• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

NBC Unravels Some More

Are you going to post a new thread every time Nikki Finke blogs about NBC?

You are only posting links from this person. How about AP? Daily Variety? Entertainment Weekly?
Those are newsworthy. But only posting blogs by Nikki Finke every time she blogs about NBC is started to get a little old.

People who constantly use the words: "Basically," "Clearly," "My Bad," in their articles are not journalist and have no credibility. She also has not cited any sources, not a single one. And, as I have mentioned before, NBC has not cancelled Knight Rider, so her facts are not straight. This woman is making conjecture on already released information. She is not reliable, and is not a source of any credible news.
 
I was expecting this. Let's try to clear the air on this before it gets messy.

First, Nikki Finke is a very credible journalist. Her resume includes years spent at the L.A. Times.

Due to the clandestine nature of administrations in both the movie & TV businesses, sources, much like politics and sports, have to be protected. People could lose their jobs, especially those, and there are many, who have been forcefully signed to confidentiality clauses.

Publications like Entertainment Weekly & AP dispatches are meant for fan consumption. People like the patrons of a beauty salon waiting their turn in Davenport, Iowa, or in a doctor's office in McKeesport, Pa. Ms. Finke writes about the business side of the biz. The general public does not care about that aspect.

Daily Variety, which recently announced a large number of layoffs, reports on the biz the same way the Wall St. Journal reports on the corporate world, basically(!) just the facts, and very little opinion or commentary.

Deadline Hollywood Daily is a blog, not a publication. As for Ms. Finke's credibility, well, take a few extra minutes on her few posts that you've bothered to read and read the many comments that follow, then see if the posters tend to agree with you or not. She has no lawsuits against her, and the suits themselves have gone to great lengths to try, usually in vain, to keep internal information from her. Journalists like Ms. Finke and a few others are the ones they fear, not the Perez Hiltons of this world.

May I also suggest that you go to the main home page of DHD and scroll through the archives? Many of her headlines start off with the word "TOLDJA!" If you've read Nikki Finke over the years, in print or in cyberspace, you wouldn't question her credibility. Her track record is impeccable.

Clearly(!), you don't like her style, and that's your privilege. No one forces you to read her. Her way with the language reflects the fact that DHD is her blog, not a job under a more conventional work setting, and she's basically(!) being herself.

When R-I tells me to stop posting from Ms. Finke, I will. But not before. Don't read it if you don't like it. You're not Tipper Gore. And you speak for no one else.

It's fine that you obviously don't believe everything you read. That's a good thing. Just keep in mind that it can go more than one way.

One last thing, :) get back to me when Knight Rider is off the schedule next spring. I guarantee it'll be gone by the May sweeps, and be virtually hidden by the February sweeps. If I'm wrong, I'll shrug my shoulders and say "My bad!"
 
All you have done is post another link to the same website. My response? Who cares?

She may have been Chief White House Correspondent, but her current column is not reflective of any kind of integrity. It's riddled with "I'm so great" and "It was because of me" type statements. Please do not take kit personal, and I apologize for the veracity with which I responded but when you take her blog as the absolute final word, I feel I need to say something. She may have her pulse on the subject, but if it's not from a respectable sources (a blog is not a source), it is not news, and should not be passed off as such in a subject heading. 3 Times I was tricked into reading a thread only to find nothing but a link to her blog. Sorry, unacceptable, imo.

I'm not trying to detract from the importance of her blog (and subsequent posters to her site), as they may have some directional or inside validity. But with the type language it is written, it is not news until someone like AP reports it.

Again, this is not personal, so please do not take it that way. But everytime time I see a link to her blog, the hairs on my back stand up.
 
Thank you for your civil response. No apology needed. :)

Looks like we see things differently. My only "mission" in all of this was to post and share information. What anybody else thinks is their imperative.

All I will say for now is that it's highly unlikely that a credible wire service would post some of the stories that Ms. Finke reports mainly because the public just plain wouldn't care. I would put her track record up against anybody's. That's all.

If seeing a link to DHD makes your hair stand up, I respectfully suggest that you find something more to your liking. Rather than take an easy cheap shot insult here, I'll just say like I would with anyone to use your own judgement.

None of it is being forced on you.
 
I spent over 25 years at 30 Rock before I retired and this has been going on for at least that long. You hire and fire, hire and fire. Flying coach was always the norm except for VP and above and alcohol on an expense report was limited to one drink per person. Anything more and you paid for it out of pocket.

If you received frequent flyer miles while on business they belonged to the company. There is nothing new here except that the ratings suck. NBC is still hiring and replacing the staff that costs money with kids out of school. This is fine for small market TV but not NYC unless you crave public access TV. The union staff still has a contract is being paid well thank you very much.

Mike
 
Garrett said:
People who constantly use the words: "Basically," "Clearly," "My Bad," in their articles are not journalist and have no credibility. She also has not cited any sources, not a single one. And, as I have mentioned before, NBC has not cancelled Knight Rider, so her facts are not straight. This woman is making conjecture on already released information. She is not reliable, and is not a source of any credible news.
Ah, one of those "blogs bad old media good" haters.

"Fun? We are not here to have fun! We are not here to talk like ordinary people! We are here to report in a dreary monotone that would make Joe Lieberman blush!"
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom