> For all the complaining about Barnstable on this board, they
> and WALK are the only ones who at least try to do a
> serious job of reporting the news. Granted, a lot of this
> "coverage" is rewriting Newsday or News12 or the Associated
> Press. But at least it's something.
>
> It's economically unreasonable these days to maintain the
> large news departments that WGBB/WGSM and WHLI once had.
> And today's listeners don't miss what they never had.
>
> But in this season of license renewal, it's something to
> think about.
>
Agreed. I most recently served as the News Director for a small cluster on Eastern Long Island. They had been running CNN newsbreaks during morning & afternoon drive, (2 minutes in the AM, 1 minute in the PM), when they brought me on board to add 1 minute of local news headlines to the AM and 30 seconds the PM, leading into the national feed. Local weather and sports reports were given by the air staff during their shifts. The local news was very well received, not only by listeners, but local advertisers and the local law enforcement community. It's an excellent way to provide a public service and presence to your listening community. For example, during the Asian Tsunami and Hurricane Katrina, we not only did stories on local relief efforts and fundraising (which also count as live mention PSA's), but how our listening area could be affected by such a natural disaster, being that we are a coastal community (surrounded by water on three sides!). It helped make thosee national stories more personal to our audience. I think that stations that don't provide local news are doing a great disservice to their listeners.