BRNout said:
argytunes said:
BRNout's post is the reason so many radio stations sound tired.
A
desired demographic and
copycat formats have replaced original programming. With most radio stations offering the same types of formats, does it come as any surprise why MP3 and CD players are so popular? :
argytunes
Whoa argy! Read me again.
I actually complimented WBOQ's local news and large playlist over the tired, tight playlists of Boston stations. But, it does no good to program a station to such a tiny audience as would listen to smooth jazz or classical. If you want to build a "local" station, you need to have music with
some general appeal. That's what they are doing and - they seem to be doing it pretty well. THAT is original programming. I hate the tight formatting that stations such as WODS serve up. But, there's also a happy median. Programming Tibetan folk music because it has 10 diehard fans isn't wise either.
BRNout...
While I don't anticipate a huge following for Tibetan folk music anytime soon...I think you have to admit that local radio stations...which have been bought up by large radio conglomerates...have started to become LESS LOCAL? Maybe this was encouraged by a consultant, a numbers expert, or possibly BOTH? But the formats that appeal to the masses often robs the local listeners of music (or talk) that wouldn't be available...except on a satellite or possibly a syndicated show?
How many radio stations (small, medium or large) actually ASK THEIR LISTENERS if the format is what THEY ENJOY? Sure...you'll a diverse group of answers--and at least a few of 'em will be
completely off-the-wall! But isn't the original purpose of ANY radio station to...serve its listeners within the area of where the programming is transmitted? ???
Or has the appeal of "broadcasting programming to interested listeners" gone the way of the 25 cent postage stamp!
argytunes