This thread is really tiring. You have people who know nothing of radio and those that do going at it. Being in radio, I take offense to comments like 'stupid' and 'suits' are words tossed out by people unable to present a cohesive stand on their opinion.
The person mad at radio not playing songs by artists radio's research cannot prove mass appeal is akin to the being ticked off because Walmart sells the merchandise it does or because a clothing store sells what it does. It seems we get lumped in to the user column as if the CEO at Walmart would be slammed for not shopping at Walmart for everything. I really doubt that CEO does. The reason is radio programmers are not programming for themselves but to create a profit potential for their station so they can keep their jobs. In radio we exercise no control over what advertising agencies and business advertisers do but we are stuck with their criteria they set. Radio reacts, not creates, instead reflecting what is already there. So, what would you have us do, put our careers in jeopardy? Shall we tell stockholders where to go? Would you?
Now that you may be ready to burn me at the stake, I will tell you I love music, like exploring new music and typically like much, much more than is heard on radio. But I realize I am an exception. I know a station reflecting my tastes would not be financially successful. I recognize music plays a differing importance in people's lives. You might love movies and follow actors, going to see everything they do. Not me. I could care less. I'm not a movie buff and as a result I only go to see the biggest and most popular movies I know I will like. A fairly big percentage of the population is like I am with movies when it comes to music.
Obscure songs...
how about Chevy Van by Sammy Johns...Carry On 'Til Tomorrow by Badfinger. Sunday Will Never Be The Same by Spanky & Our Gang...remember that one? Remember Barbra Steisand's more contemporary Stoney End?
Unknowns...Sailing by Kim Carnes (not the Rod Stewart song), Remember Me by Sweetlightnin', Borrowed Time by If, Midnight Man by The James Gang and many many more. Then there are more current artists.
I should also state that the research spoken of is normally limited to major markets. The top music station in my market bills a bit over $25 million a year. You can bet that they are constantly researching what they do. It is easy to reach the top compared to staying there which requires out-thinking all of your competition's good ideas. In smaller markets we grab the research we can and do our best with what the budget allows. We also know we can test unproven things in markets where competition and number of signals is minimal enough. In such markets, more listeners tolerate a song or programming element more than in places where there are so many over the air choices. We tend to have wider playlists because time spent listening is usually higher.
Another fact about radio programming that sounds like the opposite of what is intended: We want to be simply the best choice for as many as possible and the perfect station to a select few. For us, it is not so much about being the favorite but amassing the largest audience that chooses us as their best choice. For radio it is the numbers because the numbers sell advertising and some of those numbers will shop with that advertiser so the advertiser continues to advertise. In the largest markets if you don't have the right ratings in the right demographics, it is the difference between the buy and never making a dime. We could be playing Mongolian Throat Singing around the clock and they don't care, it's all about ratings.
I'll admit, all the researching and tests are not perfect but we now know more than we ever did and less than we will know tomorrow. The coming years will be challenging, I suspect, and I only hope the investors have vision and allow radio to evolve as things change.
There have been great experiments. With such pioneers, the first attempts are usually failures, but we don't stop there. We try again with more knowledge. Clear Channel, as they were known, no matter what you might think of them, tried and failed with a format they branded as Lone Star 92.5 in Dallas/Fort Worth. They even limited things to one commercial an hour...lots of music not heard on radio these days but wound up going back to a small playlist and the typical commercial load. I blame it more than anything on the advertising end and their inability to think outside the box. I'm not blaming the agency but the business that didn't likely have a good handle on what Lone Star's concept meant to them or their budgets did not make the station a great option. Maybe others will try new concepts.
I've always been somewhat of a rebel in that regard but realize I cannot be loose and free with other's money and hold my job. As I pointed out before, we are somewhat like the interior designer that has these wonderful ideas but the client doesn't want that, so you do what is needed to keep the money coming in and the designer's idea rarely if ever get beyond the thought process. In short, we are not a reflection of the radio station personally but just a person doing their job per the directives of those holding the purse strings. I'm sure a Chef at McDonald's flipping burgers would find it tiring, boring and uninteresting but he has that position because people keep buying them. To the people buying them, they might not be their favorite, but they are the preferred option at that moment in time considering their options and obligations.