• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

New Afternoon Talk Host for WBT Named

Saw his website, nice radios.

Do we really need another Rush wannabe complete with ego?

You gotta ask yourself why would someone leave a much bigger market like San Francisco to come to Charlotte?

Ever been to the Napa Valley? Fantastic weather all year long.

Politics on the radio is getting old. From the article on the WBT website it sounds like they might do something a little different, at least I hope so. I would never trust anything one of these talkshow hosts said be they liberal or conservative.
 
Very true, but I don't see any successors to Henry Boggan on the horizon. I guess the closest we come to that on WBT these days is Hancock.

An observation: The personalities we view as having the most "integrity" on the WBT of the past were not doing talk shows. They usually followed the rule..."If it's important, say it, then shut up and play some music." I've never done a talk show (unless you want to consider a "trading post" in this genre), but it seems to me that to fill the time that a disc jockey spends playing records, a talk show host has to spout a LOT of things that are less than of prime importance.

Therefore, to maintain listener interest in the absence of music, most talk show hosts steer their discussions toward the sensual, the political or the scandalous. Going in any of these directions does not bode well for one's integrity. Boggan was a master at keeping an audience without drifting toward any of those areas, and because of that, most long-time WBT listeners hold him in the highest esteem.

When one analyzes the others on WBT who are most viewed with the same esteem, NONE of them did their entire show as a talk show.

Ty Boyd refuses to do a talk show. These days, it doesn't pay well enough for him, and he is a self-confessed "monologist". In his terms, a successful talk show host is a "dialogist", and can conduct a meaningful two-way conversation on the air.

H. A. Thompson attempted to do a full talk show, but aside from his occasional fill-ins for Henry Boggan, he was unsuccessful, mostly because he tried to do talk in the same way he used to mix phone conversations into his music shows. In those days, he largely allowed his callers to determine the direction in which things went, and he lacked the skills to direct a program where it was necessary to control its direction without offending people. What I remember about his shows on the old WCNT and when he returned for weekends on WBT was, in a word, boring.

Mike Collins was somewhat similar in his approach to talk shows, and for that reason the combination of him and Henry Boggan in the afternoons worked well. However, his current incarnation, Charlotte Talks on WFAE, Mike seems not to be able to carry on a meaningful conversation without a guest interview, and the personality approach which he was known for on WBT seems to be severely limited.

Talk is an EXTREMELY hard thing to do correctly, and we are not likely to see it at its best for some time to come.

Later...
Matt Smith
WGSR-TV
 
Different strokes, I guess. I used to never miss H.A. on the weekends. Got a few old airchecks of him on middays from 19-something. But Collins...he always seemed to either be talking about himself or fawning over Katerina Witt. <hmm, and I was sure he played for the other team>
 
Matt is right - a good talk show is hard word and requires resources most local radio stations can't and won't provide. The best shows in the business (whether you agree with their politics are not) have staffs of people behind the scenes - researching topics, arranging guests, scanning TV shows, press conferences and other sources for topical cuts.

Any manager who thinks you can do a successful talk show with just a warmed over disc jockey and no resources is headed for disaster.

You are right, most talk hosts talk about lots of things they know little about. The secret is they are learning at the same time you are (assuming you listen and pay attention). They often say things they don't necessarily believe - play devil's advocate on issues and topics. It is necessary to spark the conversation and stimulate the mind of the listener.

If anyone thinks its easy - try being interesting for 20 minutes at a time instead of 20 seconds!
 
Good points all.

As for me I like Mike Collins doing talk. His approach always seems reasonable, informed and comfortable. As for him playing on the other team I have always wondered about that....but no matter. He is very talented in production, MC of events and even acting.

Hancock would have to come close but I've always had a problem with him on the air because I feel like he is yelling all the time. This was even before his hearing loss.

We are not likely to see talk hosts like Henry Boggan anytime soon. He was much like Eddie Schwartz in Chicago and John Otto in Buffalo. These guys were entertaining and interesting. When taking calls or doing interviews they listened and then asked really good questions.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom