• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

NEW TIMES AD

Anyone see the ad in New Times last week (current issue)? A website http://www.cqrevolution.com/ took a full page ad out going directly after Clear Channel, listing every station they operate here in town and a dig corporate media in general.

Site is interesting.
 
Nurshe Jeff and I think Chitizen Quain kinda talksh like Mishelle Larshon of KFWhyEye. Kinda intershing that non-pfrofitsh and NPR stashions can run the shite free, while evil capitalisht gotta pay. What shay you?
 
A dig at corporate media, or just a smug, pissed off whiney screed?

Oh boo hoo, evil corporations.....

Giant waste of money to make someone's ego feel better.

And Michelle Larson is a twit.
 
to whom it may concern if one takes the time to follow the links to the fcc on cqrevolution.com you will find Clear Channel is not fullfilling it's obligations
in the consent decree under which it operates. Radio still sells music and if denied access to the market place the thirtyfive professionals employed
in the production of CQ Hits Vol. will suffer as will I and our culture. CQ will not engage in pay for play directly or indirectly through a label and although I would
love to sell music I am equally interested in restoring some integrity and class to the industry now corrupted by the corporate philistines that run it.
Live free and prosper and as the D Day Vets remind us freedom isn't free. Citizen Quain
 
Citizen Quain said:
to whom it may concern if one takes the time to follow the links to the fcc on cqrevolution.com you will find Clear Channel is not fullfilling it's obligations
in the consent decree under which it operates. Radio still sells music and if denied access to the market place the thirtyfive professionals employed
in the production of CQ Hits Vol. will suffer as will I and our culture. CQ will not engage in pay for play directly or indirectly through a label and although I would
love to sell music I am equally interested in restoring some integrity and class to the industry now corrupted by the corporate philistines that run it.
Live free and prosper and as the D Day Vets remind us freedom isn't free. Citizen Quain

I don't think I have ever seen such a vizarre and whacked website. An amusing aside is the quain(t) spelling of what purports to be English... "of coarse" instead of "of course." And statements about buying rights to play the music with statements like "...in your market while eliminating costly reporting requirements" ignore the fact that reporting has no real cost at all... it's done by off air monitoring or a submission of an electronic log.

For all practical purposes, they have constructed a chimera.
 
Citizen Quain said:
to whom it may concern if one takes the time to follow the links to the fcc on cqrevolution.com you will find Clear Channel is not fullfilling it's obligations
in the consent decree under which it operates. Radio still sells music and if denied access to the market place the thirtyfive professionals employed
in the production of CQ Hits Vol. will suffer as will I and our culture. CQ will not engage in pay for play directly or indirectly through a label and although I would
love to sell music I am equally interested in restoring some integrity and class to the industry now corrupted by the corporate philistines that run it.
Live free and prosper and as the D Day Vets remind us freedom isn't free. Citizen Quain

Gosh, you sure are cool, can I touch the hem of your pants?

Corporate philistines? LOL

Hyperbole much?

::)
 
Just a hunch that "CQ" isn't all too familiar with the radio business, but rather, most interested in getting his music heard (and $OLD).

Come on, right?

It's hard to take something like this serious when letters aren't capitalized when called for, punctuation isn't used as it should, misspellings etc. And if you want to bring Clear Channel's faults to our attention, you better point us in the direction of what we should be looking for rather than linking us to a lengthy Consent Decree and hope we've got nothing better to do but to read it all through.

Do some documentation on your website. We'll use the FCC link to fact-check.

The website has pretty much told me nothing.

As for the reasons why music you hear on the radio "sucks"... It's probably because: 1.) They're not playing YOUR music that you're trying to get out, 2.) You're possibly not in the targeted Demo, 3.) Your tastes don't match the majority of the listeners of the station you listen to, and 4.) You might think music research, Billboard charts, and the likes, are all wrong.

It's not any radio corporation's job to cater to local bands just because they're a local band. If you want to make a successful career out of the music business, and get your music played on the radio, you better cover all avenues that people discover music, and be a big hit in the Valley. Then you can be another Alice Cooper, Gin Blossoms, The Format, or Jimmy Eat World.

This is certainly not Hogan's (newest) idea of "local"... 8)
 
But Lauren, Quain thinks he is "entitled" to be heard on the radio. He probably grew up getting trophies for just being on the team and no one wanted to hurt his self esteem.

Now that he is out in the real world, he is all butthurt and emo because big bad evil corporations don't share his "vision"

Quain, there is no Santa Claus, and no one is giving you a pony. Redirect your pathetic whine campaign into creating music, if its good, you will find an audience, but no one owes you anything, and you are not "special"

That is how life works, sorry you can't see it yet.
 
It is already gospel that Cheap Channel is but a festering boil on the backside of commercial radio. That said, why would "Citizen Quain" even desire for his/her music to be heard on such outlets?
To "KOOL Listener Lauren": Roger Clyne will not be pleased that you left him and his Peacemakers off of your list of PHX-area musicians who've hit the big time--although personally, much as in the case of Jimmy Buffett, I personally cannot fathom the cultlike appeal. Oh, and 'The Format' does not ring a bell...must be getting old...
 
KOOL Listener Lauren said:
The website has pretty much told me nothing.

As for the reasons why music you hear on the radio "sucks"... It's probably because: 1.) They're not playing YOUR music that you're trying to get out, 2.) You're possibly not in the targeted Demo, 3.) Your tastes don't match the majority of the listeners of the station you listen to, and 4.) You might think music research, Billboard charts, and the likes, are all wrong.

I belive you nailed it, KLL.

I listened to a couple of tracks on Kwai Chang Quain's website and they absolutely make me want to hurl. The last time that happened I was playing a song on the air that some local musician and producer thought would hit it big. It hit it big, alright, and broke into a thousand pieces when the record hit the wall. I even burned the cart after playing it...it was that bad. ;D
 
KOOL Listener Lauren said:
Just a hunch that "CQ" isn't all too familiar with the radio business, but rather, most interested in getting his music heard (and $OLD).

Come on, right?

It's hard to take something like this serious when letters aren't capitalized when called for, punctuation isn't used as it should, misspellings etc. And if you want to bring Clear Channel's faults to our attention, you better point us in the direction of what we should be looking for rather than linking us to a lengthy Consent Decree and hope we've got nothing better to do but to read it all through.

Do some documentation on your website. We'll use the FCC link to fact-check.

The website has pretty much told me nothing.

As for the reasons why music you hear on the radio "sucks"... It's probably because: 1.) They're not playing YOUR music that you're trying to get out, 2.) You're possibly not in the targeted Demo, 3.) Your tastes don't match the majority of the listeners of the station you listen to, and 4.) You might think music research, Billboard charts, and the likes, are all wrong.

It's not any radio corporation's job to cater to local bands just because they're a local band. If you want to make a successful career out of the music business, and get your music played on the radio, you better cover all avenues that people discover music, and be a big hit in the Valley. Then you can be another Alice Cooper, Gin Blossoms, The Format, or Jimmy Eat World.

This is certainly not Hogan's (newest) idea of "local"... 8)

Jimmy Eat World is horrible. Linkin Park whom you did not mention are good, although they are not my style. Im not down there but I will stop back in a few months. The state of Arizona now only has one good relevant band, and that is Calexico. Otherwise the scene is dead. Giant Sand is good too and if Im not mistaken there is a connection between the two bands. But, getting back to the article, any movement against Clear Satan or Faux News is supported by me.
 
Ummmmmmm radiorenegade, Linkin Park is not really an AZ band. Just because the lead singer is from here does not make his band an AZ band. They are all Cali natives.
If you're going to call Linkin Park an AZ band, then I guess Fleetwood Mac is also an AZ band because Stevie Nicks is from here, right? ;)

But you guys did forget The Refreshments, The Tubes and the Meat Puppets!!!
 
stating the obvious this is a radio centric site but a few have failed to get the point of Why Music Sucks for you. I am sympathetic to the thousands laid off by fear channel to pay 400 million to the anti- American paranoid radio personality. returning from a fiffteeen yr. sabbatical i do not claim yo be an authority but i did read the consent decree and i have had the pleasure of partying with indie promoters so i know a little about the biz. for the recently educated a philistine is one with no appreciation of art i noticed no one defending clear channel or refuting the accuracy of my statements.
i don't expect every one to enjoy my music or especially me. I am a culture warrior and i like to f**k with big shots cause i can. luv the chatter
citizen quain
 
Citizen Quain said:
stating the obvious this is a radio centric site but a few have failed to get the point of Why Music Sucks for you. I am sympathetic to the thousands laid off by fear channel to pay 400 million to the anti- American paranoid radio personality. returning from a fiffteeen yr. sabbatical i do not claim yo be an authority but i did read the consent decree and i have had the pleasure of partying with indie promoters so i know a little about the biz. for the recently educated a philistine is one with no appreciation of art i noticed no one defending clear channel or refuting the accuracy of my statements.
i don't expect every one to enjoy my music or especially me. I am a culture warrior and i like to f**k with big shots cause i can. luv the chatter
citizen quain

Oh joy, you are a martyr as well, back from your sabbatical to teach us all! ::)

I'd love to hear the music I like on the radio, so, I go on line and listen to Radio Free Phoenix. But, I really don't want to hear some megalomaniacal guy's music just because he whines, buys and ad and goes on some anti-corporate rant.

Clear Channel is what it is, don't like it? Don't listen.

But your little whinefest is tiresome at best, focus on your music more and less on your whining.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom