Maybe it'll grow on me .... but I liked the hour of stunting better than I liked the first hour of format. Maybe it's an acquired taste. First time(s) I heard Jack (Canada version), it took a couple hours but I liked it quite a bit after that "this is different". From the pre-launch descriptions, I was hoping it would be closer to the Beat -- but certainly understand I'm probably too old for anyone's target so can appreciate WHY they went younger.I do, however, find it a bit strange they are using Charity James for both 92.5 and WARM imaging. Normally I don't get that wrapped up in image voices; but hers' is distinct enough that I would use it in only one place and keep it associated with ONE station. Along the imaging lines, I'm not a fan of the "we make you feel good" positioning -- and that always got under my skin when oldies stations were in bed with that positioner. But it goes to that "don't make promises you can't keep" pet peeve.I also wonder about the ongoing strategy of launching jockless. Used to make sense ... but these days when you're competing with anything that can deliver a music library (DMX, Satellite, MP3's, streams), seems like making a first impression with ALL components in place might be more strategic. Otherwise you run that risk of "they didn't get it right, I'll just go mix it myself" reaction that matched my first impression. I still don't agree with the image-only packaging the US stations have done with Jack -- figure if they had some foreground elements in there it would sustain a lot longer than people's life expectancy for that format.But on the positive side, I would have written the obituary right away had they launched rock. Of ALL demographics, that audience is MOST likely to abandon radio for other medium choices -- so kudos for dodging that bullet. Also, this is better complement to their cluster than rock would have been for combo selling. But then again...I was also excited to have another major country station (Wolf) launch, and haven't listened since their first week.