Well, in a political climate where it's perfectally acceptable in the mainstream media to make fun and openly bash anyone in the Bush administration, I don't think XM's board is too worried about these two clowns jeopardizing regulatory approval for the merger.
Maybe, but why pull them from a satellite format, when this is the kind of programming that the subscribers are paying for and expect? I don't think that XM had a sudden attack of good taste. So I don't see any other motivation.
O&A's bit is the least of the major issues facing the merger.
But why needlessly give these pols and the FCC a chance to settle old scores. They don't have to say "O&A suck, so up yours" but only write the five magic words "not in the public interest" and XM. Sirius, or perhaps both are on the fast track to Chapter 11. No matter how it eventually ends up, merger or not, the pols win.
Dumping O&A as a sacrifice to the political gods, even if only as a token, has little downside. Only Stern has the horsepower to essentially do whatever he wants, since because of his deal, dumping or making Stern clean up his act would be like hanging out a going-out-of-business sign for Sirius, so he's off the table by necessity. Unloading Stern would be the equivalent of Chrysler making a deal to be bailed out by the government provided they agreed to stop making cars. Not so, O&A. My nephew is a congressional staffer, and he tells me that when the word of their stunt rolled through DC, a lot of folks, on both sides of the aisle, who mostly had never heard of O&A before, wanted their heads on a platter. Maybe getting them off the radar screen for a month will suffice. Maybe not.
But, either way, things aren't going to be the same.
Besides, these guys are getting a full pay for the next 30 days and they sounded way too relaxed this morning on their CBS show so there's more to the story than being reported.
Well, why shouldn't O&A be relaxed? Even if they had ended up getting canned, they wouldn't be worried about where their next meal was coming from, which is more than you can say for the shareholders and management of XM and Sirius. Its been speculated that it's a publicity stunt to get subscribers by drawing attention to O&A, but O&A probably rank somewhere below NHL play-by-play as a reason to fork over your $150 per year. Plus, the public has the attention span of a fruit fly. The only way to benefit subscriber-wise from this would be to keep them on the air and gather those subs who want to know now what all the excitement was about.
I feel that this entire thing, no matter how it turns out, is going to have a chilling effect on the media in general, same as the Imus flap which is already having repercussions. Personally, I think there should be NO limits (with certain limited exceptions, such as advocating the murder of someone, and with no exemption from the slander laws) on what can be said over the radio or television, provided the people listening know what the ground rules are beforehand and have made the decision to listen or watch anyway. It won't happen, but I'd rather they err on the side of incaution. As it is, I don't think O&A would be on the beach if it wasn't for XMs and Sirius' financial woes.
YMMV.
Regards,
TSB