• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Newsweek Article Rips AAR

An article in the current edition of Newsweek paints a blistering portrait of Air America Radio. Citing sources ranging from the bankruptcy report to the disparaging statements of former AAR executives and staffers, the article’s only positive statement is contained in opening paragraph when the writer, Matthew Phillips, acknowledges that there are “reports of potential buyers ranging from a group of investors led by two Showtime executives, to a small obscure media
company.”

Phillips confirmed AAR’s claim “that a letter of intent has been signed by an undisclosed potential buyer, and that negotiations have now turned to drafting a purchase agreement to divvy up the $20 million of debt the broadcaster owes to a roster of more than 100 creditors.”

From that point on the article recites a litany of complaints about AAR. Many of them well reported on this blog and in other sources over the past month. The article includes the some of messy highlights from the bankruptcy statement

A look at Air America’s bankruptcy filings offers insight into an impatient network that seemed bent on catching up to such industry mainstays as Rush Limbaugh practically overnight. Air America certainly spent like the big boys. Included among its $4 million of assets is a combined $1.2 million in broadcast and recording equipment, computers and office furniture. It still owes $327,000 in back rent on the sprawling 2,200-square-foot studio in New York's Chelsea area it built in 2005, as well as $1.4 million in wage and severance claims to on-air talent and high-priced executives. Franken alone is owed more than $360,000.

The article also criticizes some of AAR’s other well known problems such as the large salaries paid to “stars” like Al Franken and Janeane Garofalo, that there never was a realistic business plan, that pay checks were bouncing, and that morale at the network was eroded when executives decided to cancel popular shows like “Morning Sedition” and the “Mike Malloy Show.”

However quoting a named source, former AAR producer Martin Lynch and a unnamed former AAR executive, the Newsweek expose also reveals some lesser known observations about the beleaguered liberal talk radio network. Lynch claims that programming shakeup at AAR was a key factor in the networks demise.

“That was the straw that broke the camel’s back,” says Lynch. “They cut the legs out from under us and upset a lot of listeners. The next quarter’s ratings were nonexistent, and we were getting a lot of angry letters from listeners saying we’d canceled their favorite shows. From then on we knew we were done for.”

Lynch also cited the morale problem among low-paid staffers.

“We were getting paid peanuts, sometimes not even that, while these executives were making six figures and up.”

Probably the most damaging statement in the article is attributed to a unnamed former AAR CEO. Your guess is a good as mine about who that might be. I just have hunch his initials are DG. The source states:

“There was never a realistic business plan that appreciated the difficulty of building a 24/7 radio network from the ground up,” He said that in the beginning, the network was plagued by infighting between those who saw it as a political cause that would take years of dedicated subsidizing, and those who saw it as a viable business venture capable of turning a profit off the bat. “The latter group of people were deluding themselves,” he said, noting that the programming costs never came close to matching up with revenue opportunities, particularly as companies such as Microsoft, Wal-Mart, Visa and Exxon began pulling advertising from Air America affiliates…It was doomed by their lack of realism.”

Ironically, it was Michael Harrison, usually a gadfly about liberal talk radio who struck the most optimistic note.

“This has nothing to do with the viability of liberal talk radio,” Harrsion said. “It has to do with them not running an effective business model and with people like Al Franken not living up to the hype. If they’d hired broadcasters instead of a bunch of comedians, they would have had a chance of succeeding.”
 
Newsweek: Dead Air?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16253873/site/newsweek/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16253873/site/newsweek/page/2/

Dead Air?

Less than three years after launch, Air America's last hope lies in finding a white knight.

Web Exclusive
By Matthew Philips
Newsweek
Updated: 1:57 p.m. CT Dec 17, 2006

Lynch says a key mistake was that Air America never hired a program director to keep radio hosts, many of whom had little or no broadcast experience, focused and on message. “A local radio station not having a program director is a bonehead move,” said Lynch. “For a national radio network not to have one, that’s like shooting yourself in the foot and trying to ski downhill.”

The result, says Lynch, was a constant state of dysfunction, as on-air talent, often comedians such as Franken and Janeane Garofalo, clashed with producers.

[Click links above for the complete magazine article.]
 
barooosk said:
“This has nothing to do with the viability of liberal talk radio,” Harrsion said. “It has to do with them not running an effective business model and with people like Al Franken not living up to the hype. If they’d hired broadcasters instead of a bunch of comedians, they would have had a chance of succeeding.”


ouch!

"Some people at Air America assert that, under Mr. Glaser and the team he put in place, the network was top-heavy with management, inept at selling ads, unwilling to make program compromises that veered from the liberal message and overstaffed with more than 100 employees when two dozen would have sufficed."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/b...64f38630e&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

Yikes. When the NY Times cant cover up the stink, it's time to finally accept AAR as a failure.

Sorry, boys. Put that can of new Coke and your XFL jerseys in that Err Amerika totebag ( you know, the one you bought to 'save' the network ) and try to 'move on'.

:D :D :D :D
 
Scott Allen Miller of WRKO talks about Air America's problems in his blog

http://www.wrko.com/goout.asp?u=http://iamscotto.blogspot.com/

(scroll down to see that entry).

He points out that yes, these stations were placed on inferior signals, etc., but the likes of Rush had to
deal with that problem too. And he questions the idea of lack of promotion by CC:

"Clear Channel's alleged neglect of its prog talk stations in Boston should be the envy of anyone in talk radio. The outdoor advertising budget for these stations must have been in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Many of its personalities have had long, glowing features written about them in the Boston Globe while the embarrassing incidents -- such as Randi Rhodes' two references to wanting to shoot President Bush -- never made it to print. If my show was neglected as much as Al Franken's show has been, my ratings would double."
 
This hatchet job isn't in the current edition, or any other edition of Newsweek. It's on-line only and appears to rely mostly on Brian Maloney ("a small obscure media company") and a disgruntled ex-employee who hopes to be the right's next Bernie Goldberg:

the network was starting to make modest gains in ratings and establish loyal audiences by mid 2005. The high point came in the fall of that year. “Ratings were starting to peak at 1.5 and 1.7 shares in some markets,” says Lynch. “We were pumped.”
But then came the cancellation of three of the network’s most popular shows, “Morning Sedition,” “The Mike Malloy Show” and “The Kyle Jason Show.” “That was the straw that broke the camel’s back,” says Lynch. “They cut the legs out from under us and upset a lot of listeners. The next quarter’s ratings were nonexistent, and we were getting a lot of angry letters from listeners saying we’d canceled their favorite shows. From then on we knew we were done for.”

Huh? Morning Sedition was canceled in December 2005. Mike Malloy was canceled more than eight months later, on August 30th, 2006. So when was this "next quarter?" It couldn't have been after Malloy was canceled. And Kyle Jason was one of the network's "most popular shows?" Please. He filled time late on Saturday nights. As for the ratings, some stations have gotten twice the shares that are mentioned and overall the ratings have remained about the same or actually increased in most markets.

Also: AAR supposedly made a big mistake by hiring "comedians," but also canceled Morning Sedition, one of its "most popular shows," which featured comedian Mark Maron. Which is it?

There's a lot to criticize about Air America, but this article is so wrong in so many ways that it's hard to take seriously.
 
Not hard to see a hatchet job

Who owns Newsweek? The Washington Post Company -- whose namesake newspaper is, by its own admission, a mouthpiece for the U.S. government.

Any news story that originates in Newsweek is automatically suspect.
 
I thought the Washington comPost was supposed to be liberal-leaning, much like NYTimes and Boston Globe.

They admitted being a mouthpiece for the govt.? For the next couple weeks you have two branches in Republican hands but soon the legislative branch will have Dems given the upper hand; so... in the past few years, that would mean they would have been leaning to the Right. Hmm...? Washington Post,
that well known conservative paper! ;D
 
Any news story that originates in Newsweek is automatically suspect.

So, the Koran flushing incident didn't happen then.

Nor was Dick Armitage outed as the Valerie Plame leaker.

Nor did Matt Cooper talk to Karl Rove about Valerie Plame.

Nor did the US let bin Laden slip away.

(All those stories originated in Newsweek exclusives.)

That's good to know. I shall no longer take Newsweek on its face. So, any Bush criticism is ineffective.

Most excellent news. Thank you, Chucky.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom