> > ...this is not really news, particularly in reference to
> the
> > print edition of The Sporting News. It is difficult to
> > conceive of a more irrelevant weekly publication; the
> > leadership at Sporting News should have been replaced long
>
> > ago. Rumors regarding the impending sale of (the print)
> > Sporting News are as old as the hills...I suspect NO ONE
> > will buy it and that it will cease operating as a
> > sportsweekly. As for the radio network...? Maybe realdeal
> > will chime in!
> >
> Of course, there are those of us who think TSN has been
> irrelevant since it quit being an all-baseball publication
>

. I'm old enough to remember when you got every box score,
> minor league stats and standings, columns on every minor
> league...of course, this was in the day when there was
> little sports coverage other than daily newspapers - no
> ESPN, no nightly sports highlights, and certainly no
> Internet.
>
> USA Today's Baseball Weekly seems to have taken that over,
> with help from Baseball America. And really, TSN hasn't been
> relevant since the Spink family sold it to Times Mirror;
> they tried to take on Sports Illustrated and it didn't work.
> SI doesn't make any pretense to be complete but they provide
> high-quality writing. TSN couldn't match that but it gave up
> completeness. And it's been a slow slide ever since.
>
> (My suggestion - have Gannett - USA Today's publisher - buy
> TSN and put the name on its Baseball Weekly, with a big
> splash about going back to all-baseball coverage. As for TSN
> Radio, it would fit in Gannett's broadcasting enterprises.
> Just a suggestion).
>
Boy thats the same idea I had too...Have USA Today buy the name and morphit into the now crappy Sports Weakly......