• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Paging Brian Williams, Charles Gibson and Bob Schieffer.....

J

Joseph_Gallant

Guest
Since I don't think NBC anchor Brian Williams, interim ABC anchor Charles Gibson, nor interim CBS anchor Bob Schieffer were on their respective evening newscasts on Friday (August 26th), I suspect they were trying to get in some late-Summer vacation time.

It's actually somewhat of a tradition for the "big three" evening news anchors to take a week or two of vacation prior to Labor Day with their returning to their respective anchor desks either on Labor Day or the day after that holiday.

But Hurricane Katrina is due to hit New Orleans tomorrow (August 29th), possibly as a historically-powerful storm. It has, at this writing, sustained winds of 145 miles per hour, just 10 MPH below the threshold of a "Class 5" hurricane, the most powerful possible. If Katrina gets sustained winds of 155 miles per hour or stronger at landfall, it would be only be the fourth "Class 5" hurricane ever to hit the United States (although it should be noted several other hurricanes over the years that reached "Class 5" status had weakened to "Class 4" or "Class 3" status at initial U.S. landfall). The other three hurricanes that were "Class 5" at landfall were the 1935 Labor Day storm (before hurricanes had names), Camille in 1969 and Andrew in 1992.

I would think that given the circumstances, if indeed Williams, Gibson and Schieffer are on vacation that they're going to be summoned back to New York ASAP. If Katrina does hit the mainland as a Class 5 storm (and especially if it's winds are well in excess of the 155 MPH threshold for a Class 5 storm, which some forecasters are worried it could), the networks may end up running lots of special coverage, since Katrina has the potential to be one of the worst natural disasters in modern history.

And I would think that ABC, CBS and NBC would want their lead anchors available to go on the air for a story like this.

Thus, don't be surprised if Charles Gibson, Bob Schieffer and Brian Williams are on the air tomorrow to anchor their respective evening newscasts and any special updates or live coverage of the storm that their networks may provide.
 
What was the point of posting that? It doesn't matter who delivers the news of a hurricane.. as long as the news is delivered. Plus, who watches the networks for hurricane coverage anyway? Ever heard of The Weather Channel?

> Since I don't think NBC anchor Brian Williams, interim ABC
> anchor Charles Gibson, nor interim CBS anchor Bob Schieffer
> were on their respective evening newscasts on Friday (August
> 26th), I suspect they were trying to get in some late-Summer
> vacation time.
>
> It's actually somewhat of a tradition for the "big three"
> evening news anchors to take a week or two of vacation prior
> to Labor Day with their returning to their respective anchor
> desks either on Labor Day or the day after that holiday.
>
> But Hurricane Katrina is due to hit New Orleans tomorrow
> (August 29th), possibly as a historically-powerful storm. It
> has, at this writing, sustained winds of 145 miles per hour,
> just 10 MPH below the threshold of a "Class 5" hurricane,
> the most powerful possible. If Katrina gets sustained winds
> of 155 miles per hour or stronger at landfall, it would be
> only be the fourth "Class 5" hurricane ever to hit the
> United States (although it should be noted several other
> hurricanes over the years that reached "Class 5" status had
> weakened to "Class 4" or "Class 3" status at initial U.S.
> landfall). The other three hurricanes that were "Class 5" at
> landfall were the 1935 Labor Day storm (before hurricanes
> had names), Camille in 1969 and Andrew in 1992.
>
> I would think that given the circumstances, if indeed
> Williams, Gibson and Schieffer are on vacation that they're
> going to be summoned back to New York ASAP. If Katrina does
> hit the mainland as a Class 5 storm (and especially if it's
> winds are well in excess of the 155 MPH threshold for a
> Class 5 storm, which some forecasters are worried it could),
> the networks may end up running lots of special coverage,
> since Katrina has the potential to be one of the worst
> natural disasters in modern history.
>
> And I would think that ABC, CBS and NBC would want their
> lead anchors available to go on the air for a story like
> this.
>
> Thus, don't be surprised if Charles Gibson, Bob Schieffer
> and Brian Williams are on the air tomorrow to anchor their
> respective evening newscasts and any special updates or live
> coverage of the storm that their networks may provide.
>
 
Energy AZ wondered:

> It doesn't matter who delivers the news of a hurricane...
> as long as the news is delivered. Plus, who watches the networks
> for hurricane coverage anyway? Ever heard of The Weather Channel?

The truth is that for live "crisis" news coverage, the broadcast networks still attract more total viewers than the combined viewership of the cable news channels.

Yes, the Weather Channel (along with CNN, Fox News Channel, and MSNBC) will have many more viewers tomorrow (August 29th) when Hurricane Katrina makes landfall than on a typical Monday. But should the broadcast networks also decide to pre-empt much of their program schedule tomorrow for live wall-to-wall storm coverage (which I think is a real possibility; at this writing, Katrina has sustained winds of 175 miles per hour, well above the 155 MPH treshold of a "Class 5" hurricane, the most poperful category), the total number of people watching live ABC, CBS and NBC storm coverage would be greater than the total number of people watching live storm coverage on CNN, Fox News Channel, MSNBC and the Weather Channel.
 
Your overthinking again. Why would ABC-TV or any other regular network go wall to wall when it just a southern storm. People in New England, The Midwest, Southeast, Northwest, and others areas don't care because it is not effecting them.
 
> Your overthinking again. Why would ABC-TV or any other
> regular network go wall to wall when it just a southern
> storm. People in New England, The Midwest, Southeast,
> Northwest, and others areas don't care because it is not
> effecting them.
>

I really don't think the major 3 should go wall to wall, but this is history in the making. Also, this storm will affect much of the Southeast, Northeast, and New England. A very very large area will be hit with this storm. Southeast will care too.<P ID="signature">______________
Check my website www.freewebs.com/radiostuffandnews
</P>
 
BLAH BLAH BLAH

That's all I see anymore.

> Energy AZ wondered:
>
> > It doesn't matter who delivers the news of a hurricane...
> > as long as the news is delivered. Plus, who watches the
> networks
> > for hurricane coverage anyway? Ever heard of The Weather
> Channel?
>
> The truth is that for live "crisis" news coverage, the
> broadcast networks still attract more total viewers than the
> combined viewership of the cable news channels.
>
> Yes, the Weather Channel (along with CNN, Fox News Channel,
> and MSNBC) will have many more viewers tomorrow (August
> 29th) when Hurricane Katrina makes landfall than on a
> typical Monday. But should the broadcast networks also
> decide to pre-empt much of their program schedule tomorrow
> for live wall-to-wall storm coverage (which I think is a
> real possibility; at this writing, Katrina has sustained
> winds of 175 miles per hour, well above the 155 MPH treshold
> of a "Class 5" hurricane, the most poperful category), the
> total number of people watching live ABC, CBS and NBC storm
> coverage would be greater than the total number of people
> watching live storm coverage on CNN, Fox News Channel, MSNBC
> and the Weather Channel.
>
 
> BLAH BLAH BLAH
>
> That's all I see anymore.

What do you have against Joseph Gallant so much? Even though he posts a lot, he doesn't attack people or act like a jerk. Thats what you're doing. Got anything better to do than pick on someone who doesn't deserve it?

> > Energy AZ wondered:
> >
> > > It doesn't matter who delivers the news of a
> hurricane...
> > > as long as the news is delivered. Plus, who watches the
> > networks
> > > for hurricane coverage anyway? Ever heard of The Weather
>
> > Channel?
> >
> > The truth is that for live "crisis" news coverage, the
> > broadcast networks still attract more total viewers than
> the
> > combined viewership of the cable news channels.
> >
> > Yes, the Weather Channel (along with CNN, Fox News
> Channel,
> > and MSNBC) will have many more viewers tomorrow (August
> > 29th) when Hurricane Katrina makes landfall than on a
> > typical Monday. But should the broadcast networks also
> > decide to pre-empt much of their program schedule tomorrow
>
> > for live wall-to-wall storm coverage (which I think is a
> > real possibility; at this writing, Katrina has sustained
> > winds of 175 miles per hour, well above the 155 MPH
> treshold
> > of a "Class 5" hurricane, the most poperful category), the
>
> > total number of people watching live ABC, CBS and NBC
> storm
> > coverage would be greater than the total number of people
> > watching live storm coverage on CNN, Fox News Channel,
> MSNBC
> > and the Weather Channel.
> >
>
 
> Your overthinking again. Why would ABC-TV or any other
> regular network go wall to wall when it just a southern
> storm. People in New England, The Midwest, Southeast,
> Northwest, and others areas don't care because it is not
> effecting them.
>
Agreed. NBC would of course have MSNBC to run as much live coverage as warranted, but except in the south, wall-to-wall coverage isn't warranted. Regular updates? Sure. Extensive coverage on the morning and nite shows? Obviously. But even the most extreme type of weather, except for those IN it who need the local info, doesn't make compelling enough news for pre-emptions.

Moreover, any one of the backup anchors on the major networks is perfectly capable of handling it. I can't for the life of me imagine anyone saying "That's not Brian Williams...I'm going to ABC to watch my rain coverage."

All of that said, my sincere prayers are with everyone in the strike zone for this storm. I can't imagine what they must be experiencing, leaving behind (in most cases) nearly everything, and having no idea if they'll come back to anything...not to mention the emergency workers in harm's way protecting everyone. God speed.
 
> Energy AZ wondered:
>
> > It doesn't matter who delivers the news of a hurricane...
> > as long as the news is delivered. Plus, who watches the
> networks
> > for hurricane coverage anyway? Ever heard of The Weather
> Channel?
>
> The truth is that for live "crisis" news coverage, the
> broadcast networks still attract more total viewers than the
> combined viewership of the cable news channels.
>
> Yes, the Weather Channel (along with CNN, Fox News Channel,
> and MSNBC) will have many more viewers tomorrow (August
> 29th) when Hurricane Katrina makes landfall than on a
> typical Monday. But should the broadcast networks also
> decide to pre-empt much of their program schedule tomorrow
> for live wall-to-wall storm coverage (which I think is a
> real possibility; at this writing, Katrina has sustained
> winds of 175 miles per hour, well above the 155 MPH treshold
> of a "Class 5" hurricane, the most poperful category), the
> total number of people watching live ABC, CBS and NBC storm
> coverage would be greater than the total number of people
> watching live storm coverage on CNN, Fox News Channel, MSNBC
> and the Weather Channel.
>
It's true that to the viewers it really matters little just who delivers news of the hurricane, as long as the job is competently executed. The who question is important to the respective networks, which see it as a promotable event when the titular head of NBC, CBS, or ABC is at the anchor desk jockeying reports from the various correspondents in the field who are up close to the hurricane (or whatever the event may be). The event itself bears a high degree of importance, but of greater value to network brass is the ability in the aftermath when topical promos are produced to say, "OUR anchor was there to tell you about it." It has to do with viewer perception that Williams, Schieffer, and Gibson (interim as two of them may be) are ramrodding their respective networks' coverage when major stories break. And Katrina definitely is a major league story. Bottom line, as Joseph Gallant posted on Saturday, "Don't be surprised to see the main network anchors cancel vacation plans and get back to the studio.
 
Brian Williams IN New Orleans

They just talked to him at the very end of Nightly News Sunday live from NO.

> Since I don't think NBC anchor Brian Williams, interim ABC
> anchor Charles Gibson, nor interim CBS anchor Bob Schieffer
> were on their respective evening newscasts on Friday (August
> 26th), I suspect they were trying to get in some late-Summer
> vacation time.
>
> It's actually somewhat of a tradition for the "big three"
> evening news anchors to take a week or two of vacation prior
> to Labor Day with their returning to their respective anchor
> desks either on Labor Day or the day after that holiday.
>
> But Hurricane Katrina is due to hit New Orleans tomorrow
> (August 29th), possibly as a historically-powerful storm. It
> has, at this writing, sustained winds of 145 miles per hour,
> just 10 MPH below the threshold of a "Class 5" hurricane,
> the most powerful possible. If Katrina gets sustained winds
> of 155 miles per hour or stronger at landfall, it would be
> only be the fourth "Class 5" hurricane ever to hit the
> United States (although it should be noted several other
> hurricanes over the years that reached "Class 5" status had
> weakened to "Class 4" or "Class 3" status at initial U.S.
> landfall). The other three hurricanes that were "Class 5" at
> landfall were the 1935 Labor Day storm (before hurricanes
> had names), Camille in 1969 and Andrew in 1992.
>
> I would think that given the circumstances, if indeed
> Williams, Gibson and Schieffer are on vacation that they're
> going to be summoned back to New York ASAP. If Katrina does
> hit the mainland as a Class 5 storm (and especially if it's
> winds are well in excess of the 155 MPH threshold for a
> Class 5 storm, which some forecasters are worried it could),
> the networks may end up running lots of special coverage,
> since Katrina has the potential to be one of the worst
> natural disasters in modern history.
>
> And I would think that ABC, CBS and NBC would want their
> lead anchors available to go on the air for a story like
> this.
>
> Thus, don't be surprised if Charles Gibson, Bob Schieffer
> and Brian Williams are on the air tomorrow to anchor their
> respective evening newscasts and any special updates or live
> coverage of the storm that their networks may provide.
>
 
Energy AZ wrote:

> > BLAH BLAH BLAH
> >
> > That's all I see anymore.

Dennis responded:

> What do you have against Joseph Gallant so much? Even though
> he posts a lot, he doesn't attack people or act like a jerk.
> Thats what you're doing. Got anything better to do than pick
> on someone who doesn't deserve it?

My reply:

I don't think Energy AZ was talking about me in his most recent post, but about network news anchors in general.

Yes, I do post a lot on these boards, but I always try to present interesting information, post news of interest to other Radio-Info.com visitors, or present analysis and commentary related to the thread.

If I ever have a problem with a fellow user of these boards, I do not criticize that person on the public messageboards. Instead, I would contact a moderator.
 
> I really don't think the major 3 should go wall to wall, but
> this is history in the making. Also, this storm will affect
> much of the Southeast, Northeast, and New England. A very
> very large area will be hit with this storm. Southeast will
> care too.

Finally someone mentions this. When the National Hurricane Center AND the National Weather Service are stating this could possibly be the worst natural disaster to hit the U.S, this is a major story. At least to those in it's path, which is pretty much everyone to the North and East of this. Granted some networks tend to overblow things (no pun intended), the potential destruction of a major city (and travel destination) is huge. This storm will continue to be very damaging a day after it has hit land. I am in Ohio and the amount of rain they're predicting from this -- two days after it hit landfall -- is enormous. I have been watching this since Sunday afternoon.
 
> > I really don't think the major 3 should go wall to wall,
> but
> > this is history in the making. Also, this storm will
> affect
> > much of the Southeast, Northeast, and New England. A very
> > very large area will be hit with this storm. Southeast
> will
> > care too.
>
> Finally someone mentions this. When the National Hurricane
> Center AND the National Weather Service are stating this
> could possibly be the worst natural disaster to hit the U.S,
> this is a major story. At least to those in it's path,
> which is pretty much everyone to the North and East of this.
> Granted some networks tend to overblow things (no pun
> intended), the potential destruction of a major city (and
> travel destination) is huge. This storm will continue to be
> very damaging a day after it has hit land. I am in Ohio and
> the amount of rain they're predicting from this -- two days
> after it hit landfall -- is enormous. I have been watching
> this since Sunday afternoon.
>
And the forecast track sends it into Canada, so it will impact
a good chunk of the eastern half of the United States.

BTW, I guarantee that if Dan Rather still anchored the CBS
Evening News, he'd have gone to New Orleans. Rather came to
CBS's attention with his coverage of Hurricane Carla for KHOU/11
Houston in 1961 and always seemed to thrive on hurricane coverage.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom