• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Opie & Anthony bandits strike again...

...this time on WABC-TV.

On the second story of "Eyewitness News at Noon" this afternoon (6-7), two young ladies, holding what appeared to be a (well-drawn) homemade O&A sign, ran up from the stairs of a subway station in Long Island City, Queens, just as reporter Marcus Solis was doing a live report on a sexual assault which occured early this morning in that same station.

The girls planned their sabotage attempt perfectly, as they made their ascent from the underground at the same time the studio cut to the scene. It should be noted that Mr. Solis kept his cool and stayed focused. Once the taped piece was over, the director sent it right back to the studio, where co-anchor Lori Stokes said simply, "That was Marcus Solis reporting".

I cringed when I saw what was happening. I was really hoping that Mr. Solis wouldn't melt under pressure like Arthur Chi'en did on WCBS-TV a couple of weeks ago. Perhaps Marcus let the girls (who look to be of high-school age, BTW) have it once the camera was off. An assist goes to the person who was calling the shots in the control room for not returning to the scene.

Working in that environment, I can go on about how booth clerks are vital and should remain inside, but this is not the forum for this. My question is this: what are Opie and Anthony doing to encourage this kind of behavior? And, if they aren't directly doing so, then why aren't they telling their fans not to do these sorts of things, especially when someone else's job is involved?<P ID="signature">______________
"Everybody wants something they'll never give up...Everybody wants something, they'll take your money and never give up!" -- The Zit Remedy, "Degrassi Junior High"</P>
 
I think that the stations should start billing XM for ad time everytime this is done. That might stop them. Also, I think there is a law about non MTA sanctioned adverts in the subway, so that may be another one. And have you noticed that these things have been all occuring at subway stations?

Also, there seems to be someone coordinating these ad assaults, and it is most likely someone at the Idiot and Moron show.

When the two fools are personally effected, ie. loss of pay, maybe they will stop.
I know for one I won't be getting XM Radio because I have no desire to contributing to their paychecks. Sure I will be missing out on some good stuff, but then again I would not be in a position to hear them which isn't a bad thing.<P ID="signature">______________
WCBS = We're Crazy Buffoons and Schmucks
<a href=http://chuck.spotteddogs.org/tv/>Spotted Dog TV Talk - for all your non-news TV Talk</a></P>
 
> And, if
> they aren't directly doing so, then why aren't they telling
> their fans not to do these sorts of things, especially when
> someone else's job is involved?

The reality is the exact opposite. Dopey and Tony are SPECIFICALLY ENCOURAGING this behavior. They are directly involved. I made essentially the same suggestion a couple of weeks ago that Toby did. When your employees solicit behavior, you are taking specific responsibility. Period. My actual suggestion was billing the actual on camera morons, then suing when they can't pay. THAT will stop the behavior, or you'll have a nice fat added revenue stream.
 
Even though these people are acting like morons I don't think the TV station has any right to bill (or sue) these people. When a newscaster does a live report from the middle of the street they are setting themselves up for this type of stuff. The reporter could just as easily have reported the story from back at the studio. Is it really necessary that we see the subway station in the background while he tells the story? There are live reports on the air every day where people are dancing in the background and making fools of themselves in front of the camera. My point is, I don't think the TV station has any legal rights against this.


> > And, if
> > they aren't directly doing so, then why aren't they
> telling
> > their fans not to do these sorts of things, especially
> when
> > someone else's job is involved?
>
> The reality is the exact opposite. Dopey and Tony are
> SPECIFICALLY ENCOURAGING this behavior. They are directly
> involved. I made essentially the same suggestion a couple
> of weeks ago that Toby did. When your employees solicit
> behavior, you are taking specific responsibility. Period.
> My actual suggestion was billing the actual on camera
> morons, then suing when they can't pay. THAT will stop the
> behavior, or you'll have a nice fat added revenue stream.
>
 
> Even though these people are acting like morons I don't
> think the TV station has any right to bill (or sue) these
> people.

I'm not a lawyer, but I think they at least have a case. The big difference between O&A's gelatin for brains fans and the typical nitwit who makes him/herself look like a fool is that there is an actual attempt at material gain. A television station makes money by selling advertising time to clients. By hijacking a live remote to attempt to sell O&A, you're taking something for free that the station is trying to sell. That's called theft. If you want to go the criminal route, that could be noticeable time in the clink.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom