N
NO DAG
Guest
I'd like to offer a genuine feedback on coverage of the Nor'Easter that hammered the Rutland region. I guess I can give WJJR an E for effort for attempting to provide a public service in time of crisis. The key word there is ultimately WJJR, while Pamal operates a cluster of five distinctive formatted radio stations in Rutland, it appears that the only one that counts is WJJR. Logic would have dictated in time of crisis that all the available stations would have simultcasted wall to wall coverage of major news and weather event in Rutland serving as a public trustee of the airwaves.
It seems to me that the big picture was not in full view as WJJR was placating to the ratings period in progress, since the other stations in the group did not provide a public service of complete information. grabbiing ratings should have not appeared to play into the coverage.
It seems that the professor of programming could not wait to hog the airwaves during the time of crisis sharing the microphone very little with the many possible and credible contributers that would have made the difference between fair and excellent coverage of the events. Last I checked there is another morning host for WJJR who is very capable and credible. (Unless Mr. kelly was on vacation). Last time we checked, WSYB is the news and information station source for Rutland county, and this event affected Rutland county more so than anywhere else in the region. There were hardly any WSYB resources that appeared to be utilized on WJJR until BC finally made it on the airwaves, and a part time simultcast of WJJR's coverage took place.
Just the fact that the 'professor of programming' came up with some sort of positioner that "We're the official crisis information station' shows the view that local Pamal gurus have toward the station portfolio, there's WJJR and then there's the others. In times of crisis, the ratings book and games should have been thrown out the window and the Rutland county residents should have been able to count on the Pamal cluster as a whole versus one selfish part.
That's my opinion, what's yours..
It seems to me that the big picture was not in full view as WJJR was placating to the ratings period in progress, since the other stations in the group did not provide a public service of complete information. grabbiing ratings should have not appeared to play into the coverage.
It seems that the professor of programming could not wait to hog the airwaves during the time of crisis sharing the microphone very little with the many possible and credible contributers that would have made the difference between fair and excellent coverage of the events. Last I checked there is another morning host for WJJR who is very capable and credible. (Unless Mr. kelly was on vacation). Last time we checked, WSYB is the news and information station source for Rutland county, and this event affected Rutland county more so than anywhere else in the region. There were hardly any WSYB resources that appeared to be utilized on WJJR until BC finally made it on the airwaves, and a part time simultcast of WJJR's coverage took place.
Just the fact that the 'professor of programming' came up with some sort of positioner that "We're the official crisis information station' shows the view that local Pamal gurus have toward the station portfolio, there's WJJR and then there's the others. In times of crisis, the ratings book and games should have been thrown out the window and the Rutland county residents should have been able to count on the Pamal cluster as a whole versus one selfish part.
That's my opinion, what's yours..