Then you would be wrong. The station news directors report to Suzanne Scott, and previously Roger Ailes.yeah no.. im pretty sure fox news doesnt oversee local news at fox owned and operated stations
Then you would be wrong. The station news directors report to Suzanne Scott, and previously Roger Ailes.yeah no.. im pretty sure fox news doesnt oversee local news at fox owned and operated stations
If we are mixing Fox Television Stations and Fox News divisions, then some of this is because there's a streaming network that's also running the "Fox News" name and it's Live Now on Fox. It's an all news feed that is made by the Fox Television stations division produced by the O&O division. The other Fox News as in "Live Now on Fox" do not have the political pundits connected to Musk and Trump type stuff.Then you would be wrong. The station news directors report to Suzanne Scott, and previously Roger Ailes.
Often called the "Red Zone" of news, the programming seamlessly moves between the biggest events and stories as they are happening.
Coverage and content are supported by the local station group and the vast resources of FOX.
LiveNOW is always raw, live and unfiltered, with limited commentary and no opinion.
Is there really anything that Musk hasn't called for being defunded?
The largest Texan cities are blue, though, for the most part. Houston, Austin and Dallas have blue mayors, for example.True and where will red states find “Reliable News” too when that happens. We looked at major cities in Texas and their radio ratings and their local NPR affiliates they are within the top 5-10 spots in their local markets. This data partially disproves the stereotype that people listen to Doge/maga rants. Some of this also involves in state funding and local donors in addition to CPB funding. The most famous argument mentioned here is that Texas gets a certain portion of Ex-California residents because their Employers move their main office or open branch offices in the states major cities. Not everybody in red states are like Elon Musk or Donald Trump as seen here.
![]()
Dallas/Fort Worth
Nielsen Audio PPM Monthly Ratings Dallas/Fort Worth (Market #4) Population: 7,039,700 Black: 1,254,200 – Hispanic: 2,039,600 Average Quarter Hour Share for Persons 6+, Mon-Sun 6AM-Mid All ratings are Copyright © 2005-2024 The Nielsen Company. All rights reserved. Nielsen radio audience estimates...radioinsight.com
![]()
San Antonio
Nielsen Audio PPM Monthly Ratings San Antonio (Market #25) Population: 2,343,300 Black: 187,900 - Hispanic: 1,266,800 Average Quarter Hour Shareradioinsight.com
![]()
Houston/Galveston
Nielsen Audio PPM Monthly Ratings Houston (Market #5) Population: 6,516,500 Black: 1,220,100 – Hispanic: 2,467,500 Average Quarter Hour Share for Persons 6+, Mon-Sun 6AM-Mid All ratings are Copyright © 2005-2024 The Nielsen Company. All rights reserved. Nielsen radio audience estimates and data...radioinsight.com
![]()
Austin
Nielsen Audio PPM Monthly Ratings Austin (Market #27) Population: 2,215,000 Black: 178,700 - Hispanic: 687,100 Average Quarter Hour Share forradioinsight.com
But hey, they all have cellphones and internet, right? So who needs public radio? Why do stations in the big metros, or anywhere with internet access, need any government funding? I mean, they've got websites. They've got social media. Hey, it's the 21st Century already. [sarcasm button off]
That seems to be the mantra.
True, but they're saying that the platform itself is irrelevant also. I believe Brendan Carr's direct quote is "“For my part, I do not see a reason why Congress should continue sending taxpayer dollars to NPR and PBS given the changes in the media marketplace."The challenge isn't to the platform but to the media.
True, but they're saying that the platform itself is irrelevant also. I believe Brendan Carr's direct quote is "“For my part, I do not see a reason why Congress should continue sending taxpayer dollars to NPR and PBS given the changes in the media marketplace."
The question I don't see answered anywhere is: what are public radio proponents doing to try to counter this?
As we know, the investigation needn’t have charges and can be a wild goose chase but still result in the desired result. The threats of fighting charges, of spending valuable resources defending perfectly legitimate actions is enough to force organizations without limitless resources into obedience.The CEOs of NPR and PBS have been called to testify by MTG. That will be where the fight begins. The FCC investigation is internal, and there are no factual charges yet. It's just a wild hair being launched by the chairman. So it's very early in the process.
Driving the news: Greene, the chair of the new DOGE subcommittee, sent letters on Monday to NPR CEO Katherine Maher and PBS CEO Paula Kerger, writing that "the subcommittee seeks to better understand" each news organization's "position on providing Americans with accurate information."
- In letters to both CEOs, Greene wrote that the subcommittee is concerned by the two news organizations' "blatantly ideological and partisan coverage."
- Greene asked both CEOs to testify during the week of March 3 or March 24. It's the first hearing to be announced for the subcommittee.
- Elon Musk tweeted his approval, calling it an "excellent action" by Greene.
Thanks, I was surprised at how many states don’t give any funds to public stations.![]()
How much public broadcasters receive in state funding - Current
Our comprehensive guide tracks and explains appropriations to public media in the 36 states where broadcasters receive direct funding.current.org
Here is a chart on how States fund their local NPR and PBS affiliates.
True and in some cases the local NPR and PBS affiliate are owned by local school districts and community colleges. For California I recognize that KALW is owned by the San Francisco Unified School District. KCSM-FM is owned by College of San Mateo and PBS affiliate KLCS-TV Los Angeles is owned by the Los Angeles Unified School District. It’s a case of in California we have a mix of Local Non-Profit foundations, California State University, Local Community Colleges and local school districts that own local NPR and PBS stations.Thanks, I was surprised at how many states don’t give any funds to public stations.
Thanks, I was surprised at how many states don’t give any funds to public stations.
Two of these stations, WFUV and WSHU, are owned and operated by Catholic universities: Fordham University and Sacred Heart University. For them to receive government (CPB) money violates the establishment of religion clause of the first amendment and the principle of separation of church and state.The threats over the possible loss of funding has caused four NYC area music-based non-coms to form an alliance:
![]()
WBGO, WQXR, WFUV, WSHU Form Alliance
• Four New York City-area public radio music stations are joining forces to form the Tri-State Public Radio Music Collaborative (TSPRMC), a landmark partnership between Newark Public Radio's WBGO, New York Public Radio's WQXR, Fordham University Public Radio's WFUV 90.7 FM, and Sacred Heart...ramp247.com
![]()
New York Public Stations Collaborate On Growing Audiences and Revenue.
At a time when public radio stations are facing budget pressures and the potential loss of public funding, four New York City-area public radio stations are joining forces to formwww.insideradio.com
The purpose is to share resources and develop strategies for improving funding and audience growth.
Two of these stations, WFUV and WSHU, are owned and operated by Catholic universities: Fordham University and Sacred Heart University. For them to receive government (CPB) money violates the establishment of religion clause of the first amendment and the principle of separation of church and state.
You're free to have your own opinions here. You don't get to make up your own facts.Two of these stations, WFUV and WSHU, are owned and operated by Catholic universities: Fordham University and Sacred Heart University. For them to receive government (CPB) money violates the establishment of religion clause of the first amendment and the principle of separation of church and state.