briancraig said:
Country needs to reach out and promote itself to the rapidly rising immigrant population.
Music tastes are formed in early adolescence. Someone who comes to the US in their late teens or beyond will keep their original music tastes for life, in almost all cases.
There is no reason why some of the above demographic groups cannot become country listeners as they become more "Americanized."
There is every reason in the world, for the reasons stated. One does not change music taste just because they learn better English. I went through the "music formation" years outside the US, and there is nothing in the world that is going to make me listen to things I do not have a taste for, such as American rock and such.
In Texas and New Mexico, country does very well with second and third generation Hispanics.
No it does not. It is more like 4th generation and beyond. The first and second generation interst is just about ZERO.
There was a time when Northern ethnics (Italians, Jews, etc.) were not country listeners. That is no longer true and country does well in places like Philadelphia, Boston, Hartford and Providence.
Italians are into the 5th and 6th generation. There are nearly no first generation alive. So none of that group is going to have musical taste formed abroad.
"Jew" is not a nationality. Jews from Ethoipia like whatever they grew up on there, and Jews from Argentina (worlds 4th largest Jewish community) like whatever they like there... so any Jew migrating to the US when over 18 is going to like the music they grew up on wherever they came from. And since country is of very limited appeal anywhere else int he world, they are not going to come here with a taste for country pre-formed.
Russians and Armenians should be a natural group to someday become country listeners.
50 years from now, if they are exposed to it... and in the 3rd generation.
But back to the topic of country in present day L.A.
If you can't sell 500,000 unique listeners who are white, middle class, between the ages of 25 and 54, have children and own their own home, you shouldn't be in radio.
First, the only stations that have a lot of "unique" listeners are religious ones and that is because they odn't listen to secular radio. The rest of the people listen to at least 3 different stations every week... and in the People Meter, coming to LA in 10 months, they are shown to listen to 6 or 7 stations a week... up to 10 in two weeks. So nearly none of the half-million is "unique" and they can be reached on other stations they listen to. For media buys, country is not needed at all.
Any advertiser who specified "white only" on a buy would be picketed, boycotted, lambasted and run out of business. I can't believe that you posted that having a "white" audience was superior... that is a wrong fact, and a racist, bigoted way of thinking. Shame on you.
Nearly every station in LA has plenty of listeners who are consumers. KLVE sells tons of Lexus cars, breaking a stereotype for many, I am sure.
In fact, except for "whiteness" every station in LA has a decent cross-section of such listeners. Hispanics and Blacks don't have children? There are no "middle class" Hispanics, Asians, Blacks, armenians, etc? Home ownership in LA is accessable to less than half the population, so that is not a criteria. Media buys are mostly laced on audience rank vs. price... and KZLA was not even top 20, so that is the key element anyway.
In any case, KZLA indexed no better on home ownership and income than KRCD in Fall of last year, so your point is simply wrong.
And, in LA, without exposure to the music, future generations will not like it, either. Someone may do the format, because it is guaranteed revenue on low expenses like all niche formats are. There will be no growth, and it will age with the populaiton, as there is no inbound migration to LA of the country lifestyle listener... in fact, they are leaving. LA will be over 80% ethnic / immigrant by 2010.