• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

No more Muzak?

http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1473593.html

If you look at this story, it looks as if the familiar "Muzak" format is gone. The company still distributes lots of music styles, including a traditional instrumentals format (which they don't tell anyone about). If you go to their web site, it appears the "Environment" format, the one everyone hates except us, the one people are referring to when they say "Muzak", is no longer listed.
 
vchimpanzee said:
http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1473593.html

If you look at this story, it looks as if the familiar "Muzak" format is gone. The company still distributes lots of music styles, including a traditional instrumentals format (which they don't tell anyone about). If you go to their web site, it appears the "Environment" format, the one everyone hates except us, the one people are referring to when they say "Muzak", is no longer listed.

Sad. I love Muzak, New Age, Smooth Jazz, etc. Look it what's happening to some smooth jazz outlets across the country. :(
 
Sadder still is the tone of the News Observer piece. It's easy to heap scorn on Muzak-style music but unfair to do so.

There used to be a competing in-store music service by Westinghouse and a good friend of mine was one of the arranger/conductors of the "Westinghouse Orchestra" (just a rotating collection of studio musicians, really). But he worked very hard on the arrangements and the musicians gave totally professional performances.

True, the music was designed to serve as non-intrusive background but that doesn't mean that those who created it were unprofessional or uncaring about the end results. Much of it even stands up well in critical listening.

C5
 
As a former music director / Jock that was allowed to program the music on a few radio stations or at least on my shift I have been told I have a knack for knowing what music fits together. Not that this kind of talent is worth anything in the outside world! So I tried to get a job at Muzak but I never could get into the "music architect " department. I did manage to get an interview in the operations department. In the interview I learned some interesting things.

First of all the department manager I interviewed with was humorless. He looked like someone who would not tolerate any screw ups and he stressed it was a precision operation. The commercials (for the clients that have them) get switched into the music at specific times, the music is all on CD. I was told the RIAA will not let them put music files on a server. Muzak uses CD changers which tend to have mechanical problems and that's where the operations department comes in. Some of the work is on computer systems which I could do. This manager told me people in his department were always trying to transfer into the IT department. I asked the typical question, "What do you like about your job". Now usually you get the answer, oh the people are great here, the work is varied, etc etc. His answer was he liked the autonomy he had.

I think what kept me from getting the job was money, I wanted too much. Just as well because from my research Muzak hasn't made a profit in 11 years, they used expert consultants who were supposed to make them profitable and didn't. The chapter 11 thing was just the icing on the cake. I liked the music I heard around the offices, very hip, lively, but not necessarily modern, more like what you might hear at a really cool Jazz nightclub.

So much for Muzak as a place of employment.
 
From my experience and listening* the "Environmental" programme today, more or less, *is* still the traditional, stereotypical "Muzak" "elevator music" format. If you listen to some of the old Stimulus Progression Demo LPs (yes, Muzak used to distribute "demonstration records" to prospective users years ago) and particularly the records from the early-mid-80s, there is quite a noticeable "evolution" of sorts from the older, Lawrence Welk-ish styled music of years past to the more "smooth jazz-ish" style there is now.

The whole "Stimulus Progression" thing stopped sometime in the 1990s and since then, Environmental has been programmed pretty much like the rest of the company's offerings. Why StimProg was dropped, I have never really been able to find out. Must be anyone's guess.

But "Muzak" (in terms of the music itself, not the company) has always been Muzak. It's just changed with the times and people's tastes. Besides, I am having a lot of trouble trying to imagine Muzak not carrying Muzak........ ;o)

Edit add, attn. vchimpanzee:
Open a new Firefox tab (or window in my case; I can't stand "tab browsing") and enter this URL into your address field:
http://music.muzak.com/music/programs/genre/6/instrumentals/
Scroll down a little bit and look between "Ensemble" and "Intermezzo". ;o)


_____________________________________________________________
* I used to listen to Environmental via Echostar 7 quite religiously on my Pansat, even recorded several hours of it on CDs and a computer I no longer have, before they started Nagravisioning it about a year and a half ago. Definitely helped me get through 2006 and the first half of 2007 with better morale than anyone else involved.........
 
vchimpanzee said:
http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1473593.html

If you look at this story, it looks as if the familiar "Muzak" format is gone. The company still distributes lots of music styles, including a traditional instrumentals format (which they don't tell anyone about). If you go to their web site, it appears the "Environment" format, the one everyone hates except us, the one people are referring to when they say "Muzak", is no longer listed.

I'm curious....do they still use SCA to broadcast or are they 100% satellite?
 
Darth_vader said:
Edit add, attn. vchimpanzee:
Open a new Firefox tab (or window in my case; I can't stand "tab browsing") and enter this URL into your address field:
http://music.muzak.com/music/programs/genre/6/instrumentals/
Scroll down a little bit and look between "Ensemble" and "Intermezzo". ;o)


_____________________________________________________________
* I used to listen to Environmental via Echostar 7 quite religiously on my Pansat, even recorded several hours of it on CDs and a computer I no longer have, before they started Nagravisioning it about a year and a half ago. Definitely helped me get through 2006 and the first half of 2007 with better morale than anyone else involved.........
I go to a library that has Firefox and I hate it.
 
"I'm curious....do they still use SCA to broadcast or are they 100% satellite?"

Pretty much all satellite and disc, as I understand.

There may still be a few areas with SCA stations carrying Muzak. Seattle and New York spring to my mind right off hand. Bruce Elving (FM Atlas) told me that Minneapoils/St. paul had a Muzak SCA broadcast but it was shut down in 2007, if I remember right. (Dr. Elving's in Esko, MN but says he could get the Twin Cities Muzak channels frequently.) I haven't been to Seattle in several years so I can't tell you if that one's still on the air or not. It was when I was there in 2001. If there even are any Muzak SCA feeds still broadcasting, they are an endangered species if they aren't already extinct.

I think it's pretty much all satellite (DVB via Echostars 3/7 and proprietary (read: non-standard) Encompass LE signal via Galaxy) and encrypted MPEG 1 disc now. There's also an Ethernet-based system of some type, but I really don't know anything about it beyond that......
 
microbopeep said:
vchimpanzee said:
http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1473593.html

If you look at this story, it looks as if the familiar "Muzak" format is gone. The company still distributes lots of music styles, including a traditional instrumentals format (which they don't tell anyone about). If you go to their web site, it appears the "Environment" format, the one everyone hates except us, the one people are referring to when they say "Muzak", is no longer listed.

Sad. I love Muzak, New Age, Smooth Jazz, etc. Look it what's happening to some smooth jazz outlets across the country. :(

go to live365 to see it
 
There are way too many Muzak formats and channels to have it on one SCA so they use the Dish Network units. I played with a Muzak receiver once and it seems like you could pick from lots of musical styles.
 
MUCH of the '50s/'60s/early '70s no-name, outsourced (i.e. foreign originated) B/EZ orchestral output has pretty much fallen into public domain. Until the Megaupload bust a few weeks ago, it was not uncommon find music blogs from die-hard B/EZ fans with hundreds of these old recordings (And like I said, these recordings themselves had for the most part fallen into public domain. They were pretty much collateral damage for the handful of actually copyrighted and CURRENT commercial pop music on Megaupload.)
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom