Thanks for the clarifications. Just about everything you said in your original post was dead-on, as usual. One question, though: Most people seem to talk about Boomers of all ages as a homogenous group, and you seemed to be doing the same (unless you were just avoiding getting bogged down in qualifiers and details). Didn't your research show any significant rift in musical taste between the earliest boomers and those born later? I don't have the research as you do, of course, but is a younger Boomer who was 8 or 10 during the Beatles invasion necessarily going to like Jailhouse Rock or the Everly Brothers? Or might they even have a strong DIS-like for the pre-64 stuff (and some of the later throwbacks)?EDIT: Looking back at your post, I see you just spoke of 25-54's (the proverbial "family reunion" ), didn't use the word "Boomer". But I still bet there's a significant older-vs-younger Boomer issue for oldies.Inventor989 said:Nu Roo: In early 2003, we played everything from late 50s to late 70s...Jailhouse Rock in same hour as Play That Funky Music, etc. In mid-2003, we were given the edict to drop pre-64 entirely, and drop post 74 entirely, except for 70s at 7. We remained in that mode, despite research that said otherwise, until my successor came in. You all can track the Arbitrons as well as I can. The station nosedived from a 3+ to below a 2...and still hasn't come up for air. That didn't all happen because of CCU's blocking tactics...although it didn't help to have 93.3 and 1230 playing an oldies based list.
The numbers would probably be higher than 107.9...(remember the old WCOL-FM as a standalone oldies station topped out at around a 6.4 share!) But, it wouldn't matter. Evenif it could get COL type numbers, the agencies still wouldn't buy the station sufficientlyto make the kinds of financial numbers they'd want.Radioma18 said:How do you think 93.3 would do with there good signal if they went to oldies from the late 50's to the early 70's? Would there ratings improve?
This has been discussed with other internet streams before. There are a lot of factors that go into a move like this. Cost of streaming is expensive so restricting to people in the market is one reason. They are probably playing the local commercials on the internet stream as well, contracts with VO talent has a little bit of play in this decision too.majicjim said:Sounds like the Saga takeover and its subsequent layoffs is giving the station an identity crisis. I also find something else appalling even before the nickname change..the website's audiostream page asking you to type in a zip code. If you live in Dayton,Cincinnatti or anywhere else outside of metro Columbus,you are denied unless if you type in a Columbus zip code. Bad move 'ODB!
The station was already oldies before Saga acquired it over three years ago.majicjim said:Sounds like the Saga takeover and its subsequent layoffs is giving the station an identity crisis.
Methinks either 1) you don't like me, you really don't like me (to paraphrase Sally Field) or 2) you didn't get what I was saying. I was referring to 93.3 and Clear Channel's strategy in my last post, not WODB.And, BTW, I still have my door key to the building. Bill and I are friends and I still occasionally do work for WSNY.radiogal03 said:Ouch. Nice lecture from someone not within the walls of ODB. How about the double ratings in the last two books? But that's ok...keep dredging your b.s., and I'll keep putting revenue on the books for my dear friend Bill...who, by the way, is busting his hump to bring that signal back to life. [EDIT=Inflamatory comment]
Inventor989 said:The research we did in 2003 and 2004 looked at 40-54 adults exclusively. As you'd expect, the younger folks had less tolerance for the older music, but there were always a group of consistently strong pre-1964 songs, usually about 25-30 tunes strong enough to justify play.