• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

NAB Supports AM Stations Using FM Translators

Allowing AM radio stations to operate FM translators “would provide listeners improved AM programming, fill-in coverage holes, so they can better serve their local communities” and help ensure the continued viability of the AM radio service, the NAB has told the FCC in a filing.
You can read more here
http://www.radioandrecords.com/
While the FCC is draging their feet with LPAM & LPFM, they entertain giving the Mega Broadcasters even more presence, and stealing even more of the publics airwaves.


Radio Rebel
Steve
www.outlawradio.us
 
I would rather see them go to local AM"s with flea power at night than to an out of town group trying to extend there programming from half way across the country.
 
dave388 said:
say goodbye to the very few fm freqs. left. :(

That's what I thought when I first saw this proposal. But I'm not nearly so pessimistic anymore...

- The translator window has already been opened & shut. There won't be another one until after the next LPFM window. AM stations can take over existing translators or translator permits, (and quite a few already have under Special Temporary Authority) but LPFMs will have first shot at new channels.

- While there are thousands of pending translator applications on file, most of them will be denied. The FCC seems very surprised at the mass filing and transfers that happened, and they're probably going to refuse to process more than ten applications per applicant. The worst applicants filed thousands of applications; well over 99% of their applications are going to go away.

- The Commission has proposed to open up more channels for LPFM service. Right now, a LPFM must be at least 800kHz from a full-power station at the same or nearby site. The presence of full-power stations at 103.3 and 104.5 makes 103.7, 103.9, and 104.1 off-limits for LPFM here in Nashville. The Commission has proposed to relax the limits on use of frequencies separated by 400kHz - that would allow LPFMs on 103.7 and 104.1 here. Frequencies that had been only available for translators will soon be available for LPFM as well.

They've also asked Congress to repeal the prohibition on use of 600kHz-separated channels for LPFM. (in the Nashville case, 103.9) The change in control of Congress makes such a repeal more likely, though by no means certain.
 
w9wi said:
They've also asked Congress to repeal the prohibition on use of 600kHz-separated channels for LPFM. (in the Nashville case, 103.9) The change in control of Congress makes such a repeal more likely, though by no means certain.

That's going to be the tough one to get fixed. It will take Congress changing the law. NAB and others will surely lobby heavily against it. It is going to take a lot of grass roots support to get anything done. Write or call your elected officials.
 
knoxbob said:
I would rather see them go to local AM"s with flea power at night than to an out of town group trying to extend there programming from half way across the country.

Agreed. In fact, many LPFM operators have a lot in common with small "mom & pop" AM stations. Other than the ability to run commercials, the concept and the usual problems are very much the same. Many of those local broadcasters are a vanishing breed, but they still exist in many communities. This might be just the thing to bring them back to life.

The next problem is actually getting a translator to use. That is not going to be so easy. As was pointed out elsewhere, the FCC has decided recently to limit the assignment of Construction Permits granted in the last translator window to ten per applicant. I'm assuming that they won't retroactively revoke licenses they have already approved, even if that applicant has more than ten already on the air.

I think about 3-4000 translator applications were approved before the freeze. Since the last CP was granted over three years ago, those who got them should have them on the air by now. The CP’s expired 36 months after the date of issue. Admittedly, there are a few stragglers who have the legal where-with-all to delay the process. The rest are presumably on the air, re-broadcasting something. That doesn't leave a lot of available translators, even if the FCC gives the green light.

Of the remaining 9-10,000 applications, a good percentage of them will be dismissed. I’m guessing 60-70% will eventually go away. YMMV. The ones that are left will be up for grabs, but there’s a catch. It is possible that not all of them can be used, even if they are available. Translator rules are very inconsistent. Some translators are licensed as commercial and some are licensed as non-commercial. Many can be changed, but it is one more hurdle along the road. Currently, translators in the commercial band are not allowed to be supported financially by the originating station, although that station may provide technical support (whatever that is). I take that to mean that a commercial station couldn’t enter into a paid lease agreement with thee translator operator. Translators in the noncommercial band are supposed to be noncommercial. On the other hand, if the originating station is in the noncommercial band, then it can own its translators, regardless of the frequency, but a non commercial LPFM can’t own a translator, although it can us one that is owned by someone else. Sound confusing? It is.

I'm sure all these technicalities can be fixed, but the big winners will be the lawyers and consultants who specialize in FCC applications.

In the mean time, who know when there will be another LPFM filing window....
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom