• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

"Nobody Listens to the Radio Anymore"

C

classicradionut

Guest
According to a store electronics clerk at Circuit City, anyway.

-- By Steve West

Gang, I went shopping last weekend and one of the places I went was
the aforementioned store. Here's the setup: I'm looking through
the electronics section at the numerous home theatre receiver
systems, hoping to find a standalone AM/FM receiver like you could
get in the 70s & 80s. When I ask the clerk what the specs on the FM
receivers are (5 gangs of RF stages, 4 IF filters), the clerk says
to me, "Well, I can't get you specs like that... I can tell you how
many watts, etc., or I can look them up online in our cataloge.....
But, nobody listens to the radio anymore anyway, that's why we don't
carry just radio receivers".

So, incredulous that this 20-something year old manager actually
SAID something we've all heard but didn't believe, I go on the
explain to him that he's talking to a 25-year broadcaster. We
talked for at least 20 minutes, and among other things, I asked him
why he said that. His answer? "Well think about it. I DON'T
listen to the radio. None of the kids that comes in here listens to
the radio. My brothers and sisters don't listen to the radio". So,
naturally, my next question is, "So how do you know what to buy for
music?" "Online", he replies. "Do you know about Bit Torrent? Well, that, MTV, and I have XM Satellite radio." At about this time I'm thinking to myself that this manager is way too young to know what's going on... but on second thought he's closer to the demographic than any of US, working in a store that sells electronic gadgets.


RANT FOLLOWS--

Radio today just keeps going on as if it's business as usual. For
those of you still IN radio - your GM or OM is still thinking inside
the box, as if that station is going to be there in some form for
years to come. They keep accepting those ads from XM for broadcast
(thats kinda like the crosstown station advertising on yours), they
keep cutting the airstaff and increasing voicetracking and
automation, thinking that by lowering the bottom line and creating
more profits for investors that the money will always be there.

Meanwhile, the programming gets more bland and amateurish every
day. The magic that brought in new listeners and held longtime ones
is gone at most places, replaced by a satellite feed and local
liners. The music is safe. Everywhere, safelists abound by young
consultants who say it's best to play it safe and never take the
chance some P1 listener will change the station because they don't
like a particular song. Um... hello. The P1's are leaving anyway
because there's nothing interesting on the air.

Why do the corporate suits not get it? Whether it's me or some
retired radio legend trying to tell them, they don't listen when we
say that the product is too watered down, is run by Wall Street
investors and the music industry with it's payola tactics, and the
audience caboose is that 35 year old who remembers FM's CHR wars in
the 80s - and even they are leaving.

Why, may I ask, is it that CHRs can't make a dent in the ratings in
most markets? The young audience isn't listening to radio, they're
downloading their songs to their I-PODS. Oops, there's that dirty
word. And, it's not just the young audience that's disappeared.
Radio AND it's advertisers have shot themselves in the foot by
ignoring the 55+ demo. Things like the brilliant format change at
WCBS-FM New York show just how far to the right the stupidity meter
is pegged. Somebody say Jack?

Admittedly, much of this is not necessarilly the fault of radio,
with so many new technologies out there, listeners are very much
distracted away from radio. But, the one tool stations have at
their disposal, the one weapon they have in attracting and keeping
an audience is having a LIVE, LOCAL presence that is involved in the
community. And, it's the ONE thing that most stations are speeding
away from at light speed in this nit-witted effort to lower
operating costs. The line of thinking at most stations these days could be summed up this way: Here's what the GM or his national brand manager is probably thinking: "That's right, fire the DJs, in fact, fire the
Newsperson and Public Affairs person and make the one morning jock
do their jobs along with his. It works in a factory, so why not in
radio, make people do more for less. In fact, why do we need an
airstaff at all? I'll just have my production guy work to fit
everything in during the week, after all he's on salary so he can
live at the station. I'l farm out the liners to a cyber jock."

Now, have you heard the station lately?

Forget entertainment and attracting an audience, you now have a
station that simply BORES the audience to death. The guy you have
doing morning news can barely get through a newscast without
stumbling over half his sentences. And you wonder why nobody's
listening?

Can anyone remember the great old days of AM Top 40? I literally
remember striking up a conversation with friends about what the DJ
did the previous night on WKBW Buffalo - a station about 500 miles
away we got on DX at night. Yea, my FRIENDS even listened! Not
because it was DX, but because it was great radio!! Would we have
listened if we had the internet? Probably not as much but
definitely yes!

You who run radio stations had better pull your head out of your ass
cheeks. Better find a way to attract the young audience, but fast,
because if you don't there really WILL be no listeners left. Your
main audience is probably 38-60 instead of any numbers the so-called
professional bean counters have quoted you. And, as soon as the
advertisers wake up to the fact that nobody's listening to the
radio, your precious revenue stream will dry up. Then what do you
do?

GET LOCAL. It is the ONLY way you will attract an audience. That,
and let your DJs be DJs again. Throw away the liners and cue
cards. Open your playlists. Expand the horizons, and do what XM,
Sirius and MTV can't - talk to and entertain your local audience.

Before it's too late.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
 
With all due respect... everything in the rant reads like a cut-and-paste job from a thousand other radio rants.

> GET LOCAL. It is the ONLY way you will attract an audience. That,
> and let your DJs be DJs again. Throw away the liners and cue
> cards. Open your playlists. Expand the horizons, and do what XM,
> Sirius and MTV can't - talk to and entertain your local audience.

This is the standard demand from traditionalists. Why doesn't anyone demand that television become local? All that network crap they air! Let's call the local theater and televise them. That would sure beat the hell out of watching the latest episode of 24 wouldn't it? Well, wouldn't it!?




<P ID="signature">______________
"On average, drug prisoners spend more time in federal prison than rapists, who often get out on early release because of the overcrowding in prison caused by the Drug War."-Michael Badnarik</P>
 
> With all due respect... everything in the rant reads like a
> cut-and-paste job from a thousand other radio rants.

Which (as usual) ignores that satellite radio has a total of 3% of nationwide listening.

I guess Mr. Circuit City thinks 97% = "nobody".<P ID="signature">______________


</P>
 
> Which (as usual) ignores that satellite radio has a total of
> 3% of nationwide listening.
>
> I guess Mr. Circuit City thinks 97% = "nobody".

You know, I'm a big critic of Arbitron's Diary Methodology but..... I've noticed that a lot of advertisers will dismiss it as being inadequate, but then rely on a survey of friends and family instead! Oh, now THAT'S scientific!<P ID="signature">______________
"On average, drug prisoners spend more time in federal prison than rapists, who often get out on early release because of the overcrowding in prison caused by the Drug War."-Michael Badnarik</P>
 
Putting a bunch of DJs on the air and letting them spew forth isn't going to attract an audience away from their iPods, if they're the kind of folks who could never be happy with anything but their own personal playlist. A statistic I've seen is that heavy iPod users listen to about 15 minutes less radio per week. That is not "abandoning radio in droves and oh my god we'd better ressurect Robert W. Morgan from his grave or radio will die a horrible death!". (Even if we could develop a jock in the style of the past, that doesn't mean the kids would listen).

By the way, growing up I listened to CKLW and I didn't live anywhere near Detroit..in fact I lived in a cornfield about 175 miles to the southwest. We might as well have been listening to a satellite feed (if it had existed) from KHJ. Heck, even the weather forecast wasn't right for our area..our 90 degrees would be 80 at the Big 8, and there might even be five inches of snow there with rain where I lived. WLS and WABC certainly weren't local. The big powerhouses like WLS regularly walloped local top 40 stations in places like Champaign, IL and Lafayette, IN. (I can also remember lots of folks in my school who were very happy with TM Stereo Rock off automation reels.

Yes, I miss the radio of the past, but I note that what I listened to wasn't "local" as far as I was concerned.<P ID="signature">______________
Have a Happy New Year!
http://www.thebig8.net/have_a_happy_new_year_with_cklw.mp3</P>
 
> A statistic I've seen is that heavy iPod users listen to about 15 minutes less > radio per week. That is not "abandoning radio in droves

I agree. I have an iPod myself! You know what it displaces? Mostly satellite radio! When I'm travelling, instead of paying XM or Sirius or trying to pick up local stations from the freeway, I just record my favorites, pop it into the iPod and off I go.

> By the way, growing up I listened to CKLW and I didn't live anywhere near
> Detroit..in fact I lived in a cornfield about 175 miles to the southwest.

Good point! I was a long-distance CKLW listener myself. I guess we didn't get the memo that we would only listen to local radio. For me, the fact that it was far away was part of the appeal. I guess that explains my current enjoyment of foreign radio stations via the Internet.<P ID="signature">______________
"On average, drug prisoners spend more time in federal prison than rapists, who often get out on early release because of the overcrowding in prison caused by the Drug War."-Michael Badnarik</P>
 
> > With all due respect... everything in the rant reads like
> a
> > cut-and-paste job from a thousand other radio rants.
>
> Which (as usual) ignores that satellite radio has a total of
> 3% of nationwide listening.

Actually, you misplaced the decimal point. It is 0.3 percent!
>
> I guess Mr. Circuit City thinks 97% = "nobody".

He is one of the few percent of people who do not listen to radio. As I have said too many times, over 93% of Americans listen to radio weekly, off less than 2% since 1965.
>
 
> (I
> can also remember lots of folks in my school who were very
> happy with TM Stereo Rock off automation reels.



Agreed. People tend to forget that automation has been around for a long time. I guess it is selective memorey. We remember things the way we want to remember them and not nessisarily the way they were. >
>
 
> According to a store electronics clerk at Circuit City,
> anyway.
>
> -- By Steve West
>
> Gang, I went shopping last weekend and one of the places I
> went was
> the aforementioned store. Here's the setup: I'm looking
> through
> the electronics section at the numerous home theatre
> receiver
> systems, hoping to find a standalone AM/FM receiver like you
> could
> get in the 70s & 80s. When I ask the clerk what the specs
> on the FM
> receivers are (5 gangs of RF stages, 4 IF filters), the
> clerk says
> to me, "Well, I can't get you specs like that... I can tell
> you how
> many watts, etc., or I can look them up online in our
> cataloge.....
> But, nobody listens to the radio anymore anyway, that's why
> we don't
> carry just radio receivers".
>
> So, incredulous that this 20-something year old manager
> actually
> SAID something we've all heard but didn't believe, I go on
> the
> explain to him that he's talking to a 25-year broadcaster.
> We
> talked for at least 20 minutes, and among other things, I
> asked him
> why he said that. His answer? "Well think about it. I
> DON'T
> listen to the radio. None of the kids that comes in here
> listens to
> the radio. My brothers and sisters don't listen to the
> radio". So,
> naturally, my next question is, "So how do you know what to
> buy for
> music?" "Online", he replies. "Do you know about Bit
> Torrent? Well, that, MTV, and I have XM Satellite radio."
> At about this time I'm thinking to myself that this manager
> is way too young to know what's going on... but on second
> thought he's closer to the demographic than any of US,
> working in a store that sells electronic gadgets.
>
>
> RANT FOLLOWS--
>
> Radio today just keeps going on as if it's business as
> usual. For
> those of you still IN radio - your GM or OM is still
> thinking inside
> the box, as if that station is going to be there in some
> form for
> years to come. They keep accepting those ads from XM for
> broadcast
> (thats kinda like the crosstown station advertising on
> yours), they
> keep cutting the airstaff and increasing voicetracking and
> automation, thinking that by lowering the bottom line and
> creating
> more profits for investors that the money will always be
> there.
>
> Meanwhile, the programming gets more bland and amateurish
> every
> day. The magic that brought in new listeners and held
> longtime ones
> is gone at most places, replaced by a satellite feed and
> local
> liners. The music is safe. Everywhere, safelists abound by
> young
> consultants who say it's best to play it safe and never take
> the
> chance some P1 listener will change the station because they
> don't
> like a particular song. Um... hello. The P1's are leaving
> anyway
> because there's nothing interesting on the air.
>
> Why do the corporate suits not get it? Whether it's me or
> some
> retired radio legend trying to tell them, they don't listen
> when we
> say that the product is too watered down, is run by Wall
> Street
> investors and the music industry with it's payola tactics,
> and the
> audience caboose is that 35 year old who remembers FM's CHR
> wars in
> the 80s - and even they are leaving.
>
> Why, may I ask, is it that CHRs can't make a dent in the
> ratings in
> most markets? The young audience isn't listening to radio,
> they're
> downloading their songs to their I-PODS. Oops, there's that
> dirty
> word. And, it's not just the young audience that's
> disappeared.
> Radio AND it's advertisers have shot themselves in the foot
> by
> ignoring the 55+ demo. Things like the brilliant format
> change at
> WCBS-FM New York show just how far to the right the
> stupidity meter
> is pegged. Somebody say Jack?
>
> Admittedly, much of this is not necessarilly the fault of
> radio,
> with so many new technologies out there, listeners are very
> much
> distracted away from radio. But, the one tool stations have
> at
> their disposal, the one weapon they have in attracting and
> keeping
> an audience is having a LIVE, LOCAL presence that is
> involved in the
> community. And, it's the ONE thing that most stations are
> speeding
> away from at light speed in this nit-witted effort to lower
>
> operating costs. The line of thinking at most stations
> these days could be summed up this way: Here's what the GM
> or his national brand manager is probably thinking: "That's
> right, fire the DJs, in fact, fire the
> Newsperson and Public Affairs person and make the one
> morning jock
> do their jobs along with his. It works in a factory, so why
> not in
> radio, make people do more for less. In fact, why do we
> need an
> airstaff at all? I'll just have my production guy work to
> fit
> everything in during the week, after all he's on salary so
> he can
> live at the station. I'l farm out the liners to a cyber
> jock."
>
> Now, have you heard the station lately?
>
> Forget entertainment and attracting an audience, you now
> have a
> station that simply BORES the audience to death. The guy
> you have
> doing morning news can barely get through a newscast without
>
> stumbling over half his sentences. And you wonder why
> nobody's
> listening?
>
> Can anyone remember the great old days of AM Top 40? I
> literally
> remember striking up a conversation with friends about what
> the DJ
> did the previous night on WKBW Buffalo - a station about 500
> miles
> away we got on DX at night. Yea, my FRIENDS even listened!
> Not
> because it was DX, but because it was great radio!! Would
> we have
> listened if we had the internet? Probably not as much but
> definitely yes!
>
> You who run radio stations had better pull your head out of
> your ass
> cheeks. Better find a way to attract the young audience,
> but fast,
> because if you don't there really WILL be no listeners left.
> Your
> main audience is probably 38-60 instead of any numbers the
> so-called
> professional bean counters have quoted you. And, as soon as
> the
> advertisers wake up to the fact that nobody's listening to
> the
> radio, your precious revenue stream will dry up. Then what
> do you
> do?
>
> GET LOCAL. It is the ONLY way you will attract an audience.
> That,
> and let your DJs be DJs again. Throw away the liners and
> cue
> cards. Open your playlists. Expand the horizons, and do
> what XM,
> Sirius and MTV can't - talk to and entertain your local
> audience.
>
> Before it's too late.
>

Two words for you, Steve. Well said.
 
Or even U.S. stations via Live 365.

> Good point! I was a long-distance CKLW listener myself. I
> guess we didn't get the memo that we would only listen to
> local radio. For me, the fact that it was far away was part
> of the appeal. I guess that explains my current enjoyment of
> foreign radio stations via the Internet.
>
 
The key words were "20-something year old". This age groups tend to listen to less radio, until they are older when they dont have the time to deal with iPods, MP3 players ya da ya da. Then they have to deal with responsibilities like JOBS (real ones), kids etc. He is just relating to what he knows in his age group.

In reagrds to radios being in stores, I have no idea what you are talking about. They are everywhere. Am I missing something?

> According to a store electronics clerk at Circuit City,
> anyway.
>
> -- By Steve West
>
> Gang, I went shopping last weekend and one of the places I
> went was
> the aforementioned store. Here's the setup: I'm looking
> through
> the electronics section at the numerous home theatre
> receiver
> systems, hoping to find a standalone AM/FM receiver like you
> could
> get in the 70s & 80s. When I ask the clerk what the specs
> on the FM
> receivers are (5 gangs of RF stages, 4 IF filters), the
> clerk says
> to me, "Well, I can't get you specs like that... I can tell
> you how
> many watts, etc., or I can look them up online in our
> cataloge.....
> But, nobody listens to the radio anymore anyway, that's why
> we don't
> carry just radio receivers".
>
> So, incredulous that this 20-something year old manager
> actually
> SAID something we've all heard but didn't believe, I go on
> the
> explain to him that he's talking to a 25-year broadcaster.
> We
> talked for at least 20 minutes, and among other things, I
> asked him
> why he said that. His answer? "Well think about it. I
> DON'T
> listen to the radio. None of the kids that comes in here
> listens to
> the radio. My brothers and sisters don't listen to the
> radio". So,
> naturally, my next question is, "So how do you know what to
> buy for
> music?" "Online", he replies. "Do you know about Bit
> Torrent? Well, that, MTV, and I have XM Satellite radio."
> At about this time I'm thinking to myself that this manager
> is way too young to know what's going on... but on second
> thought he's closer to the demographic than any of US,
> working in a store that sells electronic gadgets.
>
>
> RANT FOLLOWS--
>
> Radio today just keeps going on as if it's business as
> usual. For
> those of you still IN radio - your GM or OM is still
> thinking inside
> the box, as if that station is going to be there in some
> form for
> years to come. They keep accepting those ads from XM for
> broadcast
> (thats kinda like the crosstown station advertising on
> yours), they
> keep cutting the airstaff and increasing voicetracking and
> automation, thinking that by lowering the bottom line and
> creating
> more profits for investors that the money will always be
> there.
>
> Meanwhile, the programming gets more bland and amateurish
> every
> day. The magic that brought in new listeners and held
> longtime ones
> is gone at most places, replaced by a satellite feed and
> local
> liners. The music is safe. Everywhere, safelists abound by
> young
> consultants who say it's best to play it safe and never take
> the
> chance some P1 listener will change the station because they
> don't
> like a particular song. Um... hello. The P1's are leaving
> anyway
> because there's nothing interesting on the air.
>
> Why do the corporate suits not get it? Whether it's me or
> some
> retired radio legend trying to tell them, they don't listen
> when we
> say that the product is too watered down, is run by Wall
> Street
> investors and the music industry with it's payola tactics,
> and the
> audience caboose is that 35 year old who remembers FM's CHR
> wars in
> the 80s - and even they are leaving.
>
> Why, may I ask, is it that CHRs can't make a dent in the
> ratings in
> most markets? The young audience isn't listening to radio,
> they're
> downloading their songs to their I-PODS. Oops, there's that
> dirty
> word. And, it's not just the young audience that's
> disappeared.
> Radio AND it's advertisers have shot themselves in the foot
> by
> ignoring the 55+ demo. Things like the brilliant format
> change at
> WCBS-FM New York show just how far to the right the
> stupidity meter
> is pegged. Somebody say Jack?
>
> Admittedly, much of this is not necessarilly the fault of
> radio,
> with so many new technologies out there, listeners are very
> much
> distracted away from radio. But, the one tool stations have
> at
> their disposal, the one weapon they have in attracting and
> keeping
> an audience is having a LIVE, LOCAL presence that is
> involved in the
> community. And, it's the ONE thing that most stations are
> speeding
> away from at light speed in this nit-witted effort to lower
>
> operating costs. The line of thinking at most stations
> these days could be summed up this way: Here's what the GM
> or his national brand manager is probably thinking: "That's
> right, fire the DJs, in fact, fire the
> Newsperson and Public Affairs person and make the one
> morning jock
> do their jobs along with his. It works in a factory, so why
> not in
> radio, make people do more for less. In fact, why do we
> need an
> airstaff at all? I'll just have my production guy work to
> fit
> everything in during the week, after all he's on salary so
> he can
> live at the station. I'l farm out the liners to a cyber
> jock."
>
> Now, have you heard the station lately?
>
> Forget entertainment and attracting an audience, you now
> have a
> station that simply BORES the audience to death. The guy
> you have
> doing morning news can barely get through a newscast without
>
> stumbling over half his sentences. And you wonder why
> nobody's
> listening?
>
> Can anyone remember the great old days of AM Top 40? I
> literally
> remember striking up a conversation with friends about what
> the DJ
> did the previous night on WKBW Buffalo - a station about 500
> miles
> away we got on DX at night. Yea, my FRIENDS even listened!
> Not
> because it was DX, but because it was great radio!! Would
> we have
> listened if we had the internet? Probably not as much but
> definitely yes!
>
> You who run radio stations had better pull your head out of
> your ass
> cheeks. Better find a way to attract the young audience,
> but fast,
> because if you don't there really WILL be no listeners left.
> Your
> main audience is probably 38-60 instead of any numbers the
> so-called
> professional bean counters have quoted you. And, as soon as
> the
> advertisers wake up to the fact that nobody's listening to
> the
> radio, your precious revenue stream will dry up. Then what
> do you
> do?
>
> GET LOCAL. It is the ONLY way you will attract an audience.
> That,
> and let your DJs be DJs again. Throw away the liners and
> cue
> cards. Open your playlists. Expand the horizons, and do
> what XM,
> Sirius and MTV can't - talk to and entertain your local
> audience.
>
> Before it's too late.
>
 
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.asp?feed=AP&Date=20060119&ID=5430456





> According to a store electronics clerk at Circuit City,
> anyway.
>
> -- By Steve West
>
> Gang, I went shopping last weekend and one of the places I
> went was
> the aforementioned store. Here's the setup: I'm looking
> through
> the electronics section at the numerous home theatre
> receiver
> systems, hoping to find a standalone AM/FM receiver like you
> could
> get in the 70s & 80s. When I ask the clerk what the specs
> on the FM
> receivers are (5 gangs of RF stages, 4 IF filters), the
> clerk says
> to me, "Well, I can't get you specs like that... I can tell
> you how
> many watts, etc., or I can look them up online in our
> cataloge.....
> But, nobody listens to the radio anymore anyway, that's why
> we don't
> carry just radio receivers".
>
> So, incredulous that this 20-something year old manager
> actually
> SAID something we've all heard but didn't believe, I go on
> the
> explain to him that he's talking to a 25-year broadcaster.
> We
> talked for at least 20 minutes, and among other things, I
> asked him
> why he said that. His answer? "Well think about it. I
> DON'T
> listen to the radio. None of the kids that comes in here
> listens to
> the radio. My brothers and sisters don't listen to the
> radio". So,
> naturally, my next question is, "So how do you know what to
> buy for
> music?" "Online", he replies. "Do you know about Bit
> Torrent? Well, that, MTV, and I have XM Satellite radio."
> At about this time I'm thinking to myself that this manager
> is way too young to know what's going on... but on second
> thought he's closer to the demographic than any of US,
> working in a store that sells electronic gadgets.
>
>
> RANT FOLLOWS--
>
> Radio today just keeps going on as if it's business as
> usual. For
> those of you still IN radio - your GM or OM is still
> thinking inside
> the box, as if that station is going to be there in some
> form for
> years to come. They keep accepting those ads from XM for
> broadcast
> (thats kinda like the crosstown station advertising on
> yours), they
> keep cutting the airstaff and increasing voicetracking and
> automation, thinking that by lowering the bottom line and
> creating
> more profits for investors that the money will always be
> there.
>
> Meanwhile, the programming gets more bland and amateurish
> every
> day. The magic that brought in new listeners and held
> longtime ones
> is gone at most places, replaced by a satellite feed and
> local
> liners. The music is safe. Everywhere, safelists abound by
> young
> consultants who say it's best to play it safe and never take
> the
> chance some P1 listener will change the station because they
> don't
> like a particular song. Um... hello. The P1's are leaving
> anyway
> because there's nothing interesting on the air.
>
> Why do the corporate suits not get it? Whether it's me or
> some
> retired radio legend trying to tell them, they don't listen
> when we
> say that the product is too watered down, is run by Wall
> Street
> investors and the music industry with it's payola tactics,
> and the
> audience caboose is that 35 year old who remembers FM's CHR
> wars in
> the 80s - and even they are leaving.
>
> Why, may I ask, is it that CHRs can't make a dent in the
> ratings in
> most markets? The young audience isn't listening to radio,
> they're
> downloading their songs to their I-PODS. Oops, there's that
> dirty
> word. And, it's not just the young audience that's
> disappeared.
> Radio AND it's advertisers have shot themselves in the foot
> by
> ignoring the 55+ demo. Things like the brilliant format
> change at
> WCBS-FM New York show just how far to the right the
> stupidity meter
> is pegged. Somebody say Jack?
>
> Admittedly, much of this is not necessarilly the fault of
> radio,
> with so many new technologies out there, listeners are very
> much
> distracted away from radio. But, the one tool stations have
> at
> their disposal, the one weapon they have in attracting and
> keeping
> an audience is having a LIVE, LOCAL presence that is
> involved in the
> community. And, it's the ONE thing that most stations are
> speeding
> away from at light speed in this nit-witted effort to lower
>
> operating costs. The line of thinking at most stations
> these days could be summed up this way: Here's what the GM
> or his national brand manager is probably thinking: "That's
> right, fire the DJs, in fact, fire the
> Newsperson and Public Affairs person and make the one
> morning jock
> do their jobs along with his. It works in a factory, so why
> not in
> radio, make people do more for less. In fact, why do we
> need an
> airstaff at all? I'll just have my production guy work to
> fit
> everything in during the week, after all he's on salary so
> he can
> live at the station. I'l farm out the liners to a cyber
> jock."
>
> Now, have you heard the station lately?
>
> Forget entertainment and attracting an audience, you now
> have a
> station that simply BORES the audience to death. The guy
> you have
> doing morning news can barely get through a newscast without
>
> stumbling over half his sentences. And you wonder why
> nobody's
> listening?
>
> Can anyone remember the great old days of AM Top 40? I
> literally
> remember striking up a conversation with friends about what
> the DJ
> did the previous night on WKBW Buffalo - a station about 500
> miles
> away we got on DX at night. Yea, my FRIENDS even listened!
> Not
> because it was DX, but because it was great radio!! Would
> we have
> listened if we had the internet? Probably not as much but
> definitely yes!
>
> You who run radio stations had better pull your head out of
> your ass
> cheeks. Better find a way to attract the young audience,
> but fast,
> because if you don't there really WILL be no listeners left.
> Your
> main audience is probably 38-60 instead of any numbers the
> so-called
> professional bean counters have quoted you. And, as soon as
> the
> advertisers wake up to the fact that nobody's listening to
> the
> radio, your precious revenue stream will dry up. Then what
> do you
> do?
>
> GET LOCAL. It is the ONLY way you will attract an audience.
> That,
> and let your DJs be DJs again. Throw away the liners and
> cue
> cards. Open your playlists. Expand the horizons, and do
> what XM,
> Sirius and MTV can't - talk to and entertain your local
> audience.
>
> Before it's too late.
>
 
Another POV

Just before Xmas I was in CompUSA (THE geekyist of the retail chains, their floor folk really know their stuff) buying my son a computer. I overheard a woman ask for some inside info on sat rads...

...nobody had a clue what to tell her. It's off their collective 20-something radars.
 
> > A statistic I've seen is that heavy iPod users listen to
> about 15 minutes less > radio per week. That is not
> "abandoning radio in droves
>
> I agree. I have an iPod myself! You know what it displaces?
> Mostly satellite radio! When I'm travelling, instead of
> paying XM or Sirius or trying to pick up local stations from
> the freeway, I just record my favorites, pop it into the
> iPod and off I go.

Good point. The hipsters making $7/hr at Circuit City might enjoy listening to the binaural beats of XM's Madagascar channel, but they're in the minority. And did one ever consider that someone that works at an electronics store might actually have a penchant for... electronics! I doubt it's the benefits and attractive red polo shirt uniform.

What gets me is how everyone talks about how music is so easily duplicable on so many other medias (iPods, what have you), but they proceed to say that FreeFM and similar approaches are ridiculous, stupid, and dragging radio down. You can't get Tom Leykis on your iPod (well, you know what I mean). I may occassionally listen to music on my XM, but since I'm not a big music consumer in the first place, it's more a novelty than it is replacing FM... I never listened to music on FM in the first place. Yet I spend countless hours listening to interesting content I couldn't get anywhere else.
 
>>> I miss the radio of the past, but I note that what I listened to wasn't "local" as far as I was concerned. <<<

Yes, but it was live wasn't it? Not voice-tracked or automated. You knew there was someone at the other end of the radio having a great time and drawing you to the station night after night.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom