• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Overpowered translators

104.5 has a cochannel in Beaumont that is easily picked up in Houston when Beaumont is off the air. 92.5 also shares their channel with stations in Beaumont and Bay City, but these are rarily heard in Houston. Height plus a clear channel make the difference.
I really don’t think that’s why you can hear 92.5 further to the north than 104.5. You can still hear the 92.5 in KWUP’s weak coverage. You lose 104.5 before KZCW starts to come in.
 
They're probably not using a directional antenna and may be running more power than they are licensed for.
With an antenna height of nearly 1000', they will have a good signal on a car radio, even with 30 watts of power.
It does puzzle me that the translator is extending the originating station's (97.5) coverage beyond it's protected contour.
The FCC just seems to look the other way when it comes to these translators. I wouldn’t doubt it’s running 1000 watts at 1000 feet. And being fed by an HD2 that doesn’t exist
 
You remember earlier this year when 92.5's current owners were going after the former owners for running a co-channel translator with 1000 watts or more? I do, and funny when they're now doing the same thing. Or has anyone actually taken measurements of their signal and verified it's running at legal parameters?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom