• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Nexstar ready to hook up with TEGNA?

From FTVLive: CBS has the prestige of being the first TV station in the country. Also, CBS parent company Paramount is looking to pay down a large debt. Don’t be surprised if they would not joyfully sell the station.



Even if Paramount was really serious about selling their TV stations, their President of the TV stations Jennifer Mitchell needs Bari Weiss and David Ellison to make a final decision on that one. Jennifer Mitchell is in the same situation as Tom Cibrowski they are "Presidents" within Paramount but the final desicion and their power are with the Ellisons and Bari Weiss. Also it has to be in the form of a memo where Bari Weiss writes the entire memo and the presidents have to co sign that memo Bari Weiss or David Ellison written themselves.
 

Here is more this time on Nexstar renaming their local stations post Tegna deal.



 
The Colorado Sun nonprofit news website has an in-depth examination of the effects of the Tegna-Nexstar merger on Denver TV news, written by Nicole Vap, a former executive producer at KUSA (9News). KUSA was owned by Tegna; Nexstar owns KDVR and KWGN and has promised to spin off KTVD. At present, effects from the merger have been limited to the additional of a Nexstar tag at the end of newscasts. KUSA's main channel is still carried on a digital subchannel of KTVD to take advantage of UHF's better performance for digital broadcasting.

However, there is considerable concern over what Nexstar might do. Former KUSA and KCNC president and general manager Roger Ogden, a genuine heavyweight in television management, lays it out in this quote from the Colorado Sun article:

-- “There’s never been anything like this before,” said Roger Ogden, who spent most of his career in newsroom and TV management starting at 9News in the 1960s. Ogden served as president and general manager at KCNC CBS4 and later KUSA 9News, as well as serving as president of NBC Europe and CEO of Gannett Broadcasting [Tegna's predecessor]

Ogden says Denver will feel the merger more than most of Nexstar’s markets because of the size of the newsrooms and their editorial impact.

“I don’t think there’ll be two news operations,” he said. “It’ll be combined, and Channel 31
[KDVR, Fox31] and their news director will be calling all the shots.”

The companies have said combining the two operations would allow them to “expand local news coverage, strengthen digital offerings, and increase advertising opportunities.”

But longtime Denver TV insiders like Ogden say this merger comes with a much higher cost to independent reporting in Colorado. Ogden predicts deep cuts will be needed to make the finances of this merger work. He expects to see 80 to 90 journalists laid off in Denver.

To complete the transaction, Nexstar took on $5.1 billion in new debt, adding to fears there will be cuts in the company’s 31 overlapping markets. The final deal has been met with mixed reaction on Wall Street.

(end quote)

There's also been a lot of focus on 9 News' marquee anchor, Kyle Clark, and whether Nexstar would remove him from the station because of criticism he gets from conservatives. There's the perception that Nexstar has a conservative slant, bolstered by Donald Trump's favorable remarks regarding the merger. Clark's signature program is "Next", airing nightly at 6 pm, featuring accountability and commentary from Clark. The program is successful but the perception is that it won't fit in with Nexstar's politics. Another quote from the article:

-- The fact that the show that bears his name is a ratings juggernaut, his sometimes-sarcastic tone when holding politicians and others to account, no matter their political affiliation, along with Clark’s ability to connect with viewers through social media, makes his future of particular interest to Ogden.

“It’s financially by far the most successful show that Channel 9 has now,” Ogden said. Which means Nexstar must decide, he said, “does the money matter most or does the content?”

Clark has given his most honest answers to what happens next for him during his daily viewer feedback segment when he answers comments that come in during the show. “Next” has covered the merger extensively and reported the FCC and DOJ decision within minutes of its announcement March 19.

Clark choked up reading a viewer comment that started with, “I am praying big time for all of you guys at 9News,” from a viewer named Emily. He went on to read the note from Emily, who said 9News has been “a part of my life all of my life.” Hers was a sentiment shared by many others in the community in comments to a post of the segment online.

(end quote)

9News has also been active in fundraising with charitable groups. Those groups are afraid that Nexstar will drop those efforts, some of which have already been discontinued by KUSA.

This is an insightful article, written by someone who understands and has deep experience in broadcast news. Link: Tegna-Nexstar megamerger drama has national implications, but seismic impact on Denver news
 
The Nexstar merger was discussed during this week's regular open FCC meeting in DC:


Carr says there hasn't been a decision to increase ownership limits. For now, they'll issue waivers on a case by case basis.
 

Here is more this time from Governor Newsom in response to the Nexstar Lawsuit the California AG has filed in Downtown Sacramento this is given that the Sacramento TV market is one of many TV markets around the nation affected by the Nexstar/Tegna deal.

Governor Gavin Newsom today blasted President Donald Trump’s federal regulators for approving the proposed Nexstar Media Group and Tegna Inc. merger, lambasting the deal as the latest example of Trump abandoning consumers and allowing corporate power to run unchecked.
Brendan Carr is a disgrace, and this latest ‘deal’ would make Vladimir Putin proud. The Trump Administration is walking away from its responsibility to protect consumers and competitive markets — putting corporate profits ahead of working families. California is stepping up to fill that void… More enforcement to come!

Across industries — from media to live entertainment to telecommunications — the Trump Administration has declined to challenge consolidation, allowing powerful corporations to grow larger while consumers face higher prices, fewer choices, and less accountability. The Nexstar/Tegna merger is the latest example.
“The Trump Administration has made it clear that its allegiance lies with protecting corporate donors, not invigorating our economy, not fueling competition, not protecting workers and American families,” said Attorney General Rob Bonta. “Consolidation in markets at the center of American economic life — like the entertainment or broadcasting industries — doesn’t serve our economy and has proven to lead to increased unaffordability, a loss of good-paying job opportunities, and fewer choices for consumers. The President seems to be more concerned with helping his rich friends get richer rather than helping bring costs down for the American people — this is not consistent with California’s values. We will continue fighting on all fronts.”
 

Here is more this time on Nexstar renaming their local stations post Tegna deal.



In Atlanta 11Alive replaced Tenga with Nextstar at the end of the 6PM newscast. That's the only change so far. I have lost count of the number of ownerships Channel 11 has had since 1976.
 
In Atlanta 11Alive replaced Tenga with Nextstar at the end of the 6PM newscast. That's the only change so far. I have lost count of the number of ownerships Channel 11 has had since 1976.
The operating names have changed but it's actually been a continuous ownership since 1968, which is pretty remarkable. Pacific and Southern became Combined Communications in a merger (1973), and Combined merged into Gannett in 1979. And that's been it until TEGNA (the successor company to Gannett after the Gannett name was spun off along with Gannett's former print newspapers) was bought by Nexstar.
 

In Des Moines before Nexstar took the Tenga channels, WHO 13 has had Newsnation part of their newscasts. They have a Political Minute with the host of The Hill on Newsnation doing the reporting and mostly relies on the Newsnation segments then the NBC News department.

I don't know if it's Nexstars decision or the network itself but when there is breaking news and they interrupt with NBC National coverage that when it's time to air the news they stop the NBC breaking news and they go on with their newscasts. They do say if you want to continue watching the breaking news it's on their website.
 
The operating names have changed but it's actually been a continuous ownership since 1968, which is pretty remarkable. Pacific and Southern became Combined Communications in a merger (1973), and Combined merged into Gannett in 1979. And that's been it until TEGNA (the successor company to Gannett after the Gannett name was spun off along with Gannett's former print newspapers) was bought by Nexstar.
Wasn't 11 at one time a part of WQXI which I believe was owned Jefferson Pilot insurance company that was bought by Lincoln.

I remember reading in the AJC the folks at Combined really did well financially when Gannett took over.
 
A California judge has just issued a Temporary Restraining Order in the DirecTV lawsuit requiring Nexstar to continue operating TEGNA as a separate company while the lawsuit plays out. Nexstar has until April 1 to file it's opposition to the TRO which a hearing April 7. Nexstar may also appeal the order.
 
A California judge has just issued a Temporary Restraining Order in the DirecTV lawsuit requiring Nexstar to continue operating TEGNA as a separate company while the lawsuit plays out. Nexstar has until April 1 to file it's opposition to the TRO which a hearing April 7. Nexstar may also appeal the order.
The danger in killing the merger would be the TEGNA stations being sold off to an owner that is even worse, or is undercapitalized. The TEGNA stations could also be sold off piecemeal, but who would be the buyers? And who is interested in a dying media segment?

In some markets the merger isn’t affecting overall news output, such as in DFW and Houston.
 
The danger in killing the merger would be the TEGNA stations being sold off to an owner that is even worse, or is undercapitalized. The TEGNA stations could also be sold off piecemeal, but who would be the buyers? And who is interested in a dying media segment?

In some markets the merger isn’t affecting overall news output, such as in DFW and Houston.
And in some it's going to have a big impact.

The rush by Nexstar and Tegna to close the deal even after the lawsuit to block it had been filed is something that a judge is not likely to view favorably.
 

Well there’s a suggestion that you can boycott Nexstar by ending your cable service. But that depends where you are located. If you are in Boston, Detroit, Miami, and Orlando its easy to not support Nexstar because they don't exist in those TV Markets. But that is a rare case, for everybody else its cutting your expenses with cable thats at play here to make boycotting Nexstar viable.
 
Last edited:
The billions of taxpayer money lost by the government in California and this AG worried about tv station consolidation.
This is an entirely irrelevant comment, political in nature, unanchored in any facts, and devoid of any media content. The only reason I didn't report it is that it had been quoted in another post, so reporting it is pointless.

A crime is a crime, regardless of where it happens.
Actually, I believe antitrust violations are civil offenses rather than criminal. But, yes, as long as the AGs can show standing, they are perfectly within their rights to bring a case.
 


Back
Top Bottom