• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Musk Calls for NPR and PBS Defunding

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can turn on a PBS station, any time day or night (except when they run game shows on the weekends) and give it an hour. You know full well what you will hear. It's going to be anti Trump, anti Elon Musk, and some ridiculous thing about climate change. All BS.
I think you should actually do what you suggest, before you jump to conclusions based on preconceived notions.
 
For example, let's take Stephanopoulos. He worked with the Democratic Party prior to entering the news field. Name me one Republican that has a similar position and audience size in the national TV network arena.
Half of Trump's cabinet.

Fox News is the "traditional news media" you rail against.
 
I read a number of similar reports in recent months, but don't save links to every article I read. Do you?

I question any source that claims to know the political party of every reporter. I explained why.

I also question why anyone would care. How one votes has nothing to do with the facts of the stories one reports. The stories one reports goes through an editorial process where the facts are checked. There are no "alternate facts."

I was raised believing every person is allowed to have their own political opinion, and that lots of people died on battlefields so I can have and state my opinion freely. Lee Greenwood sings about it in his song God Bless The USA. I stand by those rights and the rights of every American to have whatever opinions they have. Reporters are professionals and they do their jobs regardless of their opinions. Too bad some elected officials don't do their jobs with the same level of dedication to the law and the rights we all have.

This government is attacking the private rights of individuals and their professional rights as members of the press because they believe those people have differing political opinions. The constitution guarantees that those individuals and members of the press have a right to those opinions, and that the government SHALL NOT abridge those rights. Period.
 
Name me one Republican that has a similar position and audience size in the national TV network arena.

There are a lot of them who currently work at MSNBC who quit the repub party because it no longer holds the ideals of what that party once stood for. The former chairman of the repub party, Michael Steele, hosts a show there. George Bush's former communications director, Nicole Wallace, is another. There are lots of them at the other networks. Political party shouldn't determine someone's job. That's how things are done in China.

But there are lots of them. As I said, they have the right to their opinions and shouldn't be fired or prevented from stating their opinions or doing their jobs because they don't agree with the current president, who was also once a democrat.

While we're on the subject, name all the democrats who host commercial radio talk shows. Did people hold their political party against them the way the current administration is doing to other members of the press? Of course not. They're allowed to say and do whatever they want because a lot of soldiers died for them to have those rights.

By the way, since this thread is about defunding NPR, the CEO of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is a repub who was put in that position by the current president. She originally came to CPB during the admin of George Bush. She was once co-chair of the RNC. Nobody holds her political party against her.

 
Last edited:
I question any source that claims to know the political party of every reporter. I explained why.

I also question why anyone would care. How one votes has nothing to do with the facts of the stories one reports. The stories one reports goes through an editorial process where the facts are checked. There are no "alternate facts."

I was raised believing every person is allowed to have their own political opinion, and that lots of people died on battlefields so I can have and state my opinion freely. Lee Greenwood sings about it in his song God Bless The USA. I stand by those rights and the rights of every American to have whatever opinions they have. Reporters are professionals and they do their jobs regardless of their opinions. Too bad some elected officials don't do their jobs with the same level of dedication to the law and the rights we all have.

This government is attacking the private rights of individuals and their professional rights as members of the press because they believe those people have differing political opinions. The constitution guarantees that those individuals and members of the press have a right to those opinions, and that the government SHALL NOT abridge those rights. Period.
Ironic that you mention Lee Greenwood in this post, given his vocal support of the president. I wonder if he thinks "the men who died who gave their life for me" did so in hopes of seeing the press restrained in the future. Does he "defend her still today" blindly?
 
You can turn on a PBS station, any time day or night (except when they run game shows on the weekends) and give it an hour. You know full well what you will hear. It's going to be anti Trump, anti Elon Musk, and some ridiculous thing about climate change. All BS. President Trump does not like fake, dishonest media. Look what they have tried to do to him for the last ten years! If he can shut it down, the 80 million souls who voted for him will likely applaud it.
How dare any media source not praise and worship Donald Trump 24/7.
 
I question any source that claims to know the political party of every reporter. I explained why.

I also question why anyone would care. How one votes has nothing to do with the facts of the stories one reports. The stories one reports goes through an editorial process where the facts are checked. There are no "alternate facts."

I was raised believing every person is allowed to have their own political opinion, and that lots of people died on battlefields so I can have and state my opinion freely. Lee Greenwood sings about it in his song God Bless The USA. I stand by those rights and the rights of every American to have whatever opinions they have. Reporters are professionals and they do their jobs regardless of their opinions. Too bad some elected officials don't do their jobs with the same level of dedication to the law and the rights we all have.

This government is attacking the private rights of individuals and their professional rights as members of the press because they believe those people have differing political opinions. The constitution guarantees that those individuals and members of the press have a right to those opinions, and that the government SHALL NOT abridge those rights. Period.
I don't no, maybe David hasn't been to a red state, where literally Fox News is the only thing that gets through? Their content is repeated on Social Media and in church, where the Democratic Party is Satan and Donald Trump and the GOP sit on the right hand of God. I just don't buy, "there are all these liberals working in newsrooms, therefore nobody hears Fox News talking points".
 
The stated issue is that the current President is a Republican, and various surveys have shown that well over 90% of the journalists at traditional media (TV Networks, print magazines and newspapers) are Democrats.

I don't think that the administration "hates the media". I think that they... and arguably justifiably... find that traditional media is negative to it and opposed on principal to anything they propose or do.

One good thing that the current administration has done is reduce the access to overwhelming numbers of traditional media reporters while allowing "new media" reporters... many of whom represent a larger "circulation" than the old-line outlets. And it is certainly refreshing that there is a much more frequent and open access to the media (we used to call it "the press" even though nearly nobody today gets their news in printed form) by a wider variety of organizations.
Alright, what "various surveys?" I have been hearing this same lie repeated since Tricky Dick but never from an established survey research provider.

It appears that you would prefer amateurs playing at journalism online to actual educated, trained and experienced professional journalists. What's that about?
 
The congressional hearing on NPR and PBS will be held today:


The committee is chaired by Marjorie Taylor Greene, whose state receives over $5 million a year from CPB, and whose state public broadcasting authority owned several NPR affiliates and airs NPR programming all day long. The NPR CEO will be attacked for her personal political opinions that were given on social media long before she accepted her current job.
 
The congressional hearing on NPR and PBS will be held today:


The committee is chaired by Marjorie Taylor Greene, whose state receives over $5 million a year from CPB, and whose state public broadcasting authority owned several NPR affiliates and airs NPR programming all day long. The NPR CEO will be attacked for her personal political opinions that were given on social media long before she accepted her current job.
It's going to be a clown show.
 
To be clear, NPR is not a government agency. It receives government funding, but so does Tesla. The CEO is elected by the Board, and the Board is made up of NPR member station GMs. So she reports to the stations, not the congress, not the president, not CPB. Apparently Ms. Greene believes NPR is a top-down federal organization (like Congress) that tells radio stations what to do. Hopefully today she will learn the facts. If she listens. Hopefully, she will tell Ms. Greene that she could just tell her governor to shut down their public stations, or replace NPR with Maga talk show hosts if they want.
 
To be clear, NPR is not a government agency. It receives government funding, but so does Tesla. The CEO is elected by the Board, and the Board is made up of NPR member station GMs. So she reports to the stations, not the congress, not the president, not CPB. Apparently Ms. Greene believes NPR is a top-down federal organization (like Congress) that tells radio stations what to do. Hopefully today she will learn the facts. If she listens. Hopefully, she will tell Ms. Greene that she could just tell her governor to shut down their public stations, or replace NPR with Maga talk show hosts if they want.
Rep. Jasmine Crockett:
 
The title of the hearing is “Anti-American Airwaves: Holding the heads of NPR and PBS Accountable” so they've already reached their conclusion ahead of the formal hearing.

What they don't understand is that it's OK to criticize the government. People in congress do it every day. MTG did it when Biden was president. That doesn't make her "anti-American." Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech or of the press. Even if it is critical of the government. We used to call countries that don't allow criticism communists. They used to be our enemies. Not anymore.
 
For example, let's take Stephanopoulos. He worked with the Democratic Party prior to entering the news field. Name me one Republican that has a similar position and audience size in the national TV network arena.
Perhaps George’s predecessor on GMA Diane Sawyer (who worked in the Nixon White House)

Or Alyssa Farah Griffin from Trump’s first administration who is on The View.
 
Greene attacks NPR for her personal views. Says all taxpayers pay for NPR, not just their listeners:


The problem with that view is all taxpayers also pay Greene's salary. Not just the people in her district. So she and the current president should try to serve all of the people, not just the ones who voted for them.
 
Greene attacks NPR for her personal views. Says all taxpayers pay for NPR, not just their listeners:


The problem with that view is all taxpayers also pay Greene's salary. Not just the people in her district. So she and the current president should try to serve all of the people, not just the ones who voted for them.
That went out with this administration, even on the state and local level. "If you didn't vote for me, F U".
 
As expected, today's hearing on NPR and PBS was unproductive. Here's an example:

Greene, the subcommittee’s chair, indicated she plans to recommend to the administration’s newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) be totally abolished.

In point of fact, DOGE doesn't have the power to "abolish" anything. All they can do is recommend. It's up to congress to repeal the law that created CPB. Otherwise, the agency will remain. Because of the recent CR passed by congress, CPB is fully funded for the rest of the year. Congress can't get enough votes to fund the government, much less defund CPB. So they have to use outsiders to do their dirty work for them.

“The [CPB] is using taxpayer dollars to actively suppress the truth and produce some of the most ludicrous content,” she said. “Every single day, private businesses operate without government funding. You all can hate us on your own dime.”

I would say the same thing to her and the rest of the administration. They are using taxpayer money to take away the rights of journalists, educators, and everyone else they don't like. You can hate them on your own dime. Not mine.
 
This was a S*** Show as expected. It's blatantly obvious what this was all about. People like Marjorie Greene have no credibility at all. They hate NPR because they don't want fact based reporting about the current administration...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom