• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Music Adjustment and Decades

I was listening to WDOK earlier, and hearing their mix got me thinking. What would happen in a few years when AC and Classic Hits stations have to change their playlist and older tunes to keep their formats frest and attract younger listeners?

My guess is WMJI will go 70's and 80's (probably little to no 60's), WDOK drops the 70's and cuts back big on 80's (they might be heading in that direction anyway) with more focus on 90's, 2000's and today, and WHLK could probably focus on 90's and add more 2000's. Don't know about WNCX.

What are your thoughts on this?
 
CleveFan said:
I was listening to WDOK earlier, and hearing their mix got me thinking. What would happen in a few years when AC and Classic Hits stations have to change their playlist and older tunes to keep their formats frest and attract younger listeners?

My guess is WMJI will go 70's and 80's (probably little to no 60's), WDOK drops the 70's and cuts back big on 80's (they might be heading in that direction anyway) with more focus on 90's, 2000's and today, and WHLK could probably focus on 90's and add more 2000's. Don't know about WNCX.

What are your thoughts on this?

NCX hasn't changed in 25 years (give or take a post Howard Stern morning show), no reason to think they will anytime soon

MJI probably won't change too much. If it ain't broke...

DOK will probably always have a little 70s and 80s in their mix...just enough to give it a different flavor than Q 104.

106.5 is a wild card. They could just kinda morph into more of a rock station to serve as a flanker to WMMS as they go more into mancave territory, and focus less on music.
 
I think the 80s will always have a following, much moreso in fact than the 90s. Late 90s music is still very strong on AC and Hot AC, and most early 90s has no more appeal.

The 80s will always be the basis of a format like The Lake (and the old Mix 106.5) and while they may gain some more airplay on Majic down the line, the 80s will never go away on the Variety Hits format
 
Cleveland (and Akron) is an older market demographically. CLE one of the oldest Midwest markets in the Top 30. Because of this WMJI skews older than most CC classic hits stations and is successful. And, there's Lanigan (for now).

WMJI has a great music mix, for the most part. I don't agree with the 80s titles (and with PPM they can see, daily, how those titles fare).

I hear WMJI skew as old as '59 with The Contours "Do You Love Me". So they're not on an "80s revolution" per se'. In fact, Keith Abrams is very selective. Imaging is well done, tempo of the station is excellent. Action does a great job.

WMJI has tried to shave off pre-65 and add more 80s and when it does so it suffers. I've been hearing some 60s titles not heard in quite some time. Refreshing. I'd like to hear more Theme weekends and not just doing Twin Spins.

Know the market. Know the audience. Know your Core. Perception is everything. Plus, with Lake as a flanker 80s can play there. No need to push them on WMJI. Tom Kent's show... too progressive. I like Tom as a talent but that playlist... just don't agree.
 
VODood said:
Cleveland (and Akron) is an older market demographically. CLE one of the oldest Midwest markets in the Top 30. Because of this WMJI skews older than most CC classic hits stations and is successful. And, there's Lanigan (for now).

WMJI has a great music mix, for the most part. I don't agree with the 80s titles (and with PPM they can see, daily, how those titles fare).

I hear WMJI skew as old as '59 with The Contours "Do You Love Me". So they're not on an "80s revolution" per se'. In fact, Keith Abrams is very selective. Imaging is well done, tempo of the station is excellent. Action does a great job.

WMJI has tried to shave off pre-65 and add more 80s and when it does so it suffers. I've been hearing some 60s titles not heard in quite some time. Refreshing. I'd like to hear more Theme weekends and not just doing Twin Spins.

Know the market. Know the audience. Know your Core. Perception is everything. Plus, with Lake as a flanker 80s can play there. No need to push them on WMJI. Tom Kent's show... too progressive. I like Tom as a talent but that playlist... just don't agree.

Well said. WMJI is successful for a reason, and has always been that way since the early 90's. I can't picture "Like A Virgin" after "California Dreamin'" on Majic. That would send listeners away.

Plus, Majic and The Lake are focused on the decades New 102 is no longer focused on. That can also be part of the ratings success for both stations.
 
Wanna venture a guess that a good chunk of WMJI listeners will say "Do You Love Me" is from Dirty Dancing? (1987) Their memories won't be listening AM radio at a drive in. Nope. Johnny Castle putting the moves on Baby.

Cleveland is not as old as you'd think, especially in the PPM world.(WQAL/WDOK all shifted down, not up) Perhaps WMJI stays away from the 80s that most classic hits stations are banging because right down the hall is 106.5 playing a boatload of 80s and also seeing ratings success.

Nobody puts my baby in a corner.
 
VODood said:
Cleveland (and Akron) is an older market demographically. CLE one of the oldest Midwest markets in the Top 30. Because of this WMJI skews older than most CC classic hits stations and is successful. And, there's Lanigan (for now).

WMJI has a great music mix, for the most part. I don't agree with the 80s titles (and with PPM they can see, daily, how those titles fare).

I hear WMJI skew as old as '59 with The Contours "Do You Love Me". So they're not on an "80s revolution" per se'. In fact, Keith Abrams is very selective. Imaging is well done, tempo of the station is excellent. Action does a great job.

WMJI has tried to shave off pre-65 and add more 80s and when it does so it suffers. I've been hearing some 60s titles not heard in quite some time. Refreshing. I'd like to hear more Theme weekends and not just doing Twin Spins.

Know the market. Know the audience. Know your Core. Perception is everything. Plus, with Lake as a flanker 80s can play there. No need to push them on WMJI. Tom Kent's show... too progressive. I like Tom as a talent but that playlist... just don't agree.

Sorry to correct you, but "Do You Love Me" by The Contours came out in 1962. Look it up in a Joel Whitburn Book...

There is a portion of the 80's that is already moving into...and testing decently at...the "oldies/classic hits" audience group. They are "oldies" already. Period. End of argument.

And, while an older-skewed market can mean that a station must be careful about moving forward too quickly, moving forward with the music is inevitable. If...that is...you want your station to continue to make money. That is why the oldies stations started going away a number of years back. The PPM saved the format. And radio has been wise to push it forward.

I am 56. (Already "dead" to advertisers.) I graduated high school in 1974. It's time for my generation to have a station that doesn't only play classic rock artists. There were major hits on the pop side which also deserve to be heard.

People 10 years younger than me are the beginning of the 80's generation. They are 46. They're not kids. They are people pretty close to the prime of the 25-54 demo. They deserve their nostalgia as well.
 
I stand corrected on The Contours tune. I was confused with the other black group, Isley's and "Shout", which is '59, and WMJI plays as well.

@Baylor. no way to know for sure whether those 50+ would equate The Contours tune from Dirty Dancing without asking directly. Those under 40? Perhaps. Even so, doesn't matter. It's still an early 60s tune.

80s aren't oldies. I'll debate that all day long. I don't care that they're old songs. "Oldies" is 50s, 60s, 70s. And no one in their 40s wants "their" music referred to as oldies (ne' classic hits). They just don't.

As for PPM 'saving the format". It wasn't dead. It was proclaimed "dead" by witless tools inside CC including a SRVP I worked with in the South who admitted to "not getting the format". It's always been a viable format. Oldies stations were being flipped in the Southern region but in the NE and West, not a one in that time span. Each SRVP treated his region as a fiefdom. MC was horrible as a SR Programmer. Entercom and CBS, for the most part, stayed the course. CBS made some mistakes with some flips or tweaks but realized they phucked up and righted things. PPM came along and proved what most of us knew all along. That the cume was there. The numbers and demos were there.

I'm 44. Can't stand most 80s tunes. I rarely listen to Lake.
 
Maybe I'm misinformed...but, I personally know of no one under age 50 who listens to 50's/60's/70's oldies.

But, my point is...most of the national and regional advertising buys remain tied to the beauty contest demo: 25-54 (women or adults...a few buys for men).

Maybe I'm very wrong but, I can't remember the last time WMJI or any oldies station was even top 5 in 25-34 or 35-44....which is 2/3rds of the 25-54 age group...THE primary ad buy demo.
 
VODood said:
I stand corrected on The Contours tune. I was confused with the other black group, Isley's and "Shout", which is '59, and WMJI plays as well.

@Baylor. no way to know for sure whether those 50+ would equate The Contours tune from Dirty Dancing without asking directly. Those under 40? Perhaps. Even so, doesn't matter. It's still an early 60s tune.

80s aren't oldies. I'll debate that all day long. I don't care that they're old songs. "Oldies" is 50s, 60s, 70s. And no one in their 40s wants "their" music referred to as oldies (ne' classic hits). They just don't.

As for PPM 'saving the format". It wasn't dead. It was proclaimed "dead" by witless tools inside CC including a SRVP I worked with in the South who admitted to "not getting the format". It's always been a viable format. Oldies stations were being flipped in the Southern region but in the NE and West, not a one in that time span. Each SRVP treated his region as a fiefdom. MC was horrible as a SR Programmer. Entercom and CBS, for the most part, stayed the course. CBS made some mistakes with some flips or tweaks but realized they phucked up and righted things. PPM came along and proved what most of us knew all along. That the cume was there. The numbers and demos were there.

I'm 44. Can't stand most 80s tunes. I rarely listen to Lake.

Yes...younger people DO equate songs such as "Do You Love Me" as being from "Dirty Dancing". Same with Top Gun and "You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling" and Ghost with "Unchained Melody."
This is why you can play those songs even with today's pushed forward classic hits/oldies format.

I find it amusing that you say "oldies wasn't dying" when the facts are: stations were leaving the format as quickly as 2 or 3 a week. I worked for a station (not owned by CC) that actually was a hybrid (playing music from the 50's to the 80's) and very successfully so before its sale to a different company (not CC). The new owners brought the station back to a more typical 50's to early 70's format. While the ratings increased, the revenue did not. In fact, it went down...because advertisers were asking us, "When are you going to play the 80's again to get the "kids" and the "younger people"?

WCBS-FM left the format because its revenues were not what they wanted and CBS wanted to turn that around. Granted, the "Jack" format turned it around...just the wrong way. By pushing the format forward and returning the station to a "newer" oldies sound, they rocketed back into the top 5 and offered advertisers better and more salable overall demos.

Me? Personally, I like the "50's to 80's" concept. I have always said that there are a certain number of "timeless" songs that should be played by an oldies station, even if it's in a smaller proportion than before. And, a lot of people in radio can't get their arms around that.

But, I will admit...I also think the argument about "what are oldies" is a vain and selfish argument by people of my baby boomer generation. What right do we have to tell others what is an oldie? Top 40 stations in the 60's called them "oldies" when they were 2-3 years old. By the start of oldies stations, 20 years was said to the "starting point". By today, oldies stations should be playing 90's music...but the research doesn't work for that at this point. (And I get that, I personally have no nostalgia for Bell Biv DeVoe and Warrant...but I can accept that someone in their 30's and 40's just might.)

I have always said: every generation has its soundtrack. That's what made the oldies format work in the first place. I run an LP-FM in Ohio that is a "50's to 80's" oldies station. And we do have an audience, based on the well over 100% increase in underwriters since we started the format 3 years ago. But we have gotten not one complaint from a listener telling us we're not an oldies station because we're playing 80's music. I credit that to the fact that the 80's music is a component, but not the "meat" of the format...and that the folks who like the early rock music still hears Elvis and Chuck Berry, the Drifters and Leslie Gore, just to name a few.

PPM did show people would listen to oldies. But, PPM showed you could lower your demos a bit and still keep your station relevant to advertisers. The #1 cume station in the market, top heavy with 50 plus listeners will not get the big buys. And, ad money is everything in broadcasting, as you know. If the advertisers weren't there, the "oldies" would be gone.

We can all have our opinions, and that's fine. But, broadcasting is a business...and formats have to be upgraded or changed to fit the desire of advertisers, or we're all up a creek without a paddle. And, I'm just a realist. I don't see that changing.
 
Tim, I am under 50, and my favorite music library has a lot of 60s and 70s in it. I am big on Motown, very much in that time frame.

I may be unique, tho...I grant you that. :)
 
Just saw on WMJI's Lanigan and Malone page that Gloria Estefan recently appeared on the morning show. It was to promote a new reality music competition show she's appearing on The CW. No joke.

Who knows? Maybe in a few years, they'll be playing her music from the 80's. Would make some sense since The Lake leans rock and New 102 rarely plays her stuff anymore if ever nowadays. I wouldn't be surprised if some AC titles from the 80's pop up on Majic before rock songs appear.
 
Today, Thursday August 16th, the BW radio station is airing a "Van Halen" marathon. The 4 people involved are or were recently traditional (18-22 year old) students. The two current students are joined by a young lady who just graduated this year and another alum who graduated maybe 4 years ago or so. This alum co-hosted an Alice Cooper marathon last year. The girl who just graduated a couple of months ago ranks Kiss as her all time favorite group, and The Who is one of the favorite groups of one of the current traditional students I mentioned. The moral of the story is it takes all kinds. Hopefully there will be enough of the "all kinds" to make a number of formats viable.
 
johnbasalla said:
Today, Thursday August 16th, the BW radio station is airing a "Van Halen" marathon. The 4 people involved are or were recently traditional (18-22 year old) students. The two current students are joined by a young lady who just graduated this year and another alum who graduated maybe 4 years ago or so. This alum co-hosted an Alice Cooper marathon last year. The girl who just graduated a couple of months ago ranks Kiss as her all time favorite group, and The Who is one of the favorite groups of one of the current traditional students I mentioned. The moral of the story is it takes all kinds. Hopefully there will be enough of the "all kinds" to make a number of formats viable.

Kiss? If you're twenty-something and your favorite band is from the 70s, why not at least pick a good one? Kiss was and always will be a terrible band. People in their twenties do listen to music from the 60s and 70s and sometimes even earlier, but they're usually the ones who have a real strong passion for music. They got interested in Oasis and Radiohead when they were younger, and followed the chain of influences until they got to the Beatles, the Who, the Kinks, etc. The Beatles are basically on a different plane when it comes to enduring popularity, there are kids in elementary through high school who love the Beatles. I myself am 23 and have Buddy Holly, Bill Monroe, and Abner Jay in my library, along with the British Invasion groups, 70s acts like David Bowie and Lou Reed, lots of 80s groups (Joy Division, R.E.M., XTC, Mudhoney, Black Flag) and up through the 90s and today. Granted my tastes don't always lean towards the mainstream, but they're still all over the place, I mean Warren Zevon and the Wu-Tang Clan are right next to each other on my iPod. :eek:

I'm not sure what point I'm trying to make here, but I'll finish by saying I think within the next 10 years most of the 50s and 60s "oldies" will start showing up on community stations like WKHR in Bainbridge, or like WSTB on Sundays, and the big band/standards will start disappearing, as the demo that enjoys that music will be shuffling off their mortal coils at an increasing rate.
 
I agree about The Beatles. I do a Beatles radio marathon every year and every year I have requests and prize winners from all age groups.
 
johnbasalla said:
I agree about The Beatles. I do a Beatles radio marathon every year and every year I have requests and prize winners from all age groups.

You raise a good point, John. Yes...some of the music of the 60's and 70's does reach young people. I have a 22 year old nephew that loves the Beatles...(I took him to see Paul McCartney for his first rock concert). But...if I suggest I plug my i-Pod into the stereo at home (it has a radio station oldies library on it), he'll run for the exits, not wanting to hear "my music".

So for those who suggest that 60's music is big with young people...it is...to an extent. But suffice it to say for most, it's not their first choice.
 
johnbasalla said:
I agree about The Beatles. I do a Beatles radio marathon every year and every year I have requests and prize winners from all age groups.

The Beatles tend to break all the rules.
 
Thats why I dont understand why WNCX buries its weekend "Beatle Years with Bob Malik" show on Saturday from 5-6am
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom