> > > > Im still sticking with the time warner 24 hour news
> > > > channel.If that rumor does pan out, they'll build a
> > > facility
> > > > from the ground up,like they did with News 8 Austin.
> > >
> > > You have forgotten that TW, in partnership with Belo,
> was
> > > part of two massive failures with local cable news
> > channels:
> > > News 24 Houston (lasted 19 months) and News 9 San
> Antonio
> > > (lasted 15 months.) Both were supposedly the future of
> > > local news production. Both bombed. High operating
> cost,
> >
> > > very little revenue.
> > >
> > > Such operations had a better chance of succeeding 10-15
> > > years ago (NY News 1, CLTV, Long Island 12, etc.) than
> > > today, as the sheer glut of cable channels results in
> new
> > > offerings being lost in the crowd.
> > >
> > I think you hit the nail on the head when you said....
> >
> > Belo
> >
> > Anything Belo has sunk its claws into cablewise(Save
> > NWCN)had turned into crap. The reason is simple: Belo
> > Corporate managment wants total oversight and control in
> > cable matters. With a NY1(Time Warner),CN8(Comcast) or
> > CLTV(Tribune), They are separate,independent divisions of
> > the groups they are under and are given some oversight
> into
> > their own matters(operations,newsgathering,managment),
> > something Belo doesnt like to relinquish control of very
> > easily.
> >
> I'm not sure that Belo had much say in News 24 Houston or
> News 9 San Antonio. I lived in San Antonio at the time and
> there was little (if any) cross-promotion with Belo-owned
> KENS. Everyone I knew said that TW called the shots and,
> when they finally couldn't sell enough ad time, TW shut it
> down. It apparently had little to do with Belo's management
> (or mis-management).
>
I disagree with you sir, but thats quite alright, I still value your comments
