• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Northern New England: The Unfairness Doctrine

Ok so I (for the time being) have a little time on my hands… And have used some of the time to read a lot of newspapers and magazines. I have seen a few articles about the Fairness Doctrine pop up and I find the course that some lawmakers want to follow a bit alarming. So I wrote one of my Senators. I advise any who cares to do the same. Radio is already on the ropes and the Fairness Doctrine could be a fatal blow. For what it’s worth I have include the text of my letter to Bernie below.

When I get a reply, I’ll post it.

Privet Citizen,

Louie Manno
____________________________________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator Sanders:

I am concerned about the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine. Imposing regulations for opinion content would all but eliminate an important part of the national dialogue, namely, talk radio. Any concerns in Washington about a lack of balance in American media and its influence on the citizens should be easily assuaged by the results of the recent historic elections.

I agree with you that deregulation has made a real mess out of the broadcast industry. The current ownership rules have allowed large corporations to ride a bubble, which has inexorably burst. The lack of opinion diversity on radio is not the problem. Individual Americans know what they believe, and they have numerous media sources from which to buttress or expand those beliefs. No, the 800-pound gorilla on radio’s sofa is the lack of local coverage. The energies of our lawmakers should be spent drafting legislation that benefits everyone. Surely requiring broadcasters to offer some acceptable amount of local issues coverage would be universally beneficial.

If the Fairness Doctrine were reestablished, it would put government officials in the position of content arbiters; a very dicey business. The federal government acting in such a capacity seems counterintuitive to me.

As an alternative to regulating broadcast content, consider requiring a disclaimer at the beginning of each opinion-based broadcast. That will help frame the context, and from there, Americans can decide for themselves.

Senator Sanders, I know that you have been a strong advocate for more local coverage by broadcasters, but .I’m very interested to know where you stand on the Fairness Doctrine.

Respectfully,

Louie Manno
 
Re: The Unfairness Doctrine

Cool glad that you did that.
I have e-mailed bernie before about my concerns. I hope that he will respond in less than 3 months like it took me about the public transportation issues in Vermont for the NEK

I think many senators get hammered with e-mails these days that its like telling them this
Dear Bernie,
I would like An Fm Antenna put on top of the New DMU's that will replace the Vermonter train so I can listen to Fm radio on the train...
 
Re: The Unfairness Doctrine

Jamie:

Way to be a citizen-activist! You should write Bernie on the Fairness Doctrine. I’ll bet if he gets more than one email on the same subject he’d be more likely to pay attention. Like I said… I have time to kill… and while I have it… I may as well kill in a semi-productive way… ;)And more local coverage means more jobs.

Louie
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom