. Why? Emmis overall is hurting in a financial sense, and I bet Q101's margins SUCKED through 9/30/07. They had a morning show staffed with a half dozen people that earned ZERO ratings. They dumped a morning show (Mancow) that probably still billed pretty well and was coming off a #1 book in Men 25-54 in spring 2006.
I wouldn't like for any substantial programming changes in mornings until Spring 2008 at the earliest.
--Somewhat plain imaging. The station's imaging needs more bells & whistles. It does little to grab the listener's attention.
--A positioning statement that doesn't say anything. "Chicago's Alternative" really does not connote the musical changes the station has made recently. A return to "Chicago's New Rock" or a change to "Chicago's Rock Alternative" would be
much more effective. The station also needs to do a better job of highlighting its musical changes.
--A night show that is completely out of place. The Manno brothers seem like very nice guys, but they do NOT fit a "rock" image. They might be better off at some sort of talk station somewhere.
--For a company that sure likes to hype the integration of the radio station with its web site, I find it rather interesting that Emmis/Chicago can't even find enough cash to offer live streaming 24/7.
In a nutshell, all of the aforementioned issues are symptoms of a single, overreaching problem -- POOR BRANDING!