John Holcomb II said:I don't see HD offering anything even worth listening too at this point.
At least try it before you knock it, John. I'll bet there's someone on this list who's closer to Philly who'd even loan you a radio to play with if you don't want to shell out the $100 for a Sony XDR-F1HD or something similar.
I agree with you that the commercial offerings thus far have been less than inspiring. But I do think public radio stations have just started scratching the surface of what FM HD multicasting can do for them. (If I weren't 300 miles away, I'd be happy to let you borrow the Accurian that's been collecting dust since I got my hands on better radios.)
In your market, John, FM HD multicasting is providing the only source of free 24/7 classical and jazz music over the air, as WRTI makes up for its awkward split between classical and jazz on its main channel by offering the alternate format on its HD-2. WXPN has its "Y-Rock on XPN" service going 24/7 on its HD2. WHYY has a classical-and-news service going on its HD-2.
And that's just Philadelphia - in other markets, public stations are actually doing live, local, hosted programming on HD-2 and HD-3 (WFUV in New York, for instance), or using HD subchannels to extend the reach of signal-impaired AM sister stations (WXXI here in Rochester, WNYC in New York, WNED in Buffalo), or providing niche formats like classical to areas that wouldn't have it any other way (Vermont Public Radio, for instance).
There's a middle ground between "mass success" and "total failure," and it's entirely possible that HD will end up occupying that middle ground, filling a niche for noncommercial stations with more content than available airtime, even as it withers away on the commercial side.