louisNatl said:
Well you're among company.
I have not seen any TV stations identify their call letters except for Omni and a few independent stations. Most TV affiliates seem to append the network with the city such as Global Edmonton or CTV Channel 9 Vancouver.
That's largely because most of the stations are network O&Os now, and the networks are of course more concerned with having a consistent corporate identity across the board (to an even greater extent than the American nets). CTV's O&Os finally eliminated their calls from their local newscast branding around 2004-2005. I remember reading that CTV wanted to do away from local calls even long before that (around 1997-98), but found from surveys that local calls still resonated more with viewers than the network branding, so they decided to slowly phase out the local branding instead.
Even back when stations branded with their calls, it still wasn't that common for them to do American-style legal IDs due to slack enforcement of the legal ID rules here. That said, it didn't stop Toronto's CFTO from showing a proper legal ID before their local newscasts 20 years ago:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGwUPZmbtyI
As for the OMNI stations... I'm not sure when the original OMNI station, Toronto's CFMT, started identifying as "CFMT London Ottawa Toronto" (and I never quite understood why they didn't put "Toronto" first), but they kept it even after their parent company Rogers rebranded them to "OMNI.1", and the practice of doing (quasi-)legal IDs have since spread to the other OMNI stations as well. CHNM in Vancouver never did legal IDs until Rogers bought it and rebranded it OMNI.
Also, what's up with TV stations using the cable channel numbers to identify themselves? CTV in Vancouver broadcasts over the air on channel 32 but labels themselves as channel 9 since that is their position on cable.
That is quite comparable with the situation in San Diego, Palm Springs and Fort Myers. Cable subscription rates are high in most Canadian markets, to the point that most people have no idea what the station's actual over-the-air channel numbers are. At least that's the case with everyone I know in Vancouver; they actually refer to CHAN-TV (VHF 8 ) as "channel 11", and CKVU (VHF 10) as "channel 13".
As for CTV Vancouver (CIVT)... they were actually a latecomer to the local TV scene, having signed on air in 1997 as an independent station (back then the CTV affiliation was still on CHAN-TV, which identified on-air as "BCTV"). By that time, it's pretty much already been established that an overwhelming majority of people in Vancouver subscribe to cable, and cable channel numbers really are more relevant to most people than OTA channel numbers, so there was no point for CIVT to mention "32" at all; they were more or less just "going with the flow".
True, they probably lost some potential viewers who don't subscribe to cable and don't know where to find them, but that number was in all likelihood too small for them to bother with having a dual cable/OTA branding (a la NBC 7/39). And throughout the station's existence, the "cable 9" position has always played more of a second fiddle to its branding anyway; the station went by "VTV" during its independent years (1997-2001) before becoming a CTV O&O following the
great switcheroo of 2001.
Incidentally, the one and only time I personally heard CIVT mention both their callsign and OTA channel number on air was the morning of the affiliation switch, during their sign-on announcement. "Good morning, this is CIVT Vancouver, channel 32, cable 9."
And I just wanted to throw this in: CFCN in Calgary (VHF 4) had long been on cable 5, and identified as "Channel 5" on-air along with a numeral 5 logo. They later moved down to cable 3, and instead of getting a completely new "3" logo, they simply modified the "5" by moving the position of one stroke, resulting in a rather ugly-looking "3" (at least in my opinion).
By the way, these are not complaints. I love my new home in Canada!
Always good to hear. Welcome aboard!
