Re: Twaffic Blows From One Who Should Know
Very well put. It is laughable how this obvious employee of Traffic.com puts posts trashing KYW and praising the people who work at Traffic.com. It is very transparent. Look, nobody is going to be right ALL of the time. But I think that Metro, or Shadow Traffic, or Smart Traveler, or whatever the hell they are calling themselves...I think that they are very accurate most of the time. And I think it is a very good point that the people that they have reporting are not out of work DJs, but actual traffic reporters who know the area. I know that when I drive to and from work, I feel confident that Sam Clover and John Brown know their stuff, and will tell it like it is, with accuracy. Traffic on radio still has credibility, in my opinion, because most radio stations still use Metro. TV is another story. Most TV stations are now with Traffic.com, and I think they are more about looking good than being accurate. Unfortunately, that is the direction that TV traffic is going in.
> Apparently, PENNDOT did take care of the tree and the
> traffic, and rather quickly, too.
>
> KYW's Traffic reports are provided by Metro Network's Shadow
> Traffic.
>
> Shadow Traffic:
>
> Does their traffic reports LIVE (not pre-recorded);
> Using experienced traffic reporters (not out of work DJ's);
> Who live and work in the metro area on which they report (no
> out-of-towners)
> and, therefore, know the metro area on which they report;
> Are able to see traffic cams as they report and therefore
> are "saying what they are seeing," (rather than reading off
> a web-page generated somewhere else).
>
> "valkyrie777" can be excused for his comments; he really
> does not know about traffic reporting. You see, he is a
> local DJ who currently works for a small competitor of
> Shadow Traffic called Traffic.com. They have found ways to
> cut the cost of doing traffic reporting (although they still
> have been reporting a loss). So, Val sits in a little room
> in Chesterbrook looking at a web page and recording traffic
> reports for the company's one radio client in New York (in
> contrast, Shadow Traffic has about 30 clients up there).
> Traffic.com does not have the same resources as Shadow, so
> if a tree falls on an expressway, he may not even see it on
> his web page at all; and if the tree is removed before
> somebody gets there, they won't be disappointed to find it
> gone.
>
> But if Val does see something about the tree on his
> web-page, by the time his pre-recorded report airs the tree
> is likely long gone any way (which means somebody driving
> to Ikea by Newark Airport will be disappointed).
>
> Maybe it's better for Val not to say anything about the tree
> at all. Maybe that's why he keeps rattling off traffic
> statistics (while Shadow describes what's happening).
>
> If a tree falls on an expressway and no one hears about it
> on the radio, does it still block traffic?
>
> Part of the reason for the time-lag in his reports may be
> Val likes to record several reports ahead so he has time to
> read the paper, post idle flattery about co-workers on radio
> boards or look for another job. He may need to find one.
> The station he records reports for is WLIB/Air America Radio
> and they may not be able to sell enough bumper stickers to
> keep themselves going (and Val employed).
>