Good advice, sorry, I thought I saw internet radio station. My bad. Good luck.
> > > might I
> > > suggest about 5 streams to start with
> >
> > They didn't necessarily say it was an internet station...
>
> Nope, and that's where my opinions come in: broadcast dance
> stations

>
> I've thought this over for a long time, and I've built in my
> mind what I think is a pretty good idea for how to go about
> something like this. Keep in mind, though, that it's really
> all just common sense (which, in this case, goes against
> conventional wisdom when it comes to most broadcast
> corporations).
>
> First, your library. It all comes down to the market you're
> in. Start building with your golds by researching what's
> been popular in your market in the past. What dance tracks
> hit it big in your area? Look at clubs, previous airplay,
> etc. Then use that research to determine what type of dance
> station you're going to build. What style and pace seems
> the most prevalent on the golds list? Start building the
> library around those attributes that are the most popular in
> the market.
>
> As far as categories go, I would drop the power category but
> keep the other three. Mix the power in with the currents,
> and that should give you enough variety when you're dealing
> with how tight the playlist will be.
>
> And that's where my suggestion for rotation comes in. As
> you said, you'll want to run lighter than a CHR, but make
> sure you don't run too light. A good example of how to
> under-play new tracks: WKTU. The 30's are no place for your
> #1 track... and I know they're skewing that way to compete
> with other area stations playing golds, but it's just a bad
> idea if you're the only game in town. Just take a look at
> what happened to Party 93.1. No, you'll want to push your
> currents, but somewhere in the 40-55 spins range... about
> the same area as KNRJ in Phoenix. Beyond the currents, I'd
> run the recurrents about 1.5 times as much as the golds.
> That should give you a good starting point to go from... but
> listen to your audience and tweak from there.
>
> One thing I'll also point to KNRJ on is promotion of new
> music... they point out every new song they play (and
> they've got stellar imaging with which to do it, too!). I'd
> do the same thing: make sure the listeners know the artist
> and title of every new track that airs. I'd say run with
> that idea for two full weeks when the song comes out, then
> add it to music promos as long as it's a current. That's
> another thing: always promote your currents. Don't
> necessarily announce them every time they play, but put them
> in music promos that include the hooks of two or three songs
> (just don't do that "my three songs" thing... that's so sad
> that I want to shoot my radio every time I hear it!).
>
> I would make mixes key during rush hours. I personally
> would borrow the "X:00 Traffic Jam" name that WPOW used to
> (and might still, I'm not sure) use. Drive time is when
> you're likely to get your most listeners if you're in a
> medium-to-major market, and they're going to want to hear
> the music, not jocks talking (although if traffic is
> generally heavy in the area, make sure you do traffic
> updates). That makes it the perfect time for mixes. Of
> course, a huge mixshow on a Friday or Saturday night
> certainly wouldn't hurt.
>
> One thing that you didn't mention that I want to drive home
> as a key element is personality. Hire jocks that actually
> know what they're doing behind the mic, not liner card
> readers who are simply warm bodies working the board.
> Lively, energetic jocks whose personalities shine through on
> the air are what you want on a dance station, and that's
> another place where many have failed (especially Party
> 93.1). This is part of what made the old 92 KTU great.
> It's also worked for Energy 92-7&5, and it's working for the
> new KTU and KNRJ today. Personality is key.
>
> All in all, look at what made previous dance stations
> successful. That's what I'm basing my ideas on here. If
> you combine the basic principles that they built their
> stations on and use them to build your own, you can't go
> wrong.
>