• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Off Topic: Happy Birthday F.C.C.

this day in history 2/23...
In 1927, President Calvin Coolidge signed a bill creating the Federal Radio Commission, forerunner of the Federal Communications Commission.
 
F.C.C. a waste of Tax money !!! F.C.C. Fine are GARBAGE !!! PIRATE RADIO RULES !!!
 
The reason the Federal Radio Commission was set up was to bring some order to the radio business because people were tossing antenna's up everywhere and powering up causing complete chaos, kinda like the CB craze of the 1970's.

Unfortunately, the successor to the FRC, the FCC, has gotten so mired down being the morality police, that they do not pay attention to the fact the FM band is over run with people throwing up antennas and interfering with each other, which was the original purpose of the agency.
 
MRBIboredop said:
Unfortunately, the successor to the FRC, the FCC, has gotten so mired down being the morality police,

When was the last time the FCC was involved with a morality case?
 
Janet Jackson's "Nipplegate" would be the glaring example, any N.A.L. for obscenity violations would be another.

That's just my opinion, you may agree or disagree, it's all good.
 
Don Juan said:
When was the last time the FCC was involved with a morality case?


Go have a talk with Howard Stern. The FCC took great pleasure in fining him millions of Dollars for morality reasons. The FCC should just stick to preventing signal interference and stop playing judge and jury.
 
MRBIboredop said:
Janet Jackson's "Nipplegate" would be the glaring example,

How long ago was that?

MRBIboredop said:
any N.A.L. for obscenity violations would be another.

How long ago was that?

MRBIboredop said:
That's just my opinion, you may agree or disagree, it's all good.

I understand your concern, and no one likes when we start down the road of talking about who can say what...but I think the FCC gets slimed with this accusation, when it's used very seldom.

If all we can come up with is a handful of example over years...then I dont think it's much of a problem.

Skynet74 said:
Go have a talk with Howard Stern. The FCC took great pleasure in fining him millions of Dollars for morality reasons.

How long ago was that? (And BTW...it wasn't Howard Stern that was fined, it was CBS....the license holder.)

Skynet74 said:
The FCC should just stick to preventing signal interference and stop playing judge and jury.

While setting technical standards is a prime role for the FCC it's not as simple as that. They act as "park rangers" for our national parks (aka...our national airwaves)

They make sure the place is kept hospitable for visitors. ;-)
 
Don Juan said:
While setting technical standards is a prime role for the FCC it's not as simple as that. They act as "park rangers" for our national parks (aka...our national airwaves)

They make sure the place is kept hospitable for visitors. ;-)

I don't want my Radio to have park rangers who censor what I can hear. That's why they make tuning knobs. It's also why I subscribe to satellite radio. I Still can't believe that the FCC fined CBS for showing Janet Jackson's nipple for a split second. God forbid people see something that they have underneath their own shirts!

The FCC appears to use very little logic when it comes to handing out fines. No common sense at all! I say they should stick to the interference issues and stop playing Park Ranger.
 
Hmmmm....

The FCC is the National Park Service, then? Or, at least, supposed to be?

As far as "Nipplegate" goes, I just have one question: Can CBS turn around and sue Jackson and Timberlake for damages?
 
>>bring some order to the radio business because people were tossing antenna's up everywhere

as a matter of fact a sep thread here points out that the FCC issued a NAL notice to 99.7 FM in
Mattapan, an unlicensed station which apparently must affect reception of WCRB 99.5. I am guessing
the folks at the Ch 2 megaplex on Guest St are not pleased
 
rapking said:
F.C.C. a waste of Tax money !!! F.C.C. Fine are GARBAGE !!! PIRATE RADIO RULES !!!

you know those DEA photo ops where they show bricks of cocaine and assorted guns? i'm secretly hoping for one of those with 87.7's equipment - DTI aka OFCOM in UK actually has the balls to bust in and confiscate stuff now and then..
 
Skynet74 said:
I don't want my Radio to have park rangers who censor what I can hear. That's why they make tuning knobs.

Well, you are in the minority. Most people believe public place (like the AM & FM bands), should be a hospitable place. Just like you wouldn't want to turn the corner with your small child and find someone fornicating in front of you...or ride on the T with someone with a loud foul mouth.

Skynet74 said:
It's also why I subscribe to satellite radio.

Well, you have just left the National Park and are now on private propert. ;-) As long as you want to pay for it, you can do and get what you want. However, while you are using the public airwaves, you ahve to abide by a few rules of civility.

Again, you are in the minority. ;-) People aren't running to Sat radio in order to get away from the overly censored bands.

Skynet74 said:
I Still can't believe that the FCC fined CBS for showing Janet Jackson's nipple for a split second. God forbid people see something that they have underneath their own shirts!

It wasn't so much for fear of seeing her nipple, as much as it's the idea that performers think they can get away with anything...and broadcasters can shrug and say "Well we didn't know she was going to do that".

You have to draw the line somewhere.

Skynet74 said:
The FCC appears to use very little logic when it comes to handing out fines.
No common sense at all!

I think they make a lot of sense. They rarely use this authority, and when they do so it's to draw the line.

Skynet74 said:
I say they should stick to the interference issues and stop playing Park Ranger.

And I wish park ranger will let me build a house in the National Parks, dump my trash and walk around naked.

But it doesn't work that way.
 
rapking said:
mescutia said:
Can CBS turn around and sue Jackson and Timberlake for damages?
No . Mtv is CBS .

Bzzt! Last I checked, they were corporate cousins at best. And even if MTV was involved in the Super Bowl halftime show at the time [which may have been the case, for all I know], it has nothing to do with my question.
 
Don Juan said:
And I wish park ranger will let me build a house in the National Parks, dump my trash and walk around naked.

But it doesn't work that way


Is that what you want? To dump your trash and walk around naked in the forest? All of a sudden I don't feel so strange for wanting to hear a few curse words on my radio. ;-)
 
Skynet74 said:
Don Juan said:
And I wish park ranger will let me build a house in the National Parks, dump my trash and walk around naked.

But it doesn't work that way

Is that what you want? To dump your trash and walk around naked in the forest? All of a sudden I don't feel so strange for wanting to hear a few curse words on my radio. ;-)

LOL! I'm sure someone does! ;-)
 
rapking said:
The FCC. is a waste of Tax money !!! FCC fines are Garbage. Pirate radio rules.

Then the next time you are on a plane and it has communication issues with the tower, due to a pirate station on the Air band and something happens, you'll wish the FCC was around. They need to step up fining the pirates, and restore order to the FM band.
 
AckDX said:
Then the next time you are on a plane and it has communication issues with the tower, due to a pirate station on the Air band and something happens, you'll wish the FCC was around.

Now you are talking! This is a good reason to keep the FCC around in some form. To prevent interference and accidents. I just don't particulary care for when they stick their nose in censorship issues.
 
Are they old enough yet to get around to notice that Part 15 regulations for unintentional radiators (interference)
are a joke? There has been no compliance or effort to comply since the first cheap lamp dimmers appeared in the 70s.
Why establish any standard at all if it's going to be completely ignored, or set a standard that makes no difference?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom