After listening to NASH-FM and Thunder and comparing the two, you have to admit Thunder sounds so much better. While both stations play a comparable mix of country music, the local element of Thunder is a strong standout. Thunder plays local, aims local, and has the local flavor in their programming. So far you don't get that from NASH, whose only local claim to fame is their local traffic reports. Even their weather sounds generic like it was being read by someone 1000 miles away.
New York radio and NJ radio listeners are not stupid people. As a listener you want to have a local connection. Without it you're only going to get older demos and a weak advertising base. I believe Thunder has it right. It will be interesting to see how NASH programs, or re-programs. If they add more local elements it would be a step in the right direction. If they stay as they are, or do follow the Cumulus/Clear Channel philosophy of doing traffic and weather from anywhere to save a buck, then we'll know if the NASH 'experiment" will succeed or fail.
Kudos to Thunder for not losing their local flavor.
New York radio and NJ radio listeners are not stupid people. As a listener you want to have a local connection. Without it you're only going to get older demos and a weak advertising base. I believe Thunder has it right. It will be interesting to see how NASH programs, or re-programs. If they add more local elements it would be a step in the right direction. If they stay as they are, or do follow the Cumulus/Clear Channel philosophy of doing traffic and weather from anywhere to save a buck, then we'll know if the NASH 'experiment" will succeed or fail.
Kudos to Thunder for not losing their local flavor.