• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Part 15 AM Signals over Perfect and Poor Earth Conductivities

I was asked in a PM about the distance that a Part 15 AM setup operating between 1600 and 1700 kHz could provide useful signals, in areas of poor earth conductivity.

The link below leads to a NEC-2D analysis of this, comparing fields from 200 meters to 1600 meters away from the transmit antenna for perfect earth and 2 mS/m earth, from the same Part 15 setup.

The effects of poor conductivity are easily seen.

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h85/rfry-100/Part15_AM_Typ_Fields.jpg

RF
 
druidhillsradio said:
Can you do something different with these graphs? They are too hard to read.

Below is a link to a PDF version that is easier to read.

The values could be re-plotted so as to be read with higher precision, but the goal was just to illustrate the general effects of poor conductivity on the transmission of ground waves in the AM band.

http://www.box.com/s/f3fba74297884db384a5

RF
 
I'm trying to understand something ...
You say useful coverage in a quiet area extends to the 150 µV/m contour. (IIRC, David Eduardo says coverage in an urban area only extends to the 10 or 15 mV/m contour. I'm not totally sure if that means a barely-detectable carrier, a totally noise-free signal (maximum legal modulation would physically blow out your eardrums, no modulation would be completely inaudible (assuming healthy ears) in an anechoic chamber) or something between, but I'm assuming based on his previous comments that it's more like the noise-free signal.)
So is that 150 µV/m signal in a quiet area supposed to be noise-free on a typical consumer portable radio, like a Tecsun PL-310, Sony SRF-M37W, etc (not including cheap/insensitive Coby radios)? What field strength in a quiet area would you say would be the limit for being able to detect a very faint signal (which of course is dependent on the quality of the radio and antenna used)?

Also I've looked at the FCC protection rules for licensed broadcast stations a little. As I understand it, Class A stations' groundwave contours are protected to the 100 µV/m contour by a factor of 26 dB. I understand that means that at that level, an interfering station's signal has to be at least 26 dB below the class A station, which would work out to about a 5 µV/m signal.
In a quiet environment on the surface of the earth (not in a screen room), what might be the reception quality of a 5 µV/m signal in the absense of other interfering stations? (I'm assuming a beverage antenna or other large loop antenna would be required to pick up that signal, if it's possible at all.) Also what might be the typical distance / groundwave field separation for co-channel 50kW ND class A stations (they're actually protected, IIRC, to the 50% 500 µV/m skywave contour), and what might their groundwave field be at the approximate location where the two Class A stations' signals are equal?
 
pianoplayer88key said:
You say useful coverage in a quiet area extends to the 150 µV/m contour. (IIRC, David Eduardo says coverage in an urban area only extends to the 10 or 15 mV/m contour.)

The MW field intensity needed to provide reception useful to most listeners depends on conditions at the receive location as well as the receiver and antenna used.

The ~ 150 µV/m daytime field of WLS, Chicago is listenable on a good car radio at most locations in my small city, but that reception is not noise free.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom