• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Nexstar ready to hook up with TEGNA?

I just saw the FCC filing. It includes an attachment titled "REDACTED - Project Nimbus - Comprehensive Exhibit (with attachments).pdf" in which Nextstar is asking the FCC to give them Wavers of the Ownership Rules if the Rules are not changed and tries to justify it as being in the Public Interest.
The long filing has a market by market justification for the merger. I don’t recommend reading the whole thing, as the same arguments are repeated over and over. But you might want to search for your own market (or one you are interested in) to see what their thinking is for those particular situations.

Denver is one to keep an eye on, as Nexstar wants a quadropoly in the market.

It has been pointed out on other forums that various stations Nexstar operates through sidecar companies aren’t mentioned in the filing. The section for Austin doesn’t include KNVA, for example. Oddly, KNVA is where The CW airs in the market.
 
Newsmax has asked the FCC to deny the merger of Nexstar and Tegna.


Last month, Newsmax got the attention of the president by saying it opposed any loosening of ownership caps.

 
Last edited:
Newsmax has asked the FCC to deny the merger of Nexstar and Tegna.


Last month, Newsmax got the attention of the president by saying it opposed any loosening of ownership caps.


Then Newsmax is doing the right thing for once-- this merger would just about put the coffin in local news, and turn it into just another FOX "News."
 
And now, the idiot-in-chief has done a 180 and endorsed the deal:


What passes for logic in his addled brain tells him that approving the merger "will result in more competition".
🙄
 
And now, the idiot-in-chief has done a 180 and endorsed the deal:


What passes for logic in his addled brain tells him that approving the merger "will result in more competition".
🙄
TEGNA or Nexstar must have gave him their "Kickback" to get the merger approved.
 
Corey Hutchins at Colorado College in Colorado Springs points out a crucial difference between Tegna's approach to news coverage and Nexstar's approach. In his weekly Inside the News in Colorado, Hutchins compares KUSA/9News's (Tegna) coverage and KDVR's (Nexstar) coverage of a news release from Congresswoman Lauren Boebert, who represents eastern Colorado.

The condensed version: 9News provided context for the news release, correctly reporting that Boebert voted against the projects that she subsequently promoted as benefits to her district; KDVR just regurgitated the news release. 9News also reported that this wasn't the first time that Boebert took credit for projects she voted against.


Hutchins wraps it up:

Fans of Boebert’s might get their hackles up over this, feeling perhaps that 9NEWS is “partisan” for reporting that context, that “commie Clark” is simply carrying water for the libs with such coverage — and they might cheer KDVR for its “unbiased” journalism when it simply regurgitates a press release from a politician they agree with.

Such people likely forget all the times 9NEWS has reported just as critically on Democrats who just so happen to control all of state government and Colorado’s largest municipality. And if they actually do want less critical coverage of Colorado’s politicians in general, which could happen if the Nexstar/Tegna deal goes through, I really don’t know what to say.

(References: Clark is Kyle Clark, 9News lead anchor and something of a bête noire for right-wingers; Colorado's largest municipality is Denver.)

Hutchins published his piece before Trump flipped and indicated that he now favored the merger.
 
A poll says most republicans oppose the Tegna Nexstar merger:


However, the poll was taken before the president changed his view on the merger. And the poll says republicans want TV stations to be locally owned, which is impossible.

83% of respondents said they believe local TV stations should be locally owned. 2% said they would prefer local stations be owned by major corporate ownership. An additional 75% of those surveyed said they opposed large corporate TV groups buying local TV stations.

Sinclair is a conservative republican TV owner, and they don't believe in local TV ownership. Obviously those polled think big media companies are all owned by liberals. I wonder how they reached that conclusion.
 
Obviously those polled think big media companies are all owned by liberals. I wonder how they reached that conclusion.

I presume that was sarcasm, A, because we all know that they reached that conclusion because "someone" (probably with the initials DJT) told them so.

And the station group that I am working with in New Mexico is owned by a native of Albuquerque who is decidedly not a conservative.
 
The result of any merger in Denver has become murkier, due to an abrupt management shake-up at Scripps' Denver7, KMGH. Denver7 would have been positioned to pick up viewers from any weakening of the news product at 9News (KUSA) that, it's speculated, would result from a Tegna-Nexstar merger. Thread in Colorado TV (including crediting the source of this information): https://radiodiscussions.com/threads/abrupt-management-shake-up-at-scripps-denver7.779844/
 


Back
Top Bottom