• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Nexstar Media’s KTXL proposed plans to get Tegna’s KXTV


Note currently Tegna’s KXTV is the ABC affiliate in the Valley and Nexstar’s KTXL is the current Fox affiliate in the area. This is one of many places where Nexstar and Tegna will end up with a Duopoly if approved. However in Sacramento specifically if the Nexstar/Tegna deal is approved that would mean one of the stations either KXTV or KTXL will have to send ABC or Fox to Hearst owned KQCA. This is because Nexstar is the owner of the CW Network and they have the final say who gets to be the affiliate of this network. This is one of many places where affiliation changes could happen if approved. San Diego is the other one because Nexstar got KUSI-TV as part of the move to get the CW affiliation from KFMB-DT 8.2 to KUSI-TV.
 

Note currently Tegna’s KXTV is the ABC affiliate in the Valley and Nexstar’s KTXL is the current Fox affiliate in the area. This is one of many places where Nexstar and Tegna will end up with a Duopoly if approved. However in Sacramento specifically if the Nexstar/Tegna deal is approved that would mean one of the stations either KXTV or KTXL will have to send ABC or Fox to Hearst owned KQCA. This is because Nexstar is the owner of the CW Network and they have the final say who gets to be the affiliate of this network. This is one of many places where affiliation changes could happen if approved. San Diego is the other one because Nexstar got KUSI-TV as part of the move to get the CW affiliation from KFMB-DT 8.2 to KUSI-TV.
Well. It could be a different situation entirely. Nexstar could keep both FOX and ABC, now that the rule about the owning more than 1 of the top 4 stations has been apparently thrown out. If they really want to keep the CW in house, they could simply put it on 10.2 or 40.2 (if they can manage to get agreements in place for carriage on the paid providers though negotiation or what I like to call "blackout blackmail" upon renewal). Then KCRA and KOVR can duke it out with their respective news heavy sister stations, KQCA and KMAX.

The unfortunate thing for the viewers from all of this would be a consolidation of KXTV and KTXL newscasts. Or they can do what is done in other Nexstar markets and share resources with separate news casts and IDs like in Fresno.
 

The last time KXTV changed affiliation was in 1995 when they switched from CBS to ABC because it was part of Disney wanting a new slate of affiliates in some parts of the country as part of the Disney/ABC deal and it resulted in KOVR to switch from ABC to CBS in that transaction. However this proposed Tegna/Nexstar is different as mentioned here and it can go either way and it revolves around the CW Network going either way to KXTV or KTXL.
 

Here are the Nexstar cuts so far Baton Rouge, Memphis, Chicago, New York and Los Angeles have declared layoffs at Nexstsr operations in those places. So far we have to wait for layoffs in Sacramento over the proposed Tegna/Nexstar merger. Also we have to wait for a location on where will the merged staff be when one of Tegna, or Nexstars Sacramento offices shut down because of the merger.
 
The last time KXTV changed affiliation was in 1995 when they switched from CBS to ABC because it was part of Disney wanting a new slate of affiliates in some parts of the country as part of the Disney/ABC deal and it resulted in KOVR to switch from ABC to CBS in that transaction.

Yes on when, no on why.

Belo owned KXTV then and had been discussing switching it to ABC for three years previous. There is a quote from then-GM Jim Saunders in the part of this article that is free access at Newspapers.com:

Again, I have to quote my mantra: Research, research, research. In this era, what one thinks they remember is often at odds with what really happened.
 
Yes on when, no on why.

Belo owned KXTV then and had been discussing switching it to ABC for three years previous. There is a quote from then-GM Jim Saunders in the part of this article that is free access at Newspapers.com:

Again, I have to quote my mantra: Research, research, research. In this era, what one thinks they remember is often at odds with what really happened.
True too when KXTV and KOVR changed affiliations in 1995 it happened to take place at the same time there were multiple affiliation changes around the country. Yes I mean the 1994-1996 wave of affiliation changes where the big one was when KNXV-TV Phoenix switched affiliations from Fox to ABC because New World Communications signed a deal with Fox to make KSAZ switch from CBS to Fox in that deal. In turn EW Scripps owner of WXYZ-TV and KNXV had signed an affiliation deal with ABC that included WMAR getting flipped to that network. Likewise St Louis had similar situation when KTVI flipped from ABC affiliate to Fox and KDNL flipped from Fox to that areas ABC affiliate. I just had no idea how to tie the affiliation switch of the 1990's situation in Sacramento specifically given that New World Communications had no role in the affiliation switches in the Sacramento TV market like they did in other parts of the country.






 

Here are the Nexstar cuts so far Baton Rouge, Memphis, Chicago, New York and Los Angeles have declared layoffs at Nexstsr operations in those places. So far we have to wait for layoffs in Sacramento over the proposed Tegna/Nexstar merger. Also we have to wait for a location on where will the merged staff be when one of Tegna, or Nexstars Sacramento offices shut down because of the merger.
Anything is po
 
Deal is closed. Just a hunch on my end, but I think operations will be consolidated at KTXL 40 on Fruitridge. KXTV 10 currently sits on a real attractive piece of property that spans a large city block on Broadway that's worth a good chunk of change. I could see some dense residential with ground floor restaurant/retail eventually going in there.

Seeing Nexstar's recent rocky relationship with ABC, I could see KQCA abc58 happening or possibly KCRA abc3.2 and a gutted CW10.




 
Deal is closed. Just a hunch on my end, but I think operations will be consolidated at KTXL 40 on Fruitridge. KXTV 10 currently sits on a real attractive piece of property that spans a large city block on Broadway that's worth a good chunk of change. I could see some dense residential with ground floor restaurant/retail eventually going in there.

Seeing Nexstar's recent rocky relationship with ABC, I could see KQCA abc58 happening or possibly KCRA abc3.2 and a gutted CW10.





But the State of California AG has filed a lawsuit against Tegna and Nexstar. All the things we are thinking about may be delayed for some time such as moving staff to one of their offices and in Sacramento possibly change affiliations such as Nexstar obtaining CW affiliations since they own that network.
 
I don’t see Nexstar dropping ABC because of reach and revenue. It would only be KXTV or KTXL were one of the 6 stations they agreed to devest.

The only reason I could think of was if they still were drinking sour grape juice after the Kimmel kerfuffle that they were a major player in. Still, absent a divestiture, wouldn't they still have to wait until their affiliate agreement is up for renewal?
 
Yet they were significantly driven into this by the fact that satellite signals don't do well indoors, and they were losing "first choice" preferences to streamers. Add in modern dashboards with streaming, and that was a big challenge to them.

But the real issue for many is that the satellite channels are one-for-many, and often play songs each of us don't much care for. While SiriusXM has cut down the old Lee Abrams extended playlists "because satellite listeners want more variety". Actually, satellite listeners wanted no commercials, which is why all the music channels done in-house eliminated them after about 2 years.

The only reason I could think of was if they still were drinking sour grape juice after the Kimmel kerfuffle that they were a major player in. Still, absent a divestiture, wouldn't they still have to wait until their affiliate agreement is up for renewal?
That would be my thought. I’m curious on the length of that said affiliate agreement.
 
That would be my thought. I’m curious on the length of that said affiliate agreement.

I believe a copy has to be kept in the station's Public File and the only redaction allowed is proprietary information (such as station revenue) so the end date of the current agreement for KXTV would have to show.
 

Interesting but not shocking given that Nexstar is protecting NewsNation. Likewise its "Newsnation Sacramento", "NewsNation on Fox40" or "NewsNation on ABC10."

Word is that Nexstar is looking to rebrand the stations, when it comes to news. And it will likely come under the “NewsNation” banner?

A Nexstar source tells FTVLive that this, “Solves their problem of now owning multiple news-producing affiliates in the same market. It lets them hub everything GFX wise. After all, aren’t they laying off all their creative services folks? And it gives their anemic NewsNation cable channel free PR every time a local anchor says that brand.”

There is still talk of the exact branding. Do they just go with “NewsNation” or, like in Cleveland, “NewsNation Ohio” or “NewsNation on FOX 8” and “NewsNation on Channel 3”?


Here we go a clash between Governor Newsom and Chairman Carr over the Nexstar Tegna merger. Yes not just because of media concentration but also the lawsuit is in Downtown Sacramento with 7 other states + Directv filing similar allegations of antitrust given that its one of the TV markets around the country affected by the deal.

The merger, which would create a broadcast giant of nearly 260 stations across the country, got clearance from the FCC and the Justice Department last week. Nexstar then quickly announced that its deal to acquire Tegna had closed.

In giving the deal the greenlight, the FCC’s Media Bureau granted Nexstar a waiver from the agency’s national media ownership cap, which limits any one entity from amassing stations covering more than 50% of the country. The Nexstar-Tegna stations reach 80%.

“I think it’s a disgrace. I think Brendan Carr is a disgrace,” Newsom told a reporter earlier this week. “I think what’s going on in this country is a disgrace. Eighty percent of a household share, a waiver? This is the same Brendan Carr who has said he wants Dear Leader to have better coverage, or he is not going to approve or renew broadcast licenses.”
 




Interesting but the California AG is the one that filed the lawsuit here in Sacramento to get the courts to investigate the Nexstar/Tegna deal because the Sacramento TV market is one of many TV markets around the nation affected by this deal. Hollywood has nothing to do with this given that also the California AG has issued an investigation on the WB/Paramount deal being pushed by the Ellisons in a different investigation.

Brendan Carr hit back at Gavin Newsom’s criticism of the FCC’s Nexstar-Tegna merger approval, claiming the governor was merely “doing the bidding of his liberal Hollywood donors.”

The FCC chairman issued his scathing response to Newsom on X Wednesday evening, where he suggested that the California democrat didn’t have “any legitimate interest” in the recent deal.

“Gavin Newsom isn’t standing up to me for any legitimate interest,” Carr wrote in his X post. “He’s simply doing the bidding of his liberal Hollywood
donors—the billionaires in media who have no interest in the FCC holding them accountable to their statutory public interest obligations.”
 


Back
Top Bottom