"Visit our website at WWW dot"....
This one kills me the most. Even worse, I still encounter websites that don't work without the WWW.
"Visit our website at WWW dot"....
Even worse: "LOG IN to WWW dot ...""Visit our website at WWW dot"....
"Podcast." A terrible invention of a word created by combining 'iPod' with 'Broadcast.'
Well, the iPod only existed for a historically fleeting 21 years, and is obsolete now. By the time the risk of patent troll lawsuits was finally eliminated and the big commercial distributors jumped on the podcast bandwagon, Apple's iPod was already a fading fad heading into the sunset. The word now used to describe on-demand audio was already obsolete, almost from the moment podcasts really took off with the masses.
From Dictionary.com:"Podcast." A terrible invention of a word created by combining 'iPod' with 'Broadcast.'
Well, the iPod only existed for a historically fleeting 21 years, and is obsolete now. By the time the risk of patent troll lawsuits was finally eliminated and the big commercial distributors jumped on the podcast bandwagon, Apple's iPod was already a fading fad heading into the sunset. The word now used to describe on-demand audio was already obsolete, almost from the moment podcasts really took off with the masses.
That was the Sony NT cassette, a digital audio cassette introduced in 1992 that was as small as an SD card:IIRC, Video Review mag had a news item (in the early 1990s) about a very very small Sony cassette tape system, the cassette was about the size of 2 pennies side by side...anyway...
Sorry, how is the term "Sony NT cassette" being used today?That was the Sony NT cassette, a digital audio cassette introduced in 1992 that was as small as an SD card:
I was trying to explain Simian to a new user. I talked about building a "cart." He asks, "What's a cart?" I explain it's sort of like an 8-track. He asks "What's an 8-track?" Sheeesh! I am old.Some automaton systems still refer to certain audio files as "carts." Rivendell uses both "carts" and "cuts." There was a time when an actual cart would have multiple cuts on it...
There are still a lot of toll fee numbers out there and for the few that still have landlines I would think the fact they are “toll free” would still be relevant.How about a WATS line or "toll free"? Is that still relevant since everyone I know has long distnace (another term that may be obsolete) included with their phone plan?
I've seen it in print as "Watts line" quite a few times over the years -- as if it were a higher-powered phone line, or a direct connection to a rough section of Los Angeles.How about a WATS line or "toll free"?
Ha! We never gave away free publicity to "those guys". It was as if they didn't even exist, because in the mindset of our owner, they didn't.Remember when stations would refer to their competitors as "those guys on the left of your dial" or "on the right of your dial?"
In a lot of Latin countries, they say "la competencia" or "the competition".Ha! We never gave away free publicity to "those guys". It was as if they didn't even exist, because in the mindset of our owner, they didn't.
Not to swerve this thread, but that controversy has always been interesting to me. In focus groups over the years, more listeners seem to enjoy hearing about a little friendly competition than not. Everyone enjoys a good rivalry. Obviously ignoring your competition from a business perspective is perilous, but I've never seen an example where listeners have fled in mass to another station just because your station compares and contrasts.Ha! We never gave away free publicity to "those guys". It was as if they didn't even exist, because in the mindset of our owner, they didn't.
Agreed you don't want to give your competition free publicity, but I was really referring to the fact that radio dials no longer have a "left" and a "right" ... well, as a matter of fact radios don't have "dials" anymore, just a digital readout.Ha! We never gave away free publicity to "those guys". It was as if they didn't even exist, because in the mindset of our owner, they didn't.
Keeping with this "swerving off topic" for just a bit longer ... Don Imus (660 WNBC New York) would actually play Dan Ingram's jingle on the air (Dan Ingram of course, was on cross-town rival 770 WABC.) Dan himself would play the Jackson Five tune "ABC" and claim "well you never heard a song call 'XLO.'" (A reference to competitor 98.7 WXLO.)Not to swerve this thread, but that controversy has always been interesting to me. In focus groups over the years, more listeners seem to enjoy hearing about a little friendly competition than not. Everyone enjoys a good rivalry. Obviously ignoring your competition from a business perspective is perilous, but I've never seen an example where listeners have fled in mass to another station just because your station compares and contrasts.
But the readout still is wider than it is long, so the listener has a left-to-right reference point.Agreed you don't want to give your competition free publicity, but I was really referring to the fact that radio dials no longer have a "left" and a "right" ... well, as a matter of fact radios don't have "dials" anymore, just a digital readout.