Speaking of the royalty wolf, can we talk about this? Is this the proper topic to do so? From what I hear, the articles in newspapers and when I read Billboard magazine in the 80s is that ASCAP and BMI are as bad or worse than the IRS. They put people in jail for years if the got caught selling tapes they recorded from albums and sold at flea markets. They sneak around bars and restuarant while pretending to be customers but are really listening to the music, estimating the square footage, counting the number of speakers and estimating the wattage of sound systems while tallying a royalties bill to bar and restaurant owners. The owner gets a bill in the mail but how the amount is calculated is kept a secret. Bar owners and restaurant owners could modify what they do to get a cheaper bill but not knowing how it is calculated keeps them in the dark. An internet site playing music is probably not making any money so I wonder if you wanted to pay ASCAP BMI and run a web site how would this be done and how much it would cost? Run the site and wait to get a letter from ASCAP BMI lawyers? Also, isn't Paul Williams the nice meek guy who sang and wrote nice soft pop songs from the 70s the head of these seemingly unfair organizations? I know artists deserve some money for their creativity but it seems unfair. (who said life is fair anyway?) So I think the people complaining about web sites not running unscoped airchecks are a bit naive. I estimate 95 percent of the public never heard of ASCAP BMI and think playing music created by others even in a business enviorment is completely free. I have a similar complaint about knowing what is under public domain and what is not, there seems to be a cloud preventing people from knowing the facts.