136kgb said:At some point in the next 10 years I suspect the need for AM directional engineers, and transmitter engineers will be just about completely gone. When the auto manufacturers start putting internet in the cars, broadcasting is dead. There will still be a need for studio engineers, but not for transmitters. I recently got an Iphone, I listen to music, to internet radio and I don't loose the signal unless I am driving between dead zones. Once the holes are filled in with cell towers, and the car makers put the internet in the cars, it is done!
Hmmn... seems we've heard this before:
TV would be the death of radio.
FM radio would be the death of AM radio.
Cable TV would be the death of broadcast TV.
Sattelite TV would be the death of Cable TV.
HD Radio would be the death of AM and FM radio.
Sattelite radio would be the death of terrestrial radio.
And now... the internet will be the death of people needing transmitters for anything.
Of all these "x will be the death of y" scenarios put forth over the years, zero of them actually came true.
TV didn't kill radio, it merely changed the programming style. FM radio didn't kill AM radio, it merely changed the dialscape. Cable TV didn't kill broadcast TV, it merely changed shape of the programming. Sattelite TV didn't kill Cable TV, it merely provided another option. HD Radio is enjoying all the demand of AM Stereo. Sattelite radio hasn't killed terrestrial radio, in fact it's providing some terrestrial stations with feeds they didn't have before.
It will take a lot longer than ten years for any need for broadcast services vanishes from the face of the globe because of the internet, or anything else.
One thing you'll notice about these broadcast radio or TV "killers" is that they have one thing broadcast services do not have: a subscription fee. The same is true of any Internet provider, you have to pay for the service. Internet feeds are no more likely to kill broadcast radio than sattelite radio. All they will do is provide another option.
For those not living in The Big City, wireless internet is nowhere near as reliable as even sattelite radio is. Some areas of the country face serious topographical challenges that makes covering every square inch of land at microwave frequencies impossible. After all these years, there are still large swaths of land in the continental U.S. where you simply can't get cell service, let alone internet-capable cell service. Those areas are still well-served by terrestrial radio.
Until you can call broadcast radio/TV itself obsolete (and have it actually come true this time), there will still be a need for broadcast engineers. No, you're not going to get rich doing it, and chances are you'll have to have more than one station or group as clients in order to keep it lucrative, sometimes even doing it as a second job.
We just refurbished the mortal remains of a Harris FM-25K and converted it to single-phase for one client, so I beg to differ with those saying that there are no real engineers out there anymore, or that nobody is being trained under them. There certainly is a need for engineers, and a young crowd who would really enjoy working as one (no matter what you think they want), but who would want to become one when those they might learn from turn their noses up when someone says they're looking for one?
Am I the only one who sees this attitude as a bit self-defeating?
--Thom Rounds