"THIS JUST IN: many more stations voicetrack than you might believe. Entertainment is entertainment- I've heard personaities I know for sure are voicetracked blow guys live in the studio out of the water. It's the talent that makes the difference, not whether they're live or memorex."
I agree about voicetracking, as a technology. As I've said a number of times, I think it's odd when people here criticize terrestrial radio for voice-tracking, then talk about how great some old Top 40 jock's XM or Sirius satellite show is by comparison (Bobby Ocean, or whoever). We all know Bobby doesn't fly to XM headquarters in New York to do his XM show live - he voice tracks it from his home studio in Marvelous Marin.
What people are objecting to is CONTENT, or lack of content. Bobby's XM show is more than just a juke box, it has content that he provides. But many local commercial FMs in the Bay Area have voice-tracked shows with almost NO DJ content. Have you heard Darren McPeake's "show" on Star 101.3? Just awful - he provides probably 2 minutes of content an hour, at irregular intervals. If research is showing that the jock's talking causes tune-out, these stations should stop pretending, and just go jock-less like Jack or Max-FM.
The difference between KFRC and sister station K-Earth 101 in LA is striking. The KRTH jocks are obviously on a strict clock, and obviously read a lot of liners, but they also get to break in more often, they talk about 10 to 15 seconds into the stop set, and get to reveal some personality. There are a lot of stations that still allow jocks some time to be themselves - KFOG, The Bone, Alice, and Wild 94.9 are four of them, and I think they sound better than their competitors, and probably create some loyalty from listeners. Why would anybody be a passionate fan of a station like Star? It's just an i-pod with commercials most of the day.