Under the terms of the pact, brokered after months of turbulent negotiations, the deadline has now automatically extended for an additional 90 days, pushing the new target to July 7, 2025. If regulatory hurdles persist beyond that date, a second 90-day extension could kick in, keeping the merger alive but unresolved into the fall.
Could they approve it tomorrow?The FCC hasn't approved the sale of the stations yet. Their investigation was apparently not affected by the settlement.
Even if approval came tomorrow at the FCC, I doubt the rest of the deal could be finalized so fast. And if the FCC puts any conditions on the sale, then it will take considerable time to write the closing documents. Such a deal likely has many, many boxes of documents that are made part of the agreement, and any change can affect multiple entities.Could they approve it tomorrow?
So likely it'll be pushed back another 3 months?Even if approval came tomorrow at the FCC, I doubt the rest of the deal could be finalized so fast. And if the FCC puts any conditions on the sale, then it will take considerable time to write the closing documents. Such a deal likely has many, many boxes of documents that are made part of the agreement, and any change can affect multiple entities.
But tall_guy1 needs the specific date and time...Here's a report that says it will close before the end of the summer:
There is no set procedure for closings, just as there is no "standard" procedure for mergers.What time of day do these mergers close?
And we probably won't get that until there is an after the fact press release: "Today, company A and company B completed their merger. Jim Smith of Company A said, "this will be a great basis for the future of... "But tall_guy1 needs the specific date and time...
But if the sale is not completed today, it will be pushed back 3 months and Paramount will have to pay a fine.And we probably won't get that until there is an after the fact press release: "Today, company A and company B completed their merger. Jim Smith of Company A said, "this will be a great basis for the future of... "
And so on.
That report deals mostly with the Trump lawsuit. It does not detail whether either side will be subject to a penalty for not closing "today".
It looks like that's from a different article and must have misread it as the 400 million fine is just if they split. But looks like it's October now.That report deals mostly with the Trump lawsuit. It does not detail whether either side will be subject to a penalty for not closing "today".
Again, there are no rules that companies must follow for a merger action. In fact, they make up their own rules in the negotiations, and can change them at any point if there is agreement.
There are laws pertaining to how companies organize and operate, but we can do a lot of different things within those rules.
Read for comprehension, Mr. Tall_guy: IF one side decides to pull out of the merger while the other side has met its obligations under the agreement, then a penalty (as specified in the agreement) might kick in. If both sides are unhappy and want to walk away, it's within their power to dissolve the merger agreement without invoking any penalties. It's all in what's in the interests of the parties to the agreement, in their individual and collective judgments.It looks like that's from a different article and must have misread it as the 400 million fine is just if they split. But looks like it's October now.
it also postponed the Digman second season premiere too as that show has South Park being it's lead in and is a show that is half-Indiana Jones parody, half Nic Cage parody in which the lead character is voiced by SNL Alumni Andy Sandberg playing the title character with a voice that mimics Nic Cage's voice.![]()