• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Omnia ONE

Kevin Tekel said:
I'm just wondering about something at http://www.omniaaudio.com/fm.htm :
"Couple that with years of real-world radio engineering experience, plus Omnia exclusives like the world's first user-adjustable multiband crossover network, and it's no wonder top stations choose Omnia to dominate their markets."

The CRL Audio Signature had user-adjustable multiband crossovers 15 years ago. It has trimpots on the front panel to adjust the L/M1 crossover from 80 to 320 Hz and the M2/H crossover from 2 to 8 kHz. Does Omnia's claim predate this?
Click to expand...

Looks like the webmaster forgot the words "time-aligned". That is what the page should say.

The Omnia X-Overs are time-aligned, and the CRL method is not. That's a significant difference. It's not possible to easily time-align analog x-over networks.

-Frank Foti
 
FFoti1 said:
Kevin Tekel said:
I'm just wondering about something at http://www.omniaaudio.com/fm.htm :
"Couple that with years of real-world radio engineering experience, plus Omnia exclusives like the world's first user-adjustable multiband crossover network, and it's no wonder top stations choose Omnia to dominate their markets."

The CRL Audio Signature had user-adjustable multiband crossovers 15 years ago. It has trimpots on the front panel to adjust the L/M1 crossover from 80 to 320 Hz and the M2/H crossover from 2 to 8 kHz. Does Omnia's claim predate this?
Click to expand...

Looks like the webmaster forgot the words "time-aligned". That is what the page should say.

The Omnia X-Overs are time-aligned, and the CRL method is not. That's a significant difference. It's not possible to easily time-align analog x-over networks.

-Frank Foti
Click to expand...


Frank
Could you clarify which Omnia Fm audio processors have time aligned user adjustable Xovers?
Regards
Scott
 
I thought this thread died 10 months ago? Nobody is going to buy an audio processor because 10 years ago the company did X Y or Z. I don't see a rush on Dorrough 310's. Audio processing is selected on features TODAY, audio quality TODAY and customer support of the product.
 
stace said:
Yes but the Unity had user adjustable cross-overs pretty early in the piece also.
Click to expand...
CRL Audio Signature: introduced 1990
Cutting Edge Unity 2000: introduced 1991

Both were digitally-controlled analog processors.
 
dspxscott said:
Frank
Could you clarify which Omnia Fm audio processors have time aligned user adjustable Xovers?
Regards
Scott
Click to expand...

There was a custom, special release of Omnia.fm that had this.

-Frank Foti
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom