At first, I was skeptical about Jodie Mac's show, but it turns out that I really like it. Although the whole WIP concept of 2 minute limits, no interviews, opening up topics beyond sports, etc., has some merit, I think that it gets very repetitious. I think the real advantage that Jodie Mac has over the other station is his ability and willingness to interview others, whether its an athlete, coach or another media member. The one downside is the fact that he's too nice and leaves some callers on too long. Too many of the same callers, also. This was the problem that WIP addressed when they implemented their limits years ago. Unfortunately, the other alternative (Eskin) is grating. I realize that he's very popular, but his act does wear thin.
As for the station, I think that it can be successful, but they do need to become more local, especially in morning drive-time. It'll take time, which they may not have.
> They're bringing in a guy who has a track record of success
> and who obviously has an idea of what he's doing. Got to
> give Greater Media credit this time for making a good
> decision. Not sure though if it will be enough to take down
> WIP but hopefully they'll cause some problems for them and
> make Philly sports radio a little more interesting.
>
> Speaking of that, what does everyone like/dislike about
> WPEN? I like Jody Mac but think they need more local
> programming. What else does this station need to compete
> with the powerhouse down the dial?
>
> > Per R&R, WPEN has hired a new PD with experience running
> > several ESPN radio affiliates. Jason Barrett has recently
>
> > been producer of the Dan Patrick show on ESPN. Sounds
> like
> > they're trying to make a commitment to the sports format.
> > Wonder if a local morning show will come form this, and
> > other changes?
> >
>
