I tuned in for a few moments and heard a nut job who described a special US designed airplane that put a hologram image of a plane flying into the World Trade Center at the moment that "they" detonated the explosion which brought the towers down. That nut job was the host. Nuff said. I will go back to late night TV when I can't sleep. Lionel had so odd theories but he had a sense of humor. This new guy seems naive enough to believe the nonsense he spouts.
Think about that for a moment. All of us who've lived through that tragedy/atrocity can remember seeing video (unless you were in lower Manhattan yourself at that moment and witnessed it live) of the first plane hitting the side of one tower, then 15 minutes later the second plane slamming into the second tower. Followed by another hour of smoke, fire, occupants trying to escape while firemen and police were fighting their way into the towers to attempt to rescue other people. Around the end of that hour, the second tower lost its structural stability and began pancaking, and after another 10 or 15 minutes the first tower joined it. We've all seen the footage, the images, ad nauseam for a quarter century.
Okay, so when was this hologram projected onto the building? How were hundreds of people on the street misled by their own eyes? How'd that (assumedly)
fixed wing aircraft stay in one place for all that time? If the explosives were set off by a military (or intelligence agency) aircraft, how do you account for the hole with the outline of a Boeing plane punched through the building? Did that "government" plane stay there for that ~90 minutes to keep the image in view until the building came down? Then what? Wouldn't it have to have been sucked into the vortex as the building pancaked, or make a fast and loud escape to avoid becoming collateral roadkill? And what about the other tower? Are we to believe there was another plane hovering on the other side?
I could go on with probably another hundred questions debunking the bunk.
I wasn't there that day, but from California I saw the coverage live, watched TV news coverage from home
while it was happening, before the buildings went down, and then from a TV in my office. And six weeks later, I was in New York and New Jersey, and my flight went right by Ground Zero and "the pile" on its final approach into Newark. It was especially painful to see, since I spent my college years watching those building go up from across the other river, walking distance away from the construction site.
So if what Hyrum wrote is accurate, I don't ever need to listen to "Walter Sterling", now or ever. Walt Sabo didn't have my respect before -- I was around to hear the execution of his bright idea for a "game zone" and how it destroyed KFRC in the mid '80s -- and his new attempt to fearmonger and throw out absurd conspiracy theories should make him unfit to ever appear on what's left of WABC.
barrettmedia.com
