• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

New DSPX Firmware is out!

B

BofH

Guest
- Featuring a new distortion controlling parameter for the main clipper. Lower numbers are like previous versions, higher numbers reduce distortion.

http://www.audio-processor.com

Hopefully Scott can explain more!
 
The nicest thing about this upgrade is there isn't any noticable loss in loudness when you trade off the distortion parameter. It cleans up voice more than anything else.

The other key feature is an adjustment of the limiter ratios. The old setting is there, the new setting makes them sound a little more natural and they don't land as hard on vocals. You can also drive the limiters a little harder now with this feature and add more depth if that is what you're after.
 
BofH said:
- Featuring a new distortion controlling parameter for the main clipper. Lower numbers are like previous versions, higher numbers reduce distortion.

http://www.audio-processor.com

Hopefully Scott can explain more!

Our processors were designed to have a loud sound. The traditional method of doing this is with the clippers and we have always taken a route of making the clippers sound hard, popular with dance music and heavily processed formats. The vast majority of our users have liked the sound, although you can never keep everybody happy. I would say that our processors have sounded more Omnia than Orban.
To cut a long story short. Recently we have started to sell a LOT of processors into the Netherlands, a traditionally Orban country. Some of the customers in the Netherlands who are very used to 'that Orban sound' have made comments about the harshness of the clippers. Not that the clippers had anything wrong with them previously, as hundreds of happy customers prove, but the sound was not what they were used to. We decided to take a look at our clipping circuitry and see if we could add a mechanism to reduce a certain type of distortion which in term gives the box a different sonic flavour from its peak limiting/clipping.
This new piece of code attempts to reduce distortion in the main clipper by reducing the drive into the clipper based on the amount of distortion being produced by the clipper. We know that many of our customers like the hard and loud sound of the original clippers so we made a control that can leave them as they were and progressively lower distortion as the control is increased. My own personal opinion is a little loudness is sacrificed when the control is increased but we have had several users comment to me that the box now sounds louder with the less distortion settings. This just goes to prove how subjective processing is.
You can never make everybody happy but we will continue to listen to our customers and try and build/update a product to keep as many people happy as we can.

We decided to add this new clipper code to the DSPXmini, DSPX and DSPXtra
Look out for versions 1.15 for the mini, 3.0 for X and 2.1 for the Xtra

Thanks for your support. I hope to see some of you at IBC this year.

Best regards
Scott
 
Scott

I think the lack of loudness loss is because of the better efficency with the limiters at the lower ratios. I can drive the limiters harder to add some density make up for any loudness loss with the main clipper distortion control... all without objectionable sound from the box.
 
well if you think it sounds good on the dsp-x,YOU should hear it on the XTRA.just completed the upgrade.very good presets .we all know what the Ariane does, box is incredible great support from Scott and Paul..
 
So the old MB limiter ratio was INF:1 and there's now an option to select 10:1 ?

That's the only limiter option that's changed?

Just trying to work out how to compare the *old* sound vs the *new* sound (I'm not using the clippers as I'm in DR mode)

I've done the upgrade and it's sounding different even though I haven't changed any of the limiter options yet.

Seems to be a bit heavier on the bass now? Which limiter settings should I be A/B'ing with the new firmware.

:)
 
Hi everybody,

The major radiostations in the Netherlands still use the Orban's. The 8500 has just made it's appearance in the public stations and some major commercial stations. The other big market stations still use the 8200 ore 8400.

There are some local stations which use the dspx(tra) processor(countable on your two hands), but 90% of the dutch market is filled with Orban ore omnia, the other 10% is kept for the inovonics ore warsanis boxes (these numbers are just a wild guess, but are very near to reality).

@Scott, the dspxtra is a fine piece of hardware(much horsepower under the hood), but if you intent to make it suitable for the dutch / europeën market, you'll have to do something about the audio quality in general! as you know, in europe, the loudness war isn't the main thing to focus on, audio quality is!
maybe then you'll get that great market deal you're after. (the pricing of the BW boxes is very good! but people just don't want to compromise when it comes to something like quality, and the major broadcasters here in the netherlands are not waiting for a box that's still in it's "experimental fase".)

Hopefully we can expect more in the future from the BW boxes... more alternatives beside Orban and Omnia would'nt be bad at all!
 
v2 on the dsp-extra was a vast improvement.2.1 a even better enhancement. i rotate 2 boxes the Omnia 6 EX HD+FM and the DSP_extra.i don't hear four thousand dollars difference in the 2 boxes.BOTH sound great. Not sure what format you have in mind, but either box will do the job fine..usually least aggressive presets will give you the better audio quality(true for any box).the AC Matrix or ac Stereo preset sound very good.and there is nothing wrong with the CHr ST preset.Scott may have come to market too early on some of the prior presets or a code error, but so have other players...but usually that is discovered in beta testing..
 
@oldiesstation,

in my opinion, the AC presets in the dspxtra are great for "setting up the sound you want", nothing more and noting less.
if you want to make your sound "glitter" with chrystalclear highs and deep hard lows, and maintain the audioquality(as in details in the sound), the dspxtra comes not even close to the omnia 6 ore the "bigger" Orban boxes.
If you want nothing more then loudness, the BW boxes are damn good!

But if you want pure audioquality, even with a minour of drive (a go to sleep preset!) it sounds really not good enough!
i've booked more quality with an aphex airchain ore even with a behringer combinator MDX8000 maintaining a solid base in the sound!

The ariane does great things to the box, but the clippers and limiters break down the integrity of the sound.
a simple example: listen to bruce springsteen with "tougher then the rest" and obtain the striking hihat in the foreplay. the dspxtra demolisches the sound big time!
 
P.s.

please take a note that i'm not attempting to "burn off" the BW products, i know that BW still is developing their productrange.

please see my comments as a "positive tribute", which maybe you can take advantage from...
 
dutch pirate radio said:
@oldiesstation,

in my opinion, the AC presets in the dspxtra are great for "setting up the sound you want", nothing more and noting less.
if you want to make your sound "glitter" with chrystalclear highs and deep hard lows, and maintain the audioquality(as in details in the sound), the dspxtra comes not even close to the omnia 6 ore the "bigger" Orban boxes.
If you want nothing more then loudness, the BW boxes are damn good!

But if you want pure audioquality, even with a minour of drive (a go to sleep preset!) it sounds really not good enough!
i've booked more quality with an aphex airchain ore even with a behringer combinator MDX8000 maintaining a solid base in the sound!

The ariane does great things to the box, but the clippers and limiters break down the integrity of the sound.
a simple example: listen to bruce springsteen with "tougher then the rest" and obtain the striking hihat in the foreplay. the dspxtra demolisches the sound big time!

Allow me to copy a post I made to a dutch group where other dutch users of our products are discussing them. I think the posts below address some of the issues raised above.

Hi there
thank you for your comments.
I think it is probably best if you will allow me to step back a few years and discuss the ideas and thinking that went into the design of our processors.
We are based in London which has traditionally been quite an aggressively processed market so our reference point has been places like this and other aggressively processed markets like Paris. The need to be 'louder than the next guy' was very important and this was the feedback we got from friends and fellow engineers in the business. In my opinion some of the radio stations were blatantly distorted but if this was what they wanted who were we to argue. Up until recently BW has always tried to create loud boxes that sizzle and the vast majority of our customers have been happy with their purchase, some more than in fact, considering the vast savings they have made.
Here comes the twist, and the part that is relevant to some of you guys.
What I am getting at is, just because the box has been designed to sound very loud, and we all know distortion adds to loudness, does not make it incorrectly designed, faulty or plain bad. It was designed to sound that way. Now if the customers in the Netherlands are not used to that sound or do not like it then BW is at a crossroads. We either change the sound of the box completely to try and please some of our newer customers, possibly alienating the existing customers who want that loud, punchy sound or we leave the box as it is and alienate you guys who don't like the current sound.
We think the best thing we can do is to leave the box as it is but add extra mechanisms over the course of the next few updates to allow the sound to be user modified to a less aggressive and debatably cleaner sound. The new clipper control was the first of a few we are working on. If the clipper was faulty as some would have you believe then we would not have added an adjustable control, just made it fixed. The fact remains some markets and customers want that loud harsh sound and for them, who have supported us for several years we have had to leave the option in for the box to sound as it always did.

Our Dutch distributor Gert whom many of you know told me only the other day about one of his customers calling him and asking him what processor X station was using because it sounded really good. It was a DSPXtra by the way. I think some of you will like it and should try it. Just because someone doesn't like it does not mean someone else wont. Processing is personal and subjective, we all know that.

I know Orban is big in the Netherlands and is often used as the reference point. If as some of you proclaim Orban is the best why is only one commercial radio station in London using an Orban (last time I checked). The answer is simple. The Orban sound is not right for the London stations. The same is true in Paris and many other markets. I think the phrase, one size does not fit all is so true when it comes to processing and different markets. Some of you guys should visit us in London one day with your presets for your boxes and lets see how they sound in an aggressively processed market. Could be fun, and enlightening.

I know this may not be the best analogy but hopefully you get my point. A steak is a steak right. Personally I cant eat steak in France, I prefer it cooked, not raw but I would never dream of telling the French chef his steak is underdeveloped or faulty. The fact I cant eat it blue would suggest there must be something wrong with it but I know others like it so who am I tell them what is good and bad. I accept its cooked differently to what I am used to and respect its just different.

I would ask that you consider one thing before saying something is underdeveloped or not right. It may be supposed to sound that way and others may like it, even if you don't. I thank you all for your comments and we are taking them in and will do our best to try and put in parameters into our products that will allow more flexibility with the sound so the loudness of the box can be tamed down and a little more of what you want introduced.

One more time, thank you for the input and support. It is valued and appreciated. I hope to see many of you at IBC in a few days time where I would be more than happy to continue the conversation on a personal level and give you more insight into the forthcoming developments of our products, both present and future.

Best regards
Scott
 
Thanks Scott for the excellent clarification and I believe the changes have given all DSPX users the chance to tailor the box to suit their processing tastes.

Personally, I really loved the original sound so I just wanted to confirm the only change I need to make to return to my "extra loud" preset is to move the Main Clip Distortion control from its new default of 6 back to 1 and resave the preset? I don't have to change anything else at all?

Currently I'm running it on 2 but even with this minor amount of limiter control I agree with you - I personally can hear a decrease in "impact" and dynamics - it really has made the box more Orban like - smoother on vocals but some of the exiting transients and punch is gone.

Perhaps it's more noticable as I'm running in DR mode and not using any clipping, so any limiter adjustments are going to be more noticable.

Thanks again Scott for putting the effort into these adjustments - this truly sets your product above an Omnia and Orban - as they say you can never make an Orban sound like an Omnia, or an Omnia like an Orban. But I firmly believe you can now make a DSPX sound like whatever the hell you want! :) :)
 
"dutch pirate radio", are you talking about the DSP_X or the Extra?? if it's the extra i'd like to check your preset in my Extra.feel free to email it to me at [email protected]times when you try to build presets ,you get outside the parameters and things get out of whack in a hurry..The Urban preset in the extra sounds very good.no matter what the processor is, you can make it sound good or horrible,that is where the subjectivity comes into play..But dollar for dollar the Extra is a steal and that is a FACT.you never indicated what format you were, is this a commercial station or internet radio? and don;t forget that alot of cd's from record companies are heavily clipped and you can hear and see the distortion on a scope..SOURCE material is paramount before you ever start tweaking a processor.linear by far is the best way..
 
dutch pirate radio said:
@oldiesstation,

in my opinion, the AC presets in the dspxtra are great for "setting up the sound you want", nothing more and noting less.
if you want to make your sound "glitter" with chrystalclear highs and deep hard lows, and maintain the audioquality(as in details in the sound), the dspxtra comes not even close to the omnia 6 ore the "bigger" Orban boxes.
If you want nothing more then loudness, the BW boxes are damn good!

But if you want pure audioquality, even with a minour of drive (a go to sleep preset!) it sounds really not good enough!
i've booked more quality with an aphex airchain ore even with a behringer combinator MDX8000 maintaining a solid base in the sound!

The ariane does great things to the box, but the clippers and limiters break down the integrity of the sound.
a simple example: listen to bruce springsteen with "tougher then the rest" and obtain the striking hihat in the foreplay. the dspxtra demolisches the sound big time!

Hi Dutch Pirate

I can attest that the DSP-X (the original offering) is on the air at more than a few stations that take their audio very seriously, including some classical outlets where any change in audio processing can incurr the wrath of listeners far and wide.

One such classical stations noted that they received ZERO complaints when they changed to the DSP-X from a major offering (that is still offered) from another company. It was the third time the station had upgraded processing in 15 years and the ONLY time nobody complained that a change was made. There were only two comments: how the noise floor in stereo was vastly improved in a fringe location by one listener, and another who complained about the bass being too high. The engineer asked the listener where he had his EQ settings and the listener claimed "flat, except for a slight bass boost... which I've always had". The engineer asked the listener to make the EQ flat. He never heard back from that listener.

You would be amazed at how open yet competitive it is even for such a demanding format as classical.

All digital audio processors are works in progress. Look at any make/model and you will always see upgrades. What's nice about the BW processors are that the suggestions come directly from end-users.
 
BofH

Returning the main clipper distortion control to 0 will return it to the previous version (and setting the limiters to INF:1), but I encourage you to try the limiters at 10:1. I think you'll find them to be more musical and more transparent on vocals (especially sustained female voices). I would even ask for 8:1 in the next software revision, because I think that's still more than enough given the design of the clippers.
 
I definitely wouldn't call BW processors underdeveloped...

Other designers improve their products as well. Orban 8400 has gone pretty far from v1 to v3, for example. Would you call it underdeveloped? And if the designer doesn't change and improve their product for longer periods of time, does that mean that they've got it on the market perfectly developed and tested? Or that they are maybe neglecting the product and their users?

I only wish if other manufacturers would be so responsive to suggestions as Scott is and implement them in their products...


Regards,
Goran Tomas
 
BofH said:
Personally, I really loved the original sound so I just wanted to confirm the only change I need to make to return to my "extra loud" preset is to move the Main Clip Distortion control from its new default of 6 back to 1 and resave the preset? I don't have to change anything else at all?

Currently I'm running it on 2 but even with this minor amount of limiter control I agree with you - I personally can hear a decrease in "impact" and dynamics - it really has made the box more Orban like - smoother on vocals but some of the exiting transients and punch is gone.

BofH,

By reducing the Main Clipper Distortion Control to 1 (which is essentially an OFF position) you will have the sound as before...


Regards,
Goran Tomas
 
And it's now back to sounding fan-bloody-tastic!

The limiter code in the DSP-X is truly magical!

If anyone wants a listen to our stream, shoot an email to [email protected] and I'll send you the link!

:)
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom