• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Ottumwa translators off air

There is an article in the Ottumwa Courier about the problems faced by the Ottumwa Area Translator System. Apparently they are trying to move to a new tower due to problems with the existing one south of Ottumwa. Much of Ottumwa is within the Des Moines River valley and reception of the Des Moines stations is pretty much impossible if you live in the valley. Even on higher ground, the signals from Alleman are tough to pick up clearly at 80 miles.

http://www.ottumwacourier.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15404651&BRD=2575&PAG=461&dept_id=513091&rfi=6

When I moved to Ottumwa in 1979, they were K74CO with KCCI and K78BZ with WHO. My understanding is that channel 74 originally carried KCRG (KTVO was a CBS affiliate in the 60's) and that there was a also translator on channel 71 for KHQA, which was owned by Lee Enterprises (owner of the local paper and KHQA).

In the late 80's the 70-83 channels were given over to cellular, and KCCI moved to K23CI and WHO moved to K27CV. K25DE was added around that time, first carrying KDSM and later KYOU after they moved their transmitter site to Richland. In town, we used the translators until we got cable, and when we moved to the country, they provided a better signal than the Des Moines stations.

In addition to the OATS translators, Ottumwa has K33AA, which carries Iowa Public TV's KIIN. It is supposed to be increasing power and moving to channel 18, since KTVO signed on their digital signal on channel 33. Does anyone know if 18 is on the air yet?

I hope they and IPTV can get the translators back on the air and develop a plan for the digital conversion. The area has a lot of low-income and elderly folks who now will have to pay $15/month for lifeline cable (in town) or do without (in the country). I realize that TV is not a necessity in life, but there is benefit in people having access to news from their state capital and quality educational programming. In my 20+ years in Ottumwa, I don't remember seeing any fundraising activities for OATS, and just assumed that the TV stations carried provided support.
 
Reading the article, I have to wonder whether the group really knows what it's doing. The president apparently told the reporter that they applied to the FCC to change the tower site "some time ago" but the FCC database lists no applications for any of the stations.

I've always been a big fan of translator systems, but over-the-air TV is losing its relevancy. I wonder if it's worth the money to keep translators on the air that are needed by fewer and fewer people everyday. Currently about 85% of the country gets its TV from cable or satellite (though local channels are still not available on satellite in the Kirksville-Ottumwa market). That number is probably lower in Ottumwa.

With the digital cutover looming, I have to wonder how many of the remaining non-cable/satellite households will actually change over to digital OTA reception. Besides the converter, most households that rely on rabbit ears will have to put up an outdoor antenna, too. How many will pick up cable or satellite, and how many (the ones who don't watch much TV anyway) will just give up live TV completely in favor of DVD's?
 
> Reading the article, I have to wonder whether the group
> really knows what it's doing. The president apparently told
> the reporter that they applied to the FCC to change the
> tower site "some time ago" but the FCC database lists no
> applications for any of the stations.
>
Thought that was odd, too. However, I've noticed the FCC database
has been a little behind, as in the example of KJMC in DM. IIRC,
a few years ago they moved (for a time) to the former Ch 17 tower
near Alleman, but it was several weeks before the records showed
up on the FCC database. Could that be the case here?

Meanwhile, I looked at the records of KOTT-LP, an app on channel
10 in Ottumwa. 3 kW at 96 meters seems a bit much, given the
protected contour of co-channel WGEM-TV in Quincy is only about
30 miles SE of KOTT's proposed site. (Now for a bit of totally
useless info: there used to be either an app or a CP on channel
10 in Ottumwa for K10OO. Granted, the last two positions were
"Oscar Oscar" not "zero zero" but "Big K One thousand" had a nice
odd-ball ring to it!)

> I've always been a big fan of translator systems, but
> over-the-air TV is losing its relevancy. I wonder if it's
> worth the money to keep translators on the air that are
> needed by fewer and fewer people everyday. Currently about
> 85% of the country gets its TV from cable or satellite
> (though local channels are still not available on satellite
> in the Kirksville-Ottumwa market). That number is probably
> lower in Ottumwa.
>
> With the digital cutover looming, I have to wonder how many
> of the remaining non-cable/satellite households will
> actually change over to digital OTA reception. Besides the
> converter, most households that rely on rabbit ears will
> have to put up an outdoor antenna, too. How many will pick
> up cable or satellite, and how many (the ones who don't
> watch much TV anyway) will just give up live TV completely
> in favor of DVD's?
>
Interesting. Could it be that the licensees of commercial broadcast TV will
see more value in their network affiliation than the value of
their license, whether full power or flea power? That's probably
been the case all along, as a net affiliated VHF would have had
more value than an independent V, all things equal. But in the
future, net affiation may be almost everything. Just having a
transmitter might not mean squat.
 
> When I moved to Ottumwa in 1979, they were K74CO with KCCI
> and K78BZ with WHO. My understanding is that channel 74
> originally carried KCRG (KTVO was a CBS affiliate in the
> 60's)

That's correct, KCRG was the original station on that translator.

> and that there was a also translator on channel 71 for
> KHQA, which was owned by Lee Enterprises (owner of the local
> paper and KHQA).

That I did not recall, but you are correct, Lee owned the Courier then, as well as KHQA.

> I don't remember seeing any
> fundraising activities for OATS, and just assumed that the
> TV stations carried provided support.
>
My recollection is that, at least for the first several years, the city owned, operated, and funded the translators.

I do remember that KTVO fought tooth and nail against the introduction of cable TV in Ottumwa. There was a franchise election in 1970 or 1971. Leading up to the election, every station ID slide on KTVO had a message, naming the various towns where there was already cable carriage of KTVO:

Viewers In
MOBERLY, MO.
Are Paying To See This Message

The franchise passed anyway.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom