> > >
> > I can't imagine anyone being fired from a company and
> saying
> > it was a great place to work. The displacement that it
> > causes for you and your family is tremendous.
> >
> > A good sounding radio station is also one that generates
> > ratings and revenue and the Pig did neither. It was at
> best
> > an unique format for non-mainstream people who did not
> take
> > the time to fill out Arbitron diaries or frequent the few
> > advertisers that the Pig could muster, except for the
> staff
> > for the free drinks and food.
> >
> > It's the age old fight between people who live to be on
> the
> > air and the people who live to make a successful profit.
> >
> > Just because it may have "sounded" good, does not mean by
> > any stretch that it was or would have ever been successful
>
> > from a business standpoint.
> >
> > You have to ask the question, if it was such a good format
>
> > to have in the highest black metro in the country, why
> > wouldn't one of the real broadcast companies that are in
> > town, such as Clear Channel, Entercom, Citadel, or
> Infinity
> > jump on it. All of these groups have much bigger sticks
> > than Flinn and if they thought it would improve their
> bottom
> > line, they would have done it and left Flinn in the dust.
> >
> > My guess is that everyone is happy trying to make money
> and
> > not losing any and they see no way that a 6k signal
> playing
> > Pig music can be anything but a financial loser. It might
>
> > sound better than someone else, but sounding good don't
> make
> > the loan payments.
> >
> Let's see where to start with this. #1 Being fired had
> nothing to do with how good the station sounded, or how much
> fun it was to work there. I didn't say it was a good place
> to work, I said the station sounded good. Don't put words
> in my mouth. I liked working there because of the music,
> the info, the interviews and people like Marshall, Zeke,
> Tater...I could go on. Did it piss me off to get fired?
> Yes it did. That doesn't take away from the fun part of the
> job. We always had great turnouts for our promotions. I
> can't believe that you would say something like "A good
> sounding radio station is also one that generates ratings
> and revenue..." listen very carefully so you get this...a
> good sounding station...sounds good. Period. That was the
> point of my reply. You made valid points about the ratings
> and revenue, however that was not the subject of the post.
> Brian also made a good point when he said that I take it too
> personal when someone puts the Pig down. I'll watch that in
> the future, but all your babble about the business and
> revenue is mute. That's not what the post was about, it was
> about the sound of the station. I have worked in many
> markets where there were GREAT sounding stations that had no
> ratings, even stations I didn't work for! Sales and
> management have to think about those things, the
> morning/mid-day jocks don't. I am proud to have worked at
> the Pig, it was a great sounding station. Yes you are right
> when you say “It's the age old fight between people who live
> to be on the air and the people who live to make a
> successful profit.” That’s why there are different
> departments in every business. I live to be on the air,
> making the profit is someone else’s job. You have never
> been on the air have you? I don’t confuse the two and you
> shouldn’t either. As I recall you are the Redneck from
> Frayser and I am the Hippie…so we never saw eye to eye. I
> guess we never will, but the next time you reply to one of
> my post try to keep it on the same subject matter. I was
> talking apples and you are talking oranges. The bottom line
> is I think that the Pig was a good sounding radio station
> and many people agree with me on that. The business end was
> not my concern, my job was to have a good sounding shift and
> I think I did that.
Mitch,
Always love the dialogue and the differences of opinions. So we can get on the same apple cart, here is my point; sounding good is important for air talent, you should always strive to do your very best. Sounding good is moot if the format is too narrow, to boutique, too hard to sell to the general public. The marketing world is littered with "sounding good" products that did not make a dime. One of my favorite examples that they used to illustrate in class at UofM was the stainless steel, gull wing Delorean. Great concept, great design, terrible sales, now just a historical footnote. The Tucker automobile is another, and the hits just keep on coming.
The latest edition of Inside Radio points to the decline of AAA shares, Active Rock Shares and so on. It's great for the 8 track, the Ipod or the internet, but it just has a hard time making money.
Personal tastes sometimes are different than current economic reality. The many people that agree with you that the Pig was a good sounding radio station somehow didn't get a diary or buy advertising. So let's agree if we can, the Redneck and Hippie from Frayser that Flinn's station was a good sounding station. But was it a good radio station in terms of being a successful business? Absolutely not, or it would not have changed formats for the 3rd or 4th time, I've lost count. I think maybe we both can agree on that.
The morning/midday jock should always be thinking of the business side, because if the business is not good, unfortunately there will be personnel cuts and formatic changes or station sales to other owners.
Enough of this, back to work saving lives.